|
|
Post by davdesid on Jan 31, 2011 14:57:54 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 31, 2011 20:22:20 GMT -8
This decision is along the lines that I think are correct. The final will be a year or so away in front of the Supreme Court.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Feb 1, 2011 8:27:08 GMT -8
Though this justification looks to have more merit, I doubt that either of the two will be upheld by the SCOTUS. Government has been regulating the economy for a century. It has not been doing a very good job of it, but it has been trying never the less.
The first decision simply does not hold water.
|
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Feb 1, 2011 9:14:43 GMT -8
This decision is along the lines that I think are correct. The final will be a year or so away in front of the Supreme Court. Another decision by an activist judge. No basis in law. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 1, 2011 15:05:54 GMT -8
This decision is along the lines that I think are correct. The final will be a year or so away in front of the Supreme Court. Another decision by an activist judge. No basis in law. Basis is in the Constitution. Which, by the way, IS law. Judge Vinson’s decision is a body blow to Obamacare that the law will never recover from. The New York Times claims the decision “even the score at 2 to 2,” and The Washington Post “reports”: “Four suits have now been decided on their merits—two rulings upholding the law and, with Monday’s decision, two finding all or part of it unconstitutional.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Only two Obamacare cases have moved passed preliminary motions and reached the merits of the case: Judge Hudson’s Virginia decision and Judge Vinson’s decision yesterday. More importantly, the parties involved in yesterday’s case make it unique. A majority of all states in the union (26) have joined forces with the National Federation of Independent Businesses to challenge this intolerable act. Heritage Foundation legal scholar Robert Alt comments: “If not completely unprecedented, the very fact that more than half the states marched into federal court on behalf of themselves and their citizens to challenge an unconstitutional federal program falls into the category of ‘beyond any recent memory.’” www.tngovwatch.org/2011/02/4061/Lump it. |
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Feb 2, 2011 13:44:54 GMT -8
Another decision by an activist judge. No basis in law. Basis is in the Constitution. Which, by the way, IS law. Judge Vinson’s decision is a body blow to Obamacare that the law will never recover from. The New York Times claims the decision “even the score at 2 to 2,” and The Washington Post “reports”: “Four suits have now been decided on their merits—two rulings upholding the law and, with Monday’s decision, two finding all or part of it unconstitutional.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Only two Obamacare cases have moved passed preliminary motions and reached the merits of the case: Judge Hudson’s Virginia decision and Judge Vinson’s decision yesterday. More importantly, the parties involved in yesterday’s case make it unique. A majority of all states in the union (26) have joined forces with the National Federation of Independent Businesses to challenge this intolerable act. Heritage Foundation legal scholar Robert Alt comments: “If not completely unprecedented, the very fact that more than half the states marched into federal court on behalf of themselves and their citizens to challenge an unconstitutional federal program falls into the category of ‘beyond any recent memory.’” www.tngovwatch.org/2011/02/4061/Lump it. Nice link from wing-nut site.  |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 2, 2011 14:06:27 GMT -8
Basis is in the Constitution. Which, by the way, IS law. Judge Vinson’s decision is a body blow to Obamacare that the law will never recover from. The New York Times claims the decision “even the score at 2 to 2,” and The Washington Post “reports”: “Four suits have now been decided on their merits—two rulings upholding the law and, with Monday’s decision, two finding all or part of it unconstitutional.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Only two Obamacare cases have moved passed preliminary motions and reached the merits of the case: Judge Hudson’s Virginia decision and Judge Vinson’s decision yesterday. More importantly, the parties involved in yesterday’s case make it unique. A majority of all states in the union (26) have joined forces with the National Federation of Independent Businesses to challenge this intolerable act. Heritage Foundation legal scholar Robert Alt comments: “If not completely unprecedented, the very fact that more than half the states marched into federal court on behalf of themselves and their citizens to challenge an unconstitutional federal program falls into the category of ‘beyond any recent memory.’” www.tngovwatch.org/2011/02/4061/Lump it. Nice link from wing-nut site. Nice link from any site, when the substance contains info you moonbats are incapable of refuting. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Feb 2, 2011 17:08:58 GMT -8
Basis is in the Constitution. Which, by the way, IS law. Judge Vinson’s decision is a body blow to Obamacare that the law will never recover from. The New York Times claims the decision “even the score at 2 to 2,” and The Washington Post “reports”: “Four suits have now been decided on their merits—two rulings upholding the law and, with Monday’s decision, two finding all or part of it unconstitutional.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Only two Obamacare cases have moved passed preliminary motions and reached the merits of the case: Judge Hudson’s Virginia decision and Judge Vinson’s decision yesterday. More importantly, the parties involved in yesterday’s case make it unique. A majority of all states in the union (26) have joined forces with the National Federation of Independent Businesses to challenge this intolerable act. Heritage Foundation legal scholar Robert Alt comments: “If not completely unprecedented, the very fact that more than half the states marched into federal court on behalf of themselves and their citizens to challenge an unconstitutional federal program falls into the category of ‘beyond any recent memory.’” www.tngovwatch.org/2011/02/4061/Lump it. Nice link from wing-nut site. A source that documents very convincingly and in a manner hard to refute is called a wing-nut site? Some how I think we have our definitions a little mixed up. When events and public opinion go against lefties they resort to one line insults. |
|
