|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 14, 2022 8:03:42 GMT -8
Broken wrist, per AJ Preller.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Mar 14, 2022 8:22:55 GMT -8
Was it a baseball injury, or more motorcycle mishaps?
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 14, 2022 8:32:37 GMT -8
Was it a baseball injury, or more motorcycle mishaps? Injury occurred in the offseason. |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Mar 14, 2022 9:00:28 GMT -8
Wonder how much the Padres paid to insure Fernando's contract?
|
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Mar 14, 2022 9:04:57 GMT -8
Was it a baseball injury, or more motorcycle mishaps? Acee claimed in his article in the U-T that Tatis started feeling pain in the wrist "shortly thereafter" the accident. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 14, 2022 10:02:37 GMT -8
Was it a baseball injury, or more motorcycle mishaps? Acee claimed in his article in the U-T that Tatis started feeling pain in the wrist "shortly thereafter" the accident. He also claimed that the Padres were going to sign Nelson Cruz yesterday. |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Mar 14, 2022 10:47:05 GMT -8
Acee claimed in his article in the U-T that Tatis started feeling pain in the wrist "shortly thereafter" the accident. He also claimed that the Padres were going to sign Nelson Cruz yesterday. He does "claim" quite a bit. Occasionally, one of his "claims" are correct. Too bad there was a lockout going on during this time, as maybe the team could have had more influence on what should, or could, have been done to limit the time away from the field for Tatis. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 14, 2022 10:50:10 GMT -8
He also claimed that the Padres were going to sign Nelson Cruz yesterday. He does "claim" quite a bit. Occasionally, one of his "claims" are correct. Too bad there was a lockout going on during this time, as maybe the team could have had more influence on what should, or could, have been done to limit the time away from the field for Tatis. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 15, 2022 7:48:44 GMT -8
Playoff odds came out this morning. Padres sitting at 78%, 2nd in the NL West. Guess the algorithms don't share the doom and gloom.
|
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Mar 15, 2022 9:39:52 GMT -8
Playoff odds came out this morning. Padres sitting at 78%, 2nd in the NL West. Guess the algorithms don't share the doom and gloom. Weren't they sitting pretty before last season started? The algorithms don't play the game. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 15, 2022 9:56:30 GMT -8
Playoff odds came out this morning. Padres sitting at 78%, 2nd in the NL West. Guess the algorithms don't share the doom and gloom. Weren't they sitting pretty before last season started? The algorithms don't play the game. The playoff predictors tend to be pretty accurate - I don't think a historically bad collapse with an inexperienced manager and a myriad of injuries coming out of the pandemic is indicative of the true talent level of the team. This is the same that was 63-47 through 110 games last year before the ceiling caved in. |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Mar 15, 2022 10:32:06 GMT -8
Weren't they sitting pretty before last season started? The algorithms don't play the game. The playoff predictors tend to be pretty accurate - I don't think a historically bad collapse with an inexperienced manager and a myriad of injuries coming out of the pandemic is indicative of the true talent level of the team. This is the same that was 63-47 through 110 games last year before the ceiling caved in. They were 67-49 (high-water mark of the season...then went 12-34). It will be interesting to see what the pieces that weren't available last year will do this season, but I prefer to see the play on the field versus algorithms. I've seen over/under on wins for the Padres at 91.5 for this upcoming season. Based on the current roster, I would take the under. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 15, 2022 14:11:50 GMT -8
The playoff predictors tend to be pretty accurate - I don't think a historically bad collapse with an inexperienced manager and a myriad of injuries coming out of the pandemic is indicative of the true talent level of the team. This is the same that was 63-47 through 110 games last year before the ceiling caved in. They were 67-49 (high-water mark of the season...then went 12-34). It will be interesting to see what the pieces that weren't available last year will do this season, but I prefer to see the play on the field versus algorithms. I've seen over/under on wins for the Padres at 91.5 for this upcoming season. Based on the current roster, I would take the under. Good thing is the roster will be changing here shortly. The team that went 12-34 was without (for stretches or entirely): Paddack, Snell, Darvish, Clevinger, Pomeranz, Lamet....and the list goes on. And that's just on the pitching side. Current projections have them at 89-90 wins. |
