|
Post by aztecmusician on Feb 16, 2024 11:37:51 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 16, 2024 11:45:12 GMT -8
John Durham? The same John Durham who falsified evidence and lied to Congress? The same John Durham that William Barr admitted was hired to shut down the Mueller investigation? Hard-hitting stuff, truly.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Feb 16, 2024 13:24:31 GMT -8
....and 1 in 3 Republicans (magas) believe the Taylor Swift conspiracy theory.just a tick behind "the election was stolen" crowd. "I love the poorly educated".
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Feb 16, 2024 19:03:39 GMT -8
....and 1 in 3 Republicans (magas) believe the Taylor Swift conspiracy theory.just a tick behind "the election was stolen" crowd. "I love the poorly educated". Whatever you do for a living, I’ll wager you’re not a comedy writer. In all seriousness, the most powerful surveillance organizations in the world were directed at American citizens. Put aside your political views and affiliations for a second and consider how disquieting that truly is. This heavy handed approach is Right out of the Soviet Union. The government military/espionage complex aimed at U. S. citizens, a dangerous policy for anyone outside the protected political class, regardless of party affiliation or voting record. That is why Obama categorically denied this happened.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 16, 2024 19:10:25 GMT -8
....and 1 in 3 Republicans (magas) believe the Taylor Swift conspiracy theory.just a tick behind "the election was stolen" crowd. "I love the poorly educated". Whatever you do for a living, I’ll wager you’re not a comedy writer. In all seriousness, the most powerful surveillance organizations in the world were directed at American citizens. Put aside your political views and affiliations for a second and consider how disquieting that truly is. This heavy handed approach is Right out of the Soviet Union. The government military/espionage complex aimed at U. S. citizens, a dangerous policy for anyone outside the protected political class, regardless of party affiliation or voting record. That is why Obama categorically denied this happened. Durham isn't a credible individual, though. He was explicitly hired with the sole purpose of shutting down investigations into the former president. Barr admitted this in an interview.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Feb 16, 2024 20:12:22 GMT -8
....and 1 in 3 Republicans (magas) believe the Taylor Swift conspiracy theory.just a tick behind "the election was stolen" crowd. "I love the poorly educated". Whatever you do for a living, I’ll wager you’re not a comedy writer. In all seriousness, the most powerful surveillance organizations in the world were directed at American citizens. Put aside your political views and affiliations for a second and consider how disquieting that truly is. This heavy handed approach is Right out of the Soviet Union. The government military/espionage complex aimed at U. S. citizens, a dangerous policy for anyone outside the protected political class, regardless of party affiliation or voting record. That is why Obama categorically denied this happened. uh...its in the polling..look it up re: Republicans and Taylor Swift conspiracy..actually you are writing comedy when you link Gutfeld....pretty dumb "base".
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Feb 16, 2024 21:25:11 GMT -8
Whatever you do for a living, I’ll wager you’re not a comedy writer. In all seriousness, the most powerful surveillance organizations in the world were directed at American citizens. Put aside your political views and affiliations for a second and consider how disquieting that truly is. This heavy handed approach is Right out of the Soviet Union. The government military/espionage complex aimed at U. S. citizens, a dangerous policy for anyone outside the protected political class, regardless of party affiliation or voting record. That is why Obama categorically denied this happened. Durham isn't a credible individual, though. He was explicitly hired with the sole purpose of shutting down investigations into the former president. Barr admitted this in an interview. All of your opinions of credibility aside, the main point is the intelligence agencies were turned on the Trump campaign in 2016. That is the elephant in the room you demmy lefties won’t address. We live in a political environment where senile democrat politicians have their crimes tossed out while republican politicians get the supervillain/mass murderer treatment while punished to the full extent of the democrat interpretation of the law. What’s next? Trump get hit with a trillion dollar fine?? That’s how absurd the Democrat controlled government and justice system has become.
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Feb 16, 2024 21:32:53 GMT -8
Trump probably was spied upon, he had a colonoscopy.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Feb 17, 2024 6:45:32 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 17, 2024 8:28:34 GMT -8
Durham isn't a credible individual, though. He was explicitly hired with the sole purpose of shutting down investigations into the former president. Barr admitted this in an interview. All of your opinions of credibility aside, the main point is the intelligence agencies were turned on the Trump campaign in 2016. That is the elephant in the room you demmy lefties won’t address. We live in a political environment where senile democrat politicians have their crimes tossed out while republican politicians get the supervillain/mass murderer treatment while punished to the full extent of the democrat interpretation of the law. What’s next? Trump get hit with a trillion dollar fine?? That’s how absurd the Democrat controlled government and justice system has become. Not my opinion. It's on live video. The desperation to turn Trump into a victim is just....typical.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Feb 17, 2024 8:53:56 GMT -8
Whatever you do for a living, I’ll wager you’re not a comedy writer. In all seriousness, the most powerful surveillance organizations in the world were directed at American citizens. Put aside your political views and affiliations for a second and consider how disquieting that truly is. This heavy handed approach is Right out of the Soviet Union. The government military/espionage complex aimed at U. S. citizens, a dangerous policy for anyone outside the protected political class, regardless of party affiliation or voting record. That is why Obama categorically denied this happened. Durham isn't a credible individual, though. He was explicitly hired with the sole purpose of shutting down investigations into the former president. Barr admitted this in an interview. Do you mean the Durham that exposed that the FBI had to offer a bribe...err...an incentive...to Steele so he would aver the lies he provided about Trump were true (and the lies that the FBI certified as true in the FISA warrant on Page) and Steele declined to do that knowing they were lies all along? Or do you mean the Durham that exposed the FBI's CHS Danchenko was lying to the FBI about Trump and when he procescuted Danchenko for lying to the FBI, Danchenko exposed to us that the FBI knew that he was lying about Trump from the getgo? That Durham? Wholy incredible!
