|
|
Post by aztec70 on Oct 20, 2013 19:27:15 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 21, 2013 11:06:23 GMT -8
Krugman is just short of half right. Right about the rollout and mostly wrong about the rest. If what the people, mostly lefties, want is a "single payer" system, go design one that could work and roll it out in a competent manner. I can see a lot of wisdom in "single payer" if properly drawn up and implemented.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Oct 21, 2013 11:41:37 GMT -8
Medicare would be the model, I think.
|
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Oct 21, 2013 13:30:56 GMT -8
Medicare would be the model, I think. Yup! |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 21, 2013 13:42:37 GMT -8
Krugman is just short of half right. Right about the rollout and mostly wrong about the rest. If what the people, mostly lefties, want is a "single payer" system, go design one that could work and roll it out in a competent manner. I can see a lot of wisdom in "single payer" if properly drawn up and implemented. Would have been a much better chore for the GOP for the last year or two, instead of fighting a losing battle in delaying or defunding the ACA |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Oct 21, 2013 18:09:38 GMT -8
Never happen. This obamacare program is so weak and expensive I think the public will finally realize that govt. control is not good and only govt. could screw it up big time.
|
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Oct 22, 2013 8:51:48 GMT -8
Never happen. This obamacare program is so weak and expensive I think the public will finally realize that govt. control is not good and only govt. could screw it up big time. So - come up with a reasonable workable alternative instead of just whining about it. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Oct 22, 2013 10:33:30 GMT -8
Never happen. This obamacare program is so weak and expensive I think the public will finally realize that govt. control is not good and only govt. could screw it up big time. As if businesses do not screw things up. |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Oct 22, 2013 11:18:38 GMT -8
Never happen. This obamacare program is so weak and expensive I think the public will finally realize that govt. control is not good and only govt. could screw it up big time. As if businesses do not screw things up. Not to the tune of $17 trillion. If they do screw up, they are outta business. And if they really screw up, someone goes to jail. No one is damn accountable in govt. and that hurts the public on a much bigger scale as we see now. |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 22, 2013 11:33:43 GMT -8
As if businesses do not screw things up. Not to the tune of $17 trillion. If they do screw up, they are outta business. And if they really screw up, someone goes to jail. No one is damn accountable in govt. and that hurts the public on a much bigger scale as we see now. Yea, all those Wall Street fellows are in jail! Wait... Curious where you came up with 17 trillion. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 22, 2013 11:37:01 GMT -8
Not to the tune of $17 trillion. If they do screw up, they are outta business. And if they really screw up, someone goes to jail. No one is damn accountable in govt. and that hurts the public on a much bigger scale as we see now. Yea, all those Wall Street fellows are in jail! Wait... Curious where you came up with 17 trillion. Jail is where about half this Obama administration should be along with Ken Lay and the Schillings of the world. |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 22, 2013 11:38:54 GMT -8
Yea, all those Wall Street fellows are in jail! Wait... Curious where you came up with 17 trillion. Jail is where about half this Obama administration should be along with the Schillings of the world. Curious... On what grounds? War crimes, unconstitutional surveillance? Secret bj? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 22, 2013 12:06:28 GMT -8
Jail is where about half this Obama administration should be along with the Schillings of the world. Curious... On what grounds? War crimes, unconstitutional surveillance? Secret bj? I could give you a long list of what I consider crimes, but none have been adjudicated so lets just say they should be in Protective custody for the protection of the public and not them. We could start with Fast and Furious and go on to Benghazi. |
|
|
|
Post by azson on Oct 22, 2013 12:57:09 GMT -8
Curious... On what grounds? War crimes, unconstitutional surveillance? Secret bj? I could give you a long list of what I consider crimes, but none have been adjudicated so lets just say they should be in Protective custody for the protection of the public and not them. We could start with Fast and Furious and go on to Benghazi. Have those "blown up" yet? Please keep me informed... |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 22, 2013 13:20:26 GMT -8
I could give you a long list of what I consider crimes, but none have been adjudicated so lets just say they should be in Protective custody for the protection of the public and not them. We could start with Fast and Furious and go on to Benghazi. Have those "blown up" yet? Please keep me informed... that goddamn ghestopo |
|
