|
|
Post by aztec70 on Jun 6, 2011 12:34:49 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Jun 6, 2011 12:51:50 GMT -8
Libtard site.
Won't waste the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Jun 6, 2011 17:44:44 GMT -8
Libtard site. Won't waste the time. Attacking the messenger? =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by 78aztec82 on Jun 6, 2011 18:12:14 GMT -8
Shameless left wing lies get a pass, apparently.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Jun 6, 2011 20:55:35 GMT -8
Shameless left wing lies get a pass, apparently. Stu, feel free to post a link. |
|
|
|
Post by Yoda on Jun 7, 2011 5:56:19 GMT -8
Libtard site. Won't waste the time. Then try reading, "The Republican Noise Machine" -- subtitled: Right-Wing Media and How it Corrupts Democracy". It's written by a former conservative insider. I've never actually read it myself -- it's among the seemingly hundreds of books that I bought "meaning to read but never got around to it". Nevertheless, I suggest that it touches on the same topic -- and it's not written by a "libtard" -- whatever the hell that is. Yoda out... . |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Jun 7, 2011 6:19:40 GMT -8
Libtard site. Won't waste the time. Then try reading, "The Republican Noise Machine" -- subtitled: Right-Wing Media and How it Corrupts Democracy". It's written by a former conservative insider. I've never actually read it myself -- it's among the seemingly hundreds of books that I bought "meaning to read but never got around to it". Nevertheless, I suggest that it touches on the same topic -- and it's not written by a "libtard" -- whatever the hell that is. Yoda out... . Yoda out and about the Internet Message boards there are four type of tards. They are Retards, Libtards, Contards and Fuktards. Fuk means the other four letter word, but since Fukushima has Fuked the entire globe, the three letter word has taken the place of the four letter word. Four letters are somehow extremely offensive to sensitive ears while three letters are not. Sort of like $#!+ is extremely offensive and Excrement is not. As best I can figure the people who are sensitive have an extreme dislike of four letter words like those mentioned above and words like crap and piss and dick and **** and stuff like that. But that is another issue. A Retard is just someone who is not too bright. A Libtard is someone who can only see things through liberal spectacles. They cannot see any conservative justification for anything. A Contard is someone who can only see things through conservative spectacles. Sometimes they are called Nazies, Facists, untra Conservatives and other less spectacular names. Now, a Fuktard is somebody who has the judgment and discernment of a protozoa and usually all they do is post nonsense to a message board. About one out of every ten people who post are Fuktards. For the most part, the Pathological Liars Clique qualifies as the Fuktards on this board. They do it with pride and malice aforethought. Their effort is the only documented instance in the Message Board posting in the United States where a bunch of Fuktards got together and were organized in their posting. Psychologists around the world are waiting to see if it happens anywhere else in the world. They have been waiting for a long time. |
|
|
|
Post by 78aztec82 on Jun 7, 2011 9:15:59 GMT -8
Shameless left wing lies get a pass, apparently. Stu, feel free to post a link. Should we start with Weiner? John Edwards? Those two are in the news today. Shall I continue? I will comment about my former Senator, Mr Edwards. Here is a guy, paying a cool million of unreported funds to shelter his lover and love-child while propping his cancer stricken wife on the Presidential election circuit for what reason? Family values and commitment to his wife. Yeah, only republicans are shameless liars.  |
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Jun 7, 2011 12:15:18 GMT -8
+1 to Joe ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Jun 7, 2011 13:07:58 GMT -8
Stu, feel free to post a link. Should we start with Weiner? John Edwards? Those two are in the news today. Shall I continue? I will comment about my former Senator, Mr Edwards. Here is a guy, paying a cool million of unreported funds to shelter his lover and love-child while propping his cancer stricken wife on the Presidential election circuit for what reason? Family values and commitment to his wife. Yeah, only republicans are shameless liars. See, I knew you could do it. Feeling better now?  |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Jun 7, 2011 15:00:58 GMT -8
Libtard site. Won't waste the time. Then try reading, "The Republican Noise Machine" -- subtitled: Right-Wing Media and How it Corrupts Democracy". It's written by a former conservative insider. I've never actually read it myself -- it's among the seemingly hundreds of books that I bought "meaning to read but never got around to it". Nevertheless, I suggest that it touches on the same topic -- and it's not written by a "libtard" -- whatever the hell that is. Yoda out... . >>>I've never actually read it myself...<<< You are seriously pathetic, Mister "Moderate". I mean, seriously; you recommend a source you admit you haven't had the time to read, and offer it as a foil. Do you even have a clue as to how that reinforces how transparently phony your protestations of being a "moderate" are? Is that what "moderates" do? At least the moonbat libtards on here are up front about their positions. You, on the other hand... Hey, maybe grandma can tell you what the book has to say. Let us know. |
|
|
|
Post by Yoda on Jun 7, 2011 15:29:54 GMT -8