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 17, 2024 9:01:18 GMT -8
Durham isn't a credible individual, though. He was explicitly hired with the sole purpose of shutting down investigations into the former president. Barr admitted this in an interview. Do you mean the Durham that exposed that the FBI had to offer a bribe...err...an incentive...to Steele so he would aver the lies he provided about Trump were true (and the lies that the FBI certified as true in the FISA warrant on Page) and Steele declined to do that knowing they were lies all along? Or do you mean the Durham that exposed the FBI's CHS Danchenko was lying to the FBI about Trump and when he procescuted Danchenko for lying to the FBI, Danchenko exposed to us that the FBI knew that he was lying about Trump from the getgo? That Durham? Wholy incredible! I mean the Durham that lied to Congress, like I said earlier.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Feb 17, 2024 13:07:26 GMT -8
Do you mean the Durham that exposed that the FBI had to offer a bribe...err...an incentive...to Steele so he would aver the lies he provided about Trump were true (and the lies that the FBI certified as true in the FISA warrant on Page) and Steele declined to do that knowing they were lies all along? Or do you mean the Durham that exposed the FBI's CHS Danchenko was lying to the FBI about Trump and when he procescuted Danchenko for lying to the FBI, Danchenko exposed to us that the FBI knew that he was lying about Trump from the getgo? That Durham? Wholy incredible! I mean the Durham that lied to Congress, like I said earlier. Oh, I thought you meant the Durham that exposed how the DoJ's Klinesmith falsified documents in attempt to cover for the FBI's fraudulent FISA Warrant. Or perhaps it was the Durham that exposed that the FBI knew within hours that the allegation of improper ties between Trump and Alpha Bank was a lie yet told no one and allowed that lie to circulate as the truth unabated in True Believer-ville. And as for lying to Congress, if true, isn't that illegal and shouldn't there be an indictment? I searched and found nothing on that Durham.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 17, 2024 14:06:12 GMT -8
I mean the Durham that lied to Congress, like I said earlier. Oh, I thought you meant the Durham that exposed how the DoJ's Klinesmith falsified documents in attempt to cover for the FBI's fraudulent FISA Warrant. Or perhaps it was the Durham that exposed that the FBI knew within hours that the allegation of improper ties between Trump and Alpha Bank was a lie yet told no one and allowed that lie to circulate as the truth unabated in True Believer-ville. And as for lying to Congress, if true, isn't that illegal and shouldn't there be an indictment? I searched and found nothing on that Durham. Who was going to indict him? The guy who hired him? Lol. Let's be real here. Durham was installed to protect Trump. He investigated for four years and came up with two indictments, both of which ended in acquittal.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Feb 20, 2024 17:46:18 GMT -8
Oh, I thought you meant the Durham that exposed how the DoJ's Klinesmith falsified documents in attempt to cover for the FBI's fraudulent FISA Warrant. Or perhaps it was the Durham that exposed that the FBI knew within hours that the allegation of improper ties between Trump and Alpha Bank was a lie yet told no one and allowed that lie to circulate as the truth unabated in True Believer-ville. And as for lying to Congress, if true, isn't that illegal and shouldn't there be an indictment? I searched and found nothing on that Durham. Who was going to indict him? The guy who hired him? Lol. Let's be real here. Durham was installed to protect Trump. He investigated for four years and came up with two indictments, both of which ended in acquittal. Let's really get real here. Who was President when Durham testified to Congress? He was telling the truth as he exposed the corruption in the DoJ and FBI.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 20, 2024 17:51:42 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Feb 22, 2024 7:13:25 GMT -8
And speaking of the FBI and their exposed wrong doings, we now realize that our Federal Keystone Kops have groomed, paid and trusted two foreigners, both with ties to Russia, and ushered them into positions of influence for two of our Presidental elections. And you could say three as the actions and fallout of the FBI and Igor Danchenko started before the Clinton Trump election and were still being featured in the news for the Biden Trump election. When you look at the Alexander Smirnov indictment, you can see how he was in bed with the FBI since 2010 and many, many times since then. The FBI helped these clowns influence our Presidential elections but but it's all Popadopoulos' and Grassley's fault
|
|