|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 5, 2013 7:34:28 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by cmonaztecs on Oct 6, 2013 11:57:49 GMT -8
Right wing scare tactics again and again....people who could never qualify because of pre-existing conditions are now finally able to get insurance. The Affordable Care Act was modeled after Romney's plan that is already working in Massachusetts. AMAC's scare tactics and lies about losing your current doctor are just flat out lies and diversions. Sure there are kinks to be worked out like with anything.
I'd look at who is backing AMAC, oh the greedy Medical establishment.
Sent from my A200 using proboards
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Oct 6, 2013 19:11:53 GMT -8
I checked out their website. I can't join, I am a liberal. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 12, 2013 12:29:41 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Oct 17, 2013 8:47:10 GMT -8
Make all government employees enroll in it and we will see how fair it is. No exclusions.
|
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 17, 2013 13:18:24 GMT -8
Make all government employees enroll in it and we will see how fair it is. No exclusions. Good luck with that |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Oct 17, 2013 14:07:16 GMT -8
Make all government employees enroll in it and we will see how fair it is. No exclusions. Good luck with that Then it's a piece of $#!+ bill. No exclusions. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 18, 2013 14:38:57 GMT -8
Just so no another thread on this issue is started I will post this clip of Neil Cavuto here. www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDdmtJCEWPAIt sure sums up a lot of the flaws in obamakare and at the same time shows you who is at fault. |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 18, 2013 15:13:18 GMT -8
Just so no another thread on this issue is started I will post this clip of Neil Cavuto here. www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDdmtJCEWPAIt sure sums up a lot of the flaws in obamakare and at the same time shows you who is at fault. The flaws of Obamacare stem from one simple fact: the law was crafted in order to garner bipartisan support (i think you'd agree with that). It obviously didn't get bipartisan support, and now to oppose the Democrats, Republicans are attempting to chip away even further, and Republican states are sabotaging it as much as possible (even though they are the states that need it most). Now i'll watch your video and see how asinine it is. |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 18, 2013 15:16:38 GMT -8
Yep, asinine.
|
|
|
|
Post by 78aztec82 on Oct 18, 2013 15:34:01 GMT -8
They aren't Republican States but those with less urban populations, not nearly as dependent upon government services as city and metropolitan folks. Yep, that is a hyper-general and simplistic assessment but close to accurate.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using proboards
|
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 18, 2013 16:26:10 GMT -8
They aren't Republican States but those with less urban populations, not nearly as dependent upon government services as city and metropolitan folks. Yep, that is a hyper-general and simplistic assessment but close to accurate. Sent from my DROID RAZR using proboards Those states with "less urban populations" are a drag on the national economy by receiving more in federal money than they contribute. (i.e. being the "taker" states) These taker states are nearly all solid red and have the highest percent of uninsured folks - people need health insurance there more than anywhere and GOP leadership is not allowing it. |
|
|
|
Post by 78aztec82 on Oct 18, 2013 17:21:39 GMT -8
They aren't Republican States but those with less urban populations, not nearly as dependent upon government services as city and metropolitan folks. Yep, that is a hyper-general and simplistic assessment but close to accurate. Sent from my DROID RAZR using proboards Those states with "less urban populations" are a drag on the national economy by receiving more in federal money than they contribute. (i.e. being the "taker" states) These taker states are nearly all solid red and have the highest percent of uninsured folks - people need health insurance there more than anywhere and GOP leadership is not allowing it. The political economics of farm subsidies and interstate hwy construction are looked at as national issues. Sent from my DROID RAZR using proboards |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 19, 2013 6:45:55 GMT -8
They aren't Republican States but those with less urban populations, not nearly as dependent upon government services as city and metropolitan folks. Yep, that is a hyper-general and simplistic assessment but close to accurate. Sent from my DROID RAZR using proboards Those states with "less urban populations" are a drag on the national economy by receiving more in federal money than they contribute. (i.e. being the "taker" states) These taker states are nearly all solid red and have the highest percent of uninsured folks - people need health insurance there more than anywhere and GOP leadership is not allowing it. What is your source? It is hard for me to think that Wyoming is more dependent than New Jersey or California. |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 19, 2013 11:02:40 GMT -8
Those states with "less urban populations" are a drag on the national economy by receiving more in federal money than they contribute. (i.e. being the "taker" states) These taker states are nearly all solid red and have the highest percent of uninsured folks - people need health insurance there more than anywhere and GOP leadership is not allowing it. What is your source? It is hard for me to think that Wyoming is more dependent than New Jersey or California. I didn't have to look it up to source - it's quite a well-known fact. The first article I saw in a google search just now was from Bloomberg... New Jersey is one of the top two provider states, receiving only 60 cents in federal spending for every dollar they contribute. Red states notoriously suck the federal tit for more of the blue states' hard-earned income - maybe that's why republicans can envision a smaller government easier, they already get double the benefits. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Oct 19, 2013 12:47:15 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Oct 19, 2013 13:20:30 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Oct 19, 2013 13:24:08 GMT -8
Bloomberg The Economist Slate Huffington Post Washington Post Business Insider Daily Beast That was on the first two pages of search results. Don't like Politifact? Okay, take your pick. Red states are the takers, blue states are the makers. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Oct 19, 2013 14:11:54 GMT -8
Then it should be easy for you to provide a reliable site, or cite, that disproves it. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Oct 19, 2013 14:16:08 GMT -8
Then it should be easy for you to provide a reliable site, or cite, that disproves it. It's your turd, not mine. |
|
