|
|
Post by aztecwin on Feb 24, 2014 17:19:02 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Feb 24, 2014 19:50:28 GMT -8
We will find out more as time goes by. Rather like when Bush lied about Iraq and bin Laden. Of course as Bush is a Republican some were just fine with his lies. We find out with time if Obama is right or not. Of course if he is wrong his actions will have saved lives, rather than costing our country thousand of lives and tens of thousands of casualtys. The Bush lies cost our lives. |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Feb 24, 2014 21:40:06 GMT -8
I won't. He's a f****** liar.
|
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Feb 25, 2014 3:36:23 GMT -8
we all know washington post isn't a reliable source.
|
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Feb 25, 2014 8:30:44 GMT -8
I won't. He's a f****** liar. For once I agree with you. Bush was a f***** liar who's lies killed thousands of Americans. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Feb 25, 2014 17:34:40 GMT -8
We will find out more as time goes by. Rather like when Bush lied about Iraq and bin Laden. Of course as Bush is a Republican some were just fine with his lies. We find out with time if Obama is right or not. Of course if he is wrong his actions will have saved lives, rather than costing our country thousand of lives and tens of thousands of casualtys. The Bush lies cost our lives. Lied about Iraq? Only if you redefine "lie". If you say something that you believe is true, it doesn't become a lie when it is found to be false. Obama knows his law didn't add folks who would have been added anyway because they became a certain age. That is a blatant lie of a pre-known thing. He has been told it is a lie and he still makes it front and center in his retoric. The Washington post is not a conservative paper. Liberal papers New York Times Washington Post Conservative papersNew York Post Washington Times |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Feb 25, 2014 18:18:38 GMT -8
We will find out more as time goes by. Rather like when Bush lied about Iraq and bin Laden. Of course as Bush is a Republican some were just fine with his lies. We find out with time if Obama is right or not. Of course if he is wrong his actions will have saved lives, rather than costing our country thousand of lives and tens of thousands of casualtys. The Bush lies cost our lives. Lied about Iraq? Only if you redefine "lie". If you say something that you believe is true, it doesn't become a lie when it is found to be false. Obama knows his law didn't add folks who would have been added anyway because they became a certain age. That is a blatant lie of a pre-known thing. He has been told it is a lie and he still makes it front and center in his retoric. The Washington post is not a conservative paper. Liberal papers New York Times Washington Post Conservative papersNew York Post Washington Times Bush lied. He wanted a war in Iraq from the moment he entered the White House. |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Feb 25, 2014 18:27:41 GMT -8
Lied about Iraq? Only if you redefine "lie". If you say something that you believe is true, it doesn't become a lie when it is found to be false. Obama knows his law didn't add folks who would have been added anyway because they became a certain age. That is a blatant lie of a pre-known thing. He has been told it is a lie and he still makes it front and center in his retoric. The Washington post is not a conservative paper. Liberal papers New York Times Washington Post Conservative papersNew York Post Washington Times Bush lied. He wanted a war in Iraq from the moment he entered the White House. Long before that, really. |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Feb 26, 2014 8:37:40 GMT -8
I won't. He's a f****** liar. For once I agree with you. Bush was a f***** liar who's lies killed thousands of Americans. No. He wasn"t. |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Feb 26, 2014 8:40:53 GMT -8
Lied about Iraq? Only if you redefine "lie". If you say something that you believe is true, it doesn't become a lie when it is found to be false. Obama knows his law didn't add folks who would have been added anyway because they became a certain age. That is a blatant lie of a pre-known thing. He has been told it is a lie and he still makes it front and center in his retoric. The Washington post is not a conservative paper. Liberal papers New York Times Washington Post Conservative papersNew York Post Washington Times Bush lied. He wanted a war in Iraq from the moment he entered the White House. You know this How? He told you. You read this where? |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Feb 26, 2014 9:48:12 GMT -8
Lied about Iraq? Only if you redefine "lie". If you say something that you believe is true, it doesn't become a lie when it is found to be false. Obama knows his law didn't add folks who would have been added anyway because they became a certain age. That is a blatant lie of a pre-known thing. He has been told it is a lie and he still makes it front and center in his retoric. The Washington post is not a conservative paper. Liberal papers New York Times Washington Post Conservative papersNew York Post Washington Times Bush lied. He wanted a war in Iraq from the moment he entered the White House. Lied about what exactly? |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Feb 26, 2014 12:18:02 GMT -8
Bush lied. He wanted a war in Iraq from the moment he entered the White House. You know this How? He told you. You read this where? I will have look around in my study for the book. It was written by an early cabinent member. He was a CEO of some big company in Pittsburg, as I recall. Richard Clark's book may also have some insight. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Feb 26, 2014 12:19:41 GMT -8
Bush lied. He wanted a war in Iraq from the moment he entered the White House. Lied about what exactly? WMDs, and Iraq's involvement in 9/11. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Feb 26, 2014 12:51:31 GMT -8
WMDs, and Iraq's involvement in 9/11. Not true of course. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Feb 26, 2014 14:01:32 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Feb 26, 2014 14:06:08 GMT -8
WMDs, and Iraq's involvement in 9/11. Not true of course. You still think all the WMDs are buried in the Syrian desert? |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Feb 26, 2014 15:59:46 GMT -8
WMDs, and Iraq's involvement in 9/11. The legal case for Iraq was their breaking of the terms of surrender. The reason for Iraq was WMD. Everyone thought WMD were in Iraq before the Bush's administration started talking about it. Clinton said he believed that too. Dem senators said we shouldn't attack because of WMD before Bush made the case. Bush believed it. Sadam used deception to make poeple believe it and suceeded. Saying it was a lie is twisting facts. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Feb 26, 2014 16:46:27 GMT -8
WMDs, and Iraq's involvement in 9/11. The legal case for Iraq was their breaking of the terms of surrender. The reason for Iraq was WMD. Everyone thought WMD were in Iraq before the Bush's administration started talking about it. Clinton said he believed that too. Dem senators said we shouldn't attack because of WMD before Bush made the case. Bush believed it. Sadam used deception to make poeple believe it and suceeded. Saying it was a lie is twisting facts. The French did not think so. The Germans did not think so. Please provide a link that says the reason for the war "breaking the terms of surrender". We did not go to war because we believed Saddam's lies, but because G.W. Bush wanted too. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Feb 26, 2014 17:20:15 GMT -8
You still think all the WMDs are buried in the Syrian desert? There was never a lie! What is wrong with you dim wits? They were following the best intell that they had. If it proved wrong, still no lie. Want a lie? Think about obamakare and keeping your Doctor and the $2500 decrease in premiums. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Feb 26, 2014 17:28:54 GMT -8
You still think all the WMDs are buried in the Syrian desert? There was never a lie! What is wrong with you dim wits? They were following the best intell that they had. If it proved wrong, still no lie. Want a lie? Think about obamakare and keeping your Doctor and the $2500 decrease in premiums. Yes, it was a lie. The intel they used was cherry picked to justify a war. As to Obamacare my 60 year old self-employed contractor client told me he is saving over $500 a month, with smaller copays and lower cap. He told me he is one happy conservative. |
|
