|
|
Post by monkeyballs on Sept 21, 2010 19:00:43 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by joshjones1 on Sept 21, 2010 19:13:03 GMT -8
Or, it could be prudent management, given the uncertainty of what the cap may be in 2011 or 2012. Why put your team in a hole?
Why they won't re-sign McNeill is beyond me.
Deal VJ already and move on. He ain't coming back.
Moneyballs...how many chicks u got these days? Still balancing about 3 or 4, dog?
|
|
|
|
Post by jhonka34 on Sept 21, 2010 23:56:53 GMT -8
That makes sense. I mean, the top ten spenders have sent 2 super bowl winners and 4 super bowl losers in the last 10 years. (Just ignore that the bottom 10 teams also have a super bowl winner and 3 losers in that same decade: i.e. the extra $453.5 million the top ten teams spent (this year) earned 1 more win and 1 more loss.) These number clearly prove that payroll is directly related to super bowl success. Which is why I have selected the winner of the Washington-Dallas NFC champ game to win this year over the winner of the NYJ-Oakland AFC champ game.
|
|
|
|
Post by monkeyballs on Sept 22, 2010 14:23:13 GMT -8
So exactly how many SB has the Chargers won? You can count how many by just staring at the thin air.
|
|
|
|
Post by jhonka34 on Sept 22, 2010 19:08:38 GMT -8
Same as the Vikings, Eagles, Falcons, Titans, Panthers, Seahawks, Lions, Browns and Texans. All of which have a higher payroll. They do have less SB wins than the Bucs, Chiefs and Broncos. Of course, their payroll is lower than ours.
|
|
|
|
Post by 83aztec on Sept 23, 2010 14:08:26 GMT -8
Watch this year they will win it all. When people least expect it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Sept 26, 2010 13:52:06 GMT -8
4 linebackers out for various reasons, no VJ this team is spinning it's wheels.  |
|
|
|
Post by monkeyballs on Oct 17, 2010 21:47:17 GMT -8
Look like the prophet is right again.
|
|
