Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2010 13:39:04 GMT -8
I'd rather not make a judgement off of just one video of each guy, but based on those two vids alone, I would not bother with Caudill. Dude is big... and thats about it. Garrett, on the other hand, appears to have some big upside to him. He is a workhorse in the video that was posted, plays strong, fundamental defense, attacks the glass, clears space, can finish his layups with defenders all over him. Also has a big frame at 250 pounds, could esily see him get up to around 265 with lots of muscle.
|
|
|
|
Post by pokinsky on Jul 26, 2010 15:30:21 GMT -8
please keep in mind the Caudill vids are 1-2 years old and he has improved, lost some baby fat and moves much better. But I agree, Garrett looks much better in these vids. However, this new kid Kuemper is intriguing, and seems like he is a much better athlete than Caudill and has better fundamentals than Garrett. Check out the vid of Kuemper ... looks fairly solid with a great shot (83% FT shooter). videos.oregonlive.com/oregonlive/2010/06/basketball_highlights_icp_port.html |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2010 20:23:11 GMT -8
Thanks for the video. Kid definitely has the fundamentals, I like his game. Even hits the 15 footer and has a pretty clean stroke.
|
|
