|
Post by AztecWilliam on Jul 12, 2010 12:30:33 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 12, 2010 15:50:30 GMT -8
Will we take note and learn from the experience of Sweden?
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Jul 13, 2010 7:48:09 GMT -8
In politics and economics things are quite often not what they seem to be.
Economists are just like religious leaders (in fact they have a lot in common) since they both expect their followers to accept theory as fact so they can make additional theories appear to be believable.
|
|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on Jul 13, 2010 20:20:15 GMT -8
In politics and economics things are quite often not what they seem to be. Economists are just like religious leaders (in fact they have a lot in common) since they both expect their followers to accept theory as fact so they can make additional theories appear to be believable. I'll bet that's why they call economics "The Dismal Science"! AzWm
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Jul 18, 2010 8:48:09 GMT -8
In politics and economics things are quite often not what they seem to be. Economists are just like religious leaders (in fact they have a lot in common) since they both expect their followers to accept theory as fact so they can make additional theories appear to be believable. I'll bet that's why they call economics "The Dismal Science"! AzWm To qualify as science, an area of study has to have theories proven by scientific analysis. Unfortunately, Economics has many theories, but few if any can be proven by science. That is a dismal record. My father, an atheist/agnostic (depending upon how drunk he was) used to tell me that if you put any three theolgians together in a room, in very short order they would find something to argue about. Lock them in a room long enough, and they will kill each other. I would dare to speculate that the same would hold true with economists as well even if they would not kill each other, they would probably do physical harm to those they disagreed with.
|
|