|
Post by davdesid on Feb 19, 2019 11:09:56 GMT -8
It will end up with SCOTUS. Let them uphold his executive order and set the precedent. Then the next Democratic President can declare a national emergency and mandate Medicare for all. Works for me. Shouldn't get that far. The first lower court judge it comes before should ask "has Congress tried to remedy this themselves under the governing law?" If not, then get out my court. Unless the judge is a partisan hack. I'm sure the left will find one, in which case Trump should just flip him the bird, and write a letter explaining why, with a copy to the SCOTUS recommending they straighten out the rogue judge who is acting ultra vires.
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Feb 19, 2019 15:19:06 GMT -8
It’s funny how democrats wanted a wall just a few years ago. The only reason they don’t want one now(and not just because Trump wants it) is because they are imploding from within and losing their moderate base. They need these illegals to beef up the population and get fraudulent votes . They don’t Give a $#!+ about these people other than to keep an ignorant lower class beholding to them to stay in power. They could care less about the law and America, IMO. So I don’t care how they build the wall, just do it. To me these people are just a bunch of thieves, so kick them all out including their snotty kids which they use as pawns. If that sounds cruel....tuff. We are either a nation of laws or we are not. Illegals have no rights until they come here legally. Even Cesar Chavez hated these clowns. So get it done.......period.
|
|
|
Post by sandiegopete on Feb 19, 2019 17:11:22 GMT -8
It’s funny how democrats wanted a wall just a few years ago. The only reason they don’t want one now(and not just because Trump wants it) is because they are imploding from within and losing their moderate base. They need these illegals to beef up the population and get fraudulent votes . They don’t Give a $#!+ about these people other than to keep an ignorant lower class beholding to them to stay in power. They could care less about the law and America, IMO. So I don’t care how they build the wall, just do it. To me these people are just a bunch of thieves, so kick them all out including their snotty kids which they use as pawns. If that sounds cruel....tuff. We are either a nation of laws or we are not. Illegals have no rights until they come here legally. Even Cesar Chavez hated these clowns. So get it done.......period. Typical semantical twist from the nutty right. The vote was for a fence, not a wall. Can't you make your claim without lying? www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/apr/23/mick-mulvaney/fact-check-did-top-democrats-vote-border-wall-2006/
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Feb 19, 2019 20:13:14 GMT -8
It will end up with SCOTUS. Let them uphold his executive order and set the precedent. Then the next Democratic President can declare a national emergency and mandate Medicare for all. Works for me. Shouldn't get that far. The first lower court judge it comes before should ask "has Congress tried to remedy this themselves under the governing law?" If not, then get out my court. Unless the judge is a partisan hack. I'm sure the left will find one, in which case Trump should just flip him the bird, and write a letter explaining why, with a copy to the SCOTUS recommending they straighten out the rogue judge who is acting ultra vires. I'm pretty sure Putin's puppet will get the big finger soon. that's why I have a special bottle on ice in the fridge. I'm going to drink it in my driveway, so when the cult in my neighborhood drives by they can see it..including the MF who threatened me with a pellet gun 10 years ago..because I told him who I voted for.
|
|
|
Post by sandiegopete on Feb 19, 2019 20:34:12 GMT -8
It will end up with SCOTUS. Let them uphold his executive order and set the precedent. Then the next Democratic President can declare a national emergency and mandate Medicare for all. Works for me. Shouldn't get that far. The first lower court judge it comes before should ask "has Congress tried to remedy this themselves under the governing law?" If not, then get out my court. Unless the judge is a partisan hack. I'm sure the left will find one, in which case Trump should just flip him the bird, and write a letter explaining why, with a copy to the SCOTUS recommending they straighten out the rogue judge who is acting ultra vires. If a judge does not rule in favor of Trump the only possibility is that the judge is a "partisan hack". I just love the desperate propaganda tactics of the radical far right wingers.
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Feb 20, 2019 6:46:50 GMT -8
Shouldn't get that far. The first lower court judge it comes before should ask "has Congress tried to remedy this themselves under the governing law?" If not, then get out my court. Unless the judge is a partisan hack. I'm sure the left will find one, in which case Trump should just flip him the bird, and write a letter explaining why, with a copy to the SCOTUS recommending they straighten out the rogue judge who is acting ultra vires. If a judge does not rule in favor of Trump the only possibility is that the judge is a "partisan hack". I just love the desperate propaganda tactics of the radical far right wingers. He can google latin phrases and has a JD from Aztecmesa, so I’d think he knows a liiiiiiittle bit more about judicial jurisprudence than a sitting judge.
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 20, 2019 11:48:50 GMT -8
Shouldn't get that far. The first lower court judge it comes before should ask "has Congress tried to remedy this themselves under the governing law?" If not, then get out my court. Unless the judge is a partisan hack. I'm sure the left will find one, in which case Trump should just flip him the bird, and write a letter explaining why, with a copy to the SCOTUS recommending they straighten out the rogue judge who is acting ultra vires. I'm pretty sure Putin's puppet will get the big finger soon. that's why I have a special bottle on ice in the fridge. I'm going to drink it in my driveway, so when the cult in my neighborhood drives by they can see it..including the MF who threatened me with a pellet gun 10 years ago..because I told him who I voted for. Don't count on it. Putin doesn't seem to be very happy with his "puppet". I'm sure he'd be happy to have good ol' "Tell Vladimir I will have more flexibility after the election" to deal with.
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 20, 2019 11:51:40 GMT -8
Shouldn't get that far. The first lower court judge it comes before should ask "has Congress tried to remedy this themselves under the governing law?" If not, then get out my court. Unless the judge is a partisan hack. I'm sure the left will find one, in which case Trump should just flip him the bird, and write a letter explaining why, with a copy to the SCOTUS recommending they straighten out the rogue judge who is acting ultra vires. If a judge does not rule in favor of Trump the only possibility is that the judge is a "partisan hack". I just love the desperate propaganda tactics of the radical far right wingers. "...desperate propaganda tactics..." What in hell do you think this backwater political message board is actually capable of, anyway. You funny.
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 20, 2019 11:54:02 GMT -8
If a judge does not rule in favor of Trump the only possibility is that the judge is a "partisan hack". I just love the desperate propaganda tactics of the radical far right wingers. He can google latin phrases and has a JD from Aztecmesa, so I’d think he knows a liiiiiiittle bit more about judicial jurisprudence than a sitting judge. futue te irrumator, mentulas magnas in culo accipis.Google that, Twerp
|
|
|
Post by sandiegopete on Feb 20, 2019 15:13:51 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Feb 21, 2019 11:37:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by sandiegopete on Feb 21, 2019 14:32:03 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Mar 11, 2019 16:29:37 GMT -8
It’s funny how democrats wanted a wall just a few years ago. The only reason they don’t want one now(and not just because Trump wants it) is because they are imploding from within and losing their moderate base. They need these illegals to beef up the population and get fraudulent votes . They don’t Give a $#!+ about these people other than to keep an ignorant lower class beholding to them to stay in power. They could care less about the law and America, IMO. So I don’t care how they build the wall, just do it. To me these people are just a bunch of thieves, so kick them all out including their snotty kids which they use as pawns. If that sounds cruel....tuff. We are either a nation of laws or we are not. Illegals have no rights until they come here legally. Even Cesar Chavez hated these clowns. So get it done.......period. Typical semantical twist from the nutty right. The vote was for a fence, not a wall. Can't you make your claim without lying? www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/apr/23/mick-mulvaney/fact-check-did-top-democrats-vote-border-wall-2006/To me it’s one and the same. But I don’t give a $#!+. Just build the damn thing.
|
|