|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Feb 25, 2011 9:26:39 GMT -8
innocuous/waztec.... I really don't give a small fart about what you think. You call me angry. Fine. I'm nowhere near as bitter as you are. Tell us how many people have gone to the ovens because of the Kochs. And then, tell us what a prince of a man George Soros is. reason.com/blog/2011/02/24/evil-koch-bros-supportLOL You give us a link to a blog that quotes another blog. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 25, 2011 15:04:41 GMT -8
innocuous/waztec.... I really don't give a small fart about what you think. You call me angry. Fine. I'm nowhere near as bitter as you are. Tell us how many people have gone to the ovens because of the Kochs. And then, tell us what a prince of a man George Soros is. reason.com/blog/2011/02/24/evil-koch-bros-supportLOL You give us a link to a blog that quotes another blog. LOL.... And the significance of that is......? I think the libtards have concluded that the incessant Palin bashing is starting to wear a little thin, and they recognize a need for a new booger-man. So they have decided to try a little Kochsocking. They probably think that by socking Kochs, it could result in a BONus by deflecting some attention from their scumbag-Hungarian-Nazi-collaborating-sugar-daddy. I doubt the libtard Kochsockers will get much cream out of it. |
|
|
|
Post by inocuace on Feb 25, 2011 16:39:14 GMT -8
innocuous/waztec.... I really don't give a small fart about what you think. You call me angry. Fine. I'm nowhere near as bitter as you are. Tell us how many people have gone to the ovens because of the Kochs. And then, tell us what a prince of a man George Soros is. reason.com/blog/2011/02/24/evil-koch-bros-supportOK. I acknowledge what you say. I apologize for exciting you the way I obviously have. |
|
|
|
Post by inocuace on Feb 25, 2011 16:47:51 GMT -8
LOL You give us a link to a blog that quotes another blog. And the significance of that is......? I think the libtards have concluded that the incessant Palin bashing is starting to wear a little thin, and they recognize a need for a new booger-man. So they have decided to try a little Kochsocking. They probably think that by socking Kochs, it could result in a BONus by deflecting some attention from their scumbag-Hungarian-Nazi-collaborating-sugar-daddy. I doubt the libtard Kochsockers will get much cream out of it. "libtard Kochsockers" ? Interesting choice of terms. I wonder why those particular terms were on your mind? You would impress me more, though, if you would come up with more creative zingers. I, for one, like to be wowed when I am being insulted. Come on show us some creativity! Show us some spunk! Show us some of that sclerotic intolerance for disagreement that makes the U.S. Conservative movement the envy of all who dwell with Australopithecus on the savanna! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 26, 2011 15:24:12 GMT -8
And the significance of that is......? I think the libtards have concluded that the incessant Palin bashing is starting to wear a little thin, and they recognize a need for a new booger-man. So they have decided to try a little Kochsocking. They probably think that by socking Kochs, it could result in a BONus by deflecting some attention from their scumbag-Hungarian-Nazi-collaborating-sugar-daddy. I doubt the libtard Kochsockers will get much cream out of it. "libtard Kochsockers" ? Interesting choice of terms. I wonder why those particular terms were on your mind? You would impress me more, though, if you would come up with more creative zingers. I, for one, like to be wowed when I am being insulted. Come on show us some creativity! Show us some spunk! Show us some of that sclerotic intolerance for disagreement that makes the U.S. Conservative movement the envy of all who dwell with Australopithecus on the savanna! ;D  I did not insult you. The post you quote was not even in response to anything you have written. Besides, personal insults are forbidden on here. I'd say the terms "libtard" and "Kochsocker" are in the same category as, say, "wing-nut", which, while not encouraged, are acceptable when directed at a political position rather than an individual. www.aztecmesa.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=np&thread=10034&page=2#156594I suppose, however, you should be entitled to wear whatever shoe you think fits. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Feb 26, 2011 16:03:06 GMT -8
"libtard Kochsockers" ? Interesting choice of terms. I wonder why those particular terms were on your mind? You would impress me more, though, if you would come up with more creative zingers. I, for one, like to be wowed when I am being insulted. Come on show us some creativity! Show us some spunk! Show us some of that sclerotic intolerance for disagreement that makes the U.S. Conservative movement the envy of all who dwell with Australopithecus on the savanna! ;D I did not insult you. The post you quote was not even in response to anything you have written. Besides, personal insults are forbidden on here. I'd say the terms "libtard" and "Kochsocker" are in the same category as, say, "wing-nut", which, while not encouraged, are acceptable when directed at a political position rather than an individual. www.aztecmesa.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=np&thread=10034&page=2#156594I suppose, however, you should be entitled to wear whatever shoe you think fits. ;D I think you are working to hard. A simple label of "liberal" would do. I think just about all folks understand that "retard" is part of a huge subset of accurate, but derogatory labels that are understood when you use "liberal". You know that must be true when they are now trying to get you to call them "Progressive". I often fall into that mode myself when it is not necessary. You know that a liberal is envious and awestruck when in the company of a Conservative. But I still at times go beyond the simple use of "liberal". It just is not needed. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 26, 2011 16:18:51 GMT -8