>>>I've never actually read it myself...<<< You are seriously pathetic, Mister "Moderate". I mean, seriously; you recommend a source you admit you haven't had the time to read, and offer it as a foil. I didn't offer it as a foil. I was just noting that there are things you can read on the topic that were written by someone other than the "libtards". I don't care if you read or respond to the topic; I'm not trying to engage you. There is another book on that same unread shelf called "The politics of lying" -- an old book, as I recall. I don't know what side of the political spectrum the author writes from, if any. I think the topic is interesting and I look forward to retirement. Yoda out... . |
|
|
|
Post by uwaztec on Jun 7, 2011 16:17:33 GMT -8
Then try reading, "The Republican Noise Machine" -- subtitled: Right-Wing Media and How it Corrupts Democracy". It's written by a former conservative insider. I've never actually read it myself -- it's among the seemingly hundreds of books that I bought "meaning to read but never got around to it". Nevertheless, I suggest that it touches on the same topic -- and it's not written by a "libtard" -- whatever the hell that is. Yoda out... . >>>I've never actually read it myself...<<< You are seriously pathetic, Mister "Moderate". I mean, seriously; you recommend a source you admit you haven't had the time to read, and offer it as a foil. Do you even have a clue as to how that reinforces how transparently phony your protestations of being a "moderate" are? Is that what "moderates" do? At least the moonbat libtards on here are up front about their positions. You, on the other hand... Hey, maybe grandma can tell you what the book has to say. Let us know. Sid, there really are more than two kinds of people in the US. Those left of Nixon and Goldwater ("Libtards") and the 35% that Palin and Bachman get.... really. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Jun 7, 2011 16:32:12 GMT -8
>>>I've never actually read it myself...<<< You are seriously pathetic, Mister "Moderate". I mean, seriously; you recommend a source you admit you haven't had the time to read, and offer it as a foil. Do you even have a clue as to how that reinforces how transparently phony your protestations of being a "moderate" are? Is that what "moderates" do? At least the moonbat libtards on here are up front about their positions. You, on the other hand... Hey, maybe grandma can tell you what the book has to say. Let us know. Sid, there really are more than two kinds of people in the US. Those left of Nixon and Goldwater ("Libtards") and the 35% that Palin and Bachman get.... really. NIXON?? Seriously....NIXON? Putting Nixon in the same sentence with Goldwater is ... ...aw, fercrissake. There was nothing conservative about that a$$##le. |
|
|
|
Post by uwaztec on Jun 7, 2011 16:43:30 GMT -8
Ok Ok... I forgot Nixon was far left. Created OSHA, National Environmental Protection Act, Clean Air etc. Nixon full on Libtard... I did say 35% didn't I. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Jun 7, 2011 16:47:47 GMT -8
Ok Ok... I forgot Nixon was far left. Created OSHA, National Environmental Protection Act, Clean Air etc. Nixon full on Libtard... I did say 35% didn't I. That's right! And his Attorney General decided that the 2nd Amendment did not protect an individual right. Far enough left for me! Full on Libtard. And a crook, to boot. |
|
|
|
Post by uwaztec on Jun 7, 2011 16:56:40 GMT -8
Ok Ok... I forgot Nixon was far left. Created OSHA, National Environmental Protection Act, Clean Air etc. Nixon full on Libtard... I did say 35% didn't I. That's right! And his Attorney General decided that the 2nd Amendment did not protect an individual right. Far enough left for me! Full on Libtard. And a crook, to boot. Man..guys like you and AFAN are gonna blow a gasket if you don't get your own state soon. Ever thought of Utah, Idaho or Texas (parts of).... and you live in the Bay Area?? It must be 80% Libtards up there.. you are in the maelstrom of the planet Libtard! |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Jun 8, 2011 12:31:58 GMT -8
Libtard site. Won't waste the time. Attacking the messenger? =Bob Absolutely. Soros funded, and run by a former editor of Mother Jones. No credibility. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on Jun 9, 2011 10:18:39 GMT -8
I noticed that in the linked article, a number of the incidents cited came under Democrat rule. Gulf of Tonkin in particular.
But I would like to comment on the Tet Offensive. Based on my armchair general knowledge of history, it seems to me that the Tet Offensive was a last throw of the dice by the Viet Cong. A bit like the Ardennes offensive by the Germans in December, 1944. That's the Battle of the Bulge, of course. The Germans, after inflicting lots of damage on the Allies, failed in that attempt and they were basically finished after that.
Now imagine if there had been network TV in everyone's home in December, 1944 and 1968-style reporters were sending images of the brave and outnumbered 101st Airborne Division soldiers trying to hold off the attacks by the German Panzers. I can just imagine the reports: "This is horrible, folks, US soldiers freezing and dying. They may surrender at any moment. After years of fighting we are in an unwinnable quagmire!" The fact is that, even if the Germans had gone all the way to Antwerp, the Allies would not have lost the war. But anyone looking at 1968-style reports from Bastogne might well have have thought that our chances in the war were not too good. (Similar TV reports from the Civil War front in the Summer of 1864 would also have made the North's cause look very doubtful.)
The fact is that the Tet Offensive, even more than the Battle of the Bulge, was a big victory for the Americans. (The Viet Cong were pretty much finished after that and the North Vietnamese then stepped up their participation.) However, it was portrayed by the press here as a defeat.
AzWm
|
|