|
|
|
Post by azteca on Mar 15, 2022 15:03:36 GMT -8
They were 67-49 (high-water mark of the season...then went 12-34). It will be interesting to see what the pieces that weren't available last year will do this season, but I prefer to see the play on the field versus algorithms. I've seen over/under on wins for the Padres at 91.5 for this upcoming season. Based on the current roster, I would take the under. Good thing is the roster will be changing here shortly. The team that went 12-34 was without (for stretches or entirely): Paddack, Snell, Darvish, Clevinger, Pomeranz, Lamet....and the list goes on. And that's just on the pitching side. Current projections have them at 89-90 wins. Projections mean little as has been shown in the past |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Mar 15, 2022 15:15:27 GMT -8
They were 67-49 (high-water mark of the season...then went 12-34). It will be interesting to see what the pieces that weren't available last year will do this season, but I prefer to see the play on the field versus algorithms. I've seen over/under on wins for the Padres at 91.5 for this upcoming season. Based on the current roster, I would take the under. Good thing is the roster will be changing here shortly. The team that went 12-34 was without (for stretches or entirely): Paddack, Snell, Darvish, Clevinger, Pomeranz, Lamet....and the list goes on. And that's just on the pitching side. Current projections have them at 89-90 wins. Cool. The under it is. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Mar 15, 2022 15:15:53 GMT -8
Playoff odds came out this morning. Padres sitting at 78%, 2nd in the NL West. Guess the algorithms don't share the doom and gloom. Algorithm's, ok. I'll go with what they say. Sheesh. I'll be on pins and needles during the stretch without Tatis as will MANY others, and rightfully so. Like Aardvark said, they don't play the game. Having said that, I hope we go undefeated during this stretch, and specific players rise to the occasion. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 15, 2022 20:06:28 GMT -8
Good thing is the roster will be changing here shortly. The team that went 12-34 was without (for stretches or entirely): Paddack, Snell, Darvish, Clevinger, Pomeranz, Lamet....and the list goes on. And that's just on the pitching side. Current projections have them at 89-90 wins. Projections mean little as has been shown in the past This is always amusing to me. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 15, 2022 20:07:14 GMT -8
Playoff odds came out this morning. Padres sitting at 78%, 2nd in the NL West. Guess the algorithms don't share the doom and gloom. Algorithm's, ok. I'll go with what they say. Sheesh. I'll be on pins and needles during the stretch without Tatis as will MANY others, and rightfully so. Like Aardvark said, they don't play the game. Having said that, I hope we go undefeated during this stretch, and specific players rise to the occasion. Your posts always include generic things like "many others" like that actually matters. Who cares? |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Mar 15, 2022 21:23:03 GMT -8
Algorithm's, ok. I'll go with what they say. Sheesh. I'll be on pins and needles during the stretch without Tatis as will MANY others, and rightfully so. Like Aardvark said, they don't play the game. Having said that, I hope we go undefeated during this stretch, and specific players rise to the occasion. Your posts always include generic things like "many others" like that actually matters. Who cares? Uh huh. You must care, since you're all bent about about it. I know this is hitting a nerve with you, especially when you're actually going to go with "algorithm's" as your evidence, and people are saying algorithm's don't play on the field. So, just chill out, and we'll all hope they perform well without Tatis. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 15, 2022 21:49:36 GMT -8
Your posts always include generic things like "many others" like that actually matters. Who cares? Uh huh. You must care, since you're all bent about about it. I know this is hitting a nerve with you, especially when you're actually going to go with "algorithm's" as your evidence, and people are saying algorithm's don't play on the field. So, just chill out, and we'll all hope they perform well without Tatis. All bent about it because I asked a question? Lol. Okay. Citing "algorithms" as my evidence...because algorithms are plugged into projection models. That's literally how projections are derived. Do you think people just guess and throw out random numbers or what? I appreciate that people want to play games on the field, but that process hasn't started yet. Oy vey. |
|