I did not insult you. The post you quote was not even in response to anything you have written. Besides, personal insults are forbidden on here. I'd say the terms "libtard" and "Kochsocker" are in the same category as, say, "wing-nut", which, while not encouraged, are acceptable when directed at a political position rather than an individual. www.aztecmesa.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=np&thread=10034&page=2#156594I suppose, however, you should be entitled to wear whatever shoe you think fits. ;D I think you are working to hard. A simple label of "liberal" would do. I think just about all folks understand that "retard" is part of a huge subset of accurate, but derogatory labels that are understood when you use "liberal". You know that must be true when they are now trying to get you to call them "Progressive". I often fall into that mode myself when it is not necessary. You know that a liberal is envious and awestruck when in the company of a Conservative. But I still at times go beyond the simple use of "liberal". It just is not needed. Well, I never considered that the word "libtard" was a contraction of "liberal retards". Seriously, I always thought it meant "liberal bastards". My apologies are extended to retarded people. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Feb 26, 2011 17:01:36 GMT -8
I think you are working to hard. A simple label of "liberal" would do. I think just about all folks understand that "retard" is part of a huge subset of accurate, but derogatory labels that are understood when you use "liberal". You know that must be true when they are now trying to get you to call them "Progressive". I often fall into that mode myself when it is not necessary. You know that a liberal is envious and awestruck when in the company of a Conservative. But I still at times go beyond the simple use of "liberal". It just is not needed. Well, I never considered that the word "libtard" was a contraction of "liberal retards". Seriously, I always thought it meant "liberal bastards". My apologies are extended to retarded people. It means that as well. We are better off not exploring all the things included in "liberal". I guess that apologies are appropriate since they are the way they are through no fault of their own. |
|
|
|
Post by inocuace on Feb 27, 2011 9:44:49 GMT -8
"libtard Kochsockers" ? Interesting choice of terms. I wonder why those particular terms were on your mind? You would impress me more, though, if you would come up with more creative zingers. I, for one, like to be wowed when I am being insulted. Come on show us some creativity! Show us some spunk! Show us some of that sclerotic intolerance for disagreement that makes the U.S. Conservative movement the envy of all who dwell with Australopithecus on the savanna! ;D I did not insult you. The post you quote was not even in response to anything you have written. Besides, personal insults are forbidden on here. I'd say the terms "libtard" and "Kochsocker" are in the same category as, say, "wing-nut", which, while not encouraged, are acceptable when directed at a political position rather than an individual. www.aztecmesa.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=np&thread=10034&page=2#156594I suppose, however, you should be entitled to wear whatever shoe you think fits. ;D "I did not insult you." Your characterizations are crude and they convey a level of antipathy and intolerance that take my breath away. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 27, 2011 14:17:42 GMT -8
I did not insult you. The post you quote was not even in response to anything you have written. Besides, personal insults are forbidden on here. I'd say the terms "libtard" and "Kochsocker" are in the same category as, say, "wing-nut", which, while not encouraged, are acceptable when directed at a political position rather than an individual. www.aztecmesa.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=np&thread=10034&page=2#156594I suppose, however, you should be entitled to wear whatever shoe you think fits. ;D "I did not insult you." Your characterizations are crude and they convey a level of antipathy and intolerance that take my breath away. "antipathy"? "intolerance"? Nahhhhh.... I'm just having a little fun here. And believe me, making you dance like a marionette while taking your breath away is every bit as amusing as it is satisfying. |
|
|
|
Post by inocuace on Mar 1, 2011 20:10:27 GMT -8
"I did not insult you." Your characterizations are crude and they convey a level of antipathy and intolerance that take my breath away. "antipathy"? "intolerance"? Nahhhhh.... I'm just having a little fun here. And believe me, making you dance like a marionette while taking your breath away is every bit as amusing as it is satisfying. You are just tedious. And your humor betrays you. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Mar 2, 2011 14:52:50 GMT -8
"antipathy"? "intolerance"? Nahhhhh.... I'm just having a little fun here. And believe me, making you dance like a marionette while taking your breath away is every bit as amusing as it is satisfying. You are just tedious. And your humor betrays you. And you are just supercillious. Your risible pedantry betrays you. Please do keep it up, though. The laughs are priceless. |
|
