|
Post by douchey1 on Dec 18, 2014 7:12:20 GMT -8
Fisher didn't stroke out
|
|
|
Post by rebar619 on Dec 18, 2014 8:24:00 GMT -8
Come to think of it, Pope didn't play either. That's 2 games in a row on the bench for Pope. Is he ill or is it just the matchups? IIRC Fisher didnt want to rush Pope back and wanted him to just play spot time in a few games before the MWC sked.
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Dec 18, 2014 8:40:47 GMT -8
The Aztecs scored 37 in the second half shooting, 60% from the field and 75% from the free throw line with only 6 turnovers. We had a great comeback. Aztecs rebounded 40% of their missed shots. That is very good. A great comeback in the second half. You know we were only down 2 at half right? Apparently we did everything right in the second half and still lost. I'm sure the voters will recognize that. We were down 5 with 30 seconds to go in the second half and came back to force OT. That was a great comeback in the second half. Pointing to some other deficit and time frame in the second half doesn't change that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 9:05:21 GMT -8
Thought Shepard was fairly good , hit his FT's . Drove to the basket well . Zabo did not have any TO's , maybe they should play a real PG at PG . Kell is a SG . Pope did not have any TO 's , he deserves Shrigley's minutes . Time to give Zabo and Pope some extended PT . Thought when we moved the ball and guys moved our offense was decent . Can we scrap the 3 point shooting . Uh Stan, Zabo didn't play against UC. He knew that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 9:05:52 GMT -8
Thought Shepard was fairly good , hit his FT's . Drove to the basket well . Zabo did not have any TO's , maybe they should play a real PG at PG . Kell is a SG . Pope did not have any TO 's , he deserves Shrigley's minutes . Time to give Zabo and Pope some extended PT . Thought when we moved the ball and guys moved our offense was decent . Can we scrap the 3 point shooting . Come to think of it, Pope didn't play either. And that as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 9:09:46 GMT -8
Why is it that SDSU fans do not understand that if a guy is lost on defense he won't play?
Also, why do SDSU fans automatically assume that an incoming freshman is a savior?
Stop expecting this to be the Fab 5 and you'll all be a lot happier. This team will be pretty good by year end. How good? Who knows.
|
|
|
Post by therealoracle on Dec 18, 2014 9:27:01 GMT -8
Why is it that SDSU fans do not understand that if a guy is lost on defense he won't play? Also, why do SDSU fans automatically assume that an incoming freshman is a savior?Stop expecting this to be the Fab 5 and you'll all be a lot happier. This team will be pretty good by year end. How good? Who knows. If you look at the Youtube comments on Pope's mixtape ( www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZ8xXKmvsyU), he is supposed to the next Kevin Durant. I BELIEVE. The Real Oracle Out
|
|
|
Post by rebar619 on Dec 18, 2014 13:54:59 GMT -8
Come to think of it, Pope didn't play either. And that as well. Really? If that is the case then he needs to work on his communication skills.
|
|
|
Post by fatfreddy on Dec 18, 2014 14:03:29 GMT -8
Great passing down low to sky & chol for some slam dunks.......
Downside..... Bad passing down low to sky & chol for some turnovers!
|
|
|
Post by gigglyforshrigley on Dec 18, 2014 14:13:55 GMT -8
A great comeback in the second half. You know we were only down 2 at half right? Apparently we did everything right in the second half and still lost. I'm sure the voters will recognize that. We were down 5 with 30 seconds to go in the second half and came back to force OT. That was a great comeback in the second half. Pointing to some other deficit and time frame in the second half doesn't change that. Wouldn't call that a "comeback".. a comeback is longer term than 30 seconds. Seemed like a late desperation "run". LBSU was a better example of a comeback in the last 8+ minutes down 9 or whatever it was
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Dec 18, 2014 14:25:39 GMT -8
We were down 5 with 30 seconds to go in the second half and came back to force OT. That was a great comeback in the second half. Pointing to some other deficit and time frame in the second half doesn't change that. Wouldn't call that a "comeback".. a comeback is longer term than 30 seconds. Seemed like a late desperation "run". LBSU was a better example of a comeback in the last 8+ minutes down 9 or whatever it was Really? I didn't think the term was time dependant at all. Learn something new every day. In case you didn't recognize it - that was a witty comeback.
|
|
|
Post by gigglyforshrigley on Dec 18, 2014 14:39:56 GMT -8
Wouldn't call that a "comeback".. a comeback is longer term than 30 seconds. Seemed like a late desperation "run". LBSU was a better example of a comeback in the last 8+ minutes down 9 or whatever it was Really? I didn't think the term was time dependant at all. Learn something new every day. In case you didn't recognize it - that was a witty comeback. It might not be the "by the book" definition that you can find in a stat sheet somewhere, that's probably why you didn't know
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Dec 18, 2014 14:45:28 GMT -8
Really? I didn't think the term was time dependant at all. Learn something new every day. In case you didn't recognize it - that was a witty comeback. It might not be the "by the book" definition that you can find in a stat sheet somewhere, that's probably why you didn't know I was talking about English - not stats. Why don't you look up the definition and show where there is a time frame even insinuated. To be clear, it is you opposing my use of the term for a 30 second period. You are being picky and you are wrong - not a nice combination.
|
|
|
Post by gigglyforshrigley on Dec 19, 2014 6:25:43 GMT -8
It might not be the "by the book" definition that you can find in a stat sheet somewhere, that's probably why you didn't know I was talking about English - not stats. Why don't you look up the definition and show where there is a time frame even insinuated. To be clear, it is you opposing my use of the term for a 30 second period. You are being picky and you are wrong - not a nice combination. I was clearly just being facetious
|
|