|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on May 21, 2011 18:34:35 GMT -8
I'm not sure in which thread I wrote it, but apparently I thought I was responding to Stu rather than Pooh and suggested Stu was a supply clerk when I meant to troll Pooh on being a supply clerk. If that is the case I apologize to Stu, who is in fact a warrior (and an Aztec Warrior) and completely deserving of our respect.
=Bob
|
|
|
|
Post by 78aztec82 on May 22, 2011 8:59:35 GMT -8
OK, accepted by me but you slimed the entire military and those that have been through the ringer on your behalf. It was sad. I am glad that the forum is so poorly viewed that others serving here in Iraq or over in Afghanistan didn't read it. I saw your olive branch was short-lived though when you went on a new rant impugning my opinion and suggesting I had no right to psot on another simple topic rather than address my point. I don't get it. Troll on but it only makes the troll - well - a troll.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on May 22, 2011 10:44:17 GMT -8
I was never in any clerical job in the Navy nor after. His lame attempt at covering up an ill advised rant was not directed at me, but I guess small people (in all ways) are like that. Sad!
|
|
|
|
Post by uwaztec on May 22, 2011 20:31:36 GMT -8
Never quite understood the personal attacks on here.... attacking an ideology or opinion I get, but a person's work history / life??? Before the Internet you actually had to face someone to discuss ideas or trash talk them if you wanted. Its just too easy to do now..... unfortunately.
|
|
|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on May 23, 2011 10:34:12 GMT -8
I'm not sure in which thread I wrote it, but apparently I thought I was responding to Stu rather than Pooh and suggested Stu was a supply clerk when I meant to troll Pooh on being a supply clerk. If that is the case I apologize to Stu, who is in fact a warrior (and an Aztec Warrior) and completely deserving of our respect. =Bob Bob, since you are obviously intelligent and generally well-informed, it puzzles me how difficult it is to get you to understand certain fairly obvious points. Example: why do you make belittling remarks about a fellow Aztec fan's job-related duties? Do you have something against supply clerks? Is the job of supply clerk to be considered beneath contempt? Bob, it just does not make a bit of difference what somebody did. Why bring it up? AzWm |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on May 23, 2011 10:46:11 GMT -8
I'm not sure in which thread I wrote it, but apparently I thought I was responding to Stu rather than Pooh and suggested Stu was a supply clerk when I meant to troll Pooh on being a supply clerk. If that is the case I apologize to Stu, who is in fact a warrior (and an Aztec Warrior) and completely deserving of our respect. =Bob Bob, since you are obviously intelligent and generally well-informed, it puzzles me how difficult it is to get you to understand certain fairly obvious points. Example: why do you make belittling remarks about a fellow Aztec fan's job-related duties? Do you have something against supply clerks? Is the job of supply clerk to be considered beneath contempt? Bob, it just does not make a bit of difference what somebody did. Why bring it up? AzWm That would be opposed to Pooh referring to me as a "sawed-off runt" and making disparaging comments about planners? Trolling is something we both do and I think we both let it roll off our backs. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on May 23, 2011 11:55:46 GMT -8
Bob, since you are obviously intelligent and generally well-informed, it puzzles me how difficult it is to get you to understand certain fairly obvious points. Example: why do you make belittling remarks about a fellow Aztec fan's job-related duties? Do you have something against supply clerks? Is the job of supply clerk to be considered beneath contempt? Bob, it just does not make a bit of difference what somebody did. Why bring it up? AzWm That would be opposed to Pooh referring to me as a "sawed-off runt" and making disparaging comments about planners? Trolling is something we both do and I think we both let it roll off our backs. =Bob =Bob is right about the back and forth. I try to keep things factual. I have never made up anything about his vocation nor his size. I can find enough true stuff to rile him up. |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on May 23, 2011 15:27:32 GMT -8
That would be opposed to Pooh referring to me as a "sawed-off runt" and making disparaging comments about planners? Trolling is something we both do and I think we both let it roll off our backs. =Bob =Bob is right about the back and forth. I try to keep things factual. I have never made up anything about his vocation nor his size. I can find enough true stuff to rile him up. True that I'm not particularly tall. However, your opinion of planners is nothing more than an opinion and really not based in any experience you've had with them in terms of developing land. You have not walked a mile in my shoes or been accused by one side of taking bribes while accused by the other side of conspiring to lower land values so the first side could buy it on the cheap. You may not believe it, but putting oneself in that position does take some balls because you never know who is going to attack you. Obviously it comes nowhere near the huge balls Stu and all our warriors possess, but it's not all that much fun to do what you consider to be a really good job and then spend 8 hours in a hearing being vilified by people who really don't understand the concept of mediating between competing demands. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on May 23, 2011 21:24:27 GMT -8
Remarks about a person's physical attributes are not welcome on this board.
AzWm
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2011 9:17:47 GMT -8
Remarks about a person's physical attributes are not welcome on this board. AzWm so we can't call =bob a "troll" ? :-) |
|
|
|
Post by William L. Rupp on May 24, 2011 11:20:04 GMT -8
Remarks about a person's physical attributes are not welcome on this board. AzWm so we can't call =bob a "troll" ? :-) Here's your out with respect to this particular issue. There is no agreed-upon physical description of a troll, at least not in the Internet world. Calling Bob, or anyone, a troll may be tendentious but it is not offensive as calling someone a fatty or butt-ugly would be. AzWm |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on May 24, 2011 12:00:15 GMT -8
so we can't call =bob a "troll" ? :-) Here's your out with respect to this particular issue. There is no agreed-upon physical description of a troll, at least not in the Internet world. Calling Bob, or anyone, a troll may be tendentious but it is not offensive as calling someone a fatty or butt-ugly would be. AzWm Is telling the truth out?  If that is out but letting folks make up things that are equally or even more offensive makes me wonder.  |
|
If that is out but letting folks make up things that are equally or even more offensive makes me wonder. 