|
Post by iambballanalyst on Jul 26, 2012 10:25:12 GMT -8
Assuming the player is at least average in the other areas, which attribute would you consider the most important? Why?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2012 10:33:06 GMT -8
Motor/Effort/Competitiveness
It enables you to get the most out of the skills you have while also leading to improvement over time.
IMO, most fans idea of what constitutes basketball IQ is shaky at best.
|
|
|
Post by danloc09 on Jul 26, 2012 10:36:54 GMT -8
This is weird though, because rebounding kind of requires a high motor doesn't it?
|
|
|
Post by sdsustoner on Jul 26, 2012 10:38:29 GMT -8
It depends on his position. I could care less if a PG could rebound if he can't dribble.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2012 10:39:18 GMT -8
This is weird though, because rebounding kind of requires a high motor doesn't it? I guess if you separate the effort in getting rebounds from the skills involved in rebounding(timing, creating levergage, etc)
|
|
|
Post by 1611Luginbill on Jul 26, 2012 10:40:36 GMT -8
Smoking weed in a discreet manner.
|
|
|
Post by danloc09 on Jul 26, 2012 10:40:56 GMT -8
Also, give me defense over most of em aside from effort I suppose.
|
|
|
Post by iambballanalyst on Jul 26, 2012 10:47:44 GMT -8
Also, give me defense over most of em aside from effort I suppose. defense and rebounding kind of goes hand in hand with motor. Unless you have incredible length that allows you to block shots and grab rebounds others can't get to. For example, Hasheem Thabeet in College. Obviously that doesn't always transfer to the next level.
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on Jul 26, 2012 10:56:56 GMT -8
Being able to pass to yourself off the backboard and dunking trumps them all.
|
|
|
Post by iambballanalyst on Jul 26, 2012 11:04:12 GMT -8
Being able to pass to yourself off the backboard and dunking trumps them all. Well, I guess that does involve handles/passing, IQ, and motor. lol
|
|
|
Post by OfficialAztecINSIDER on Jul 26, 2012 11:13:04 GMT -8
That is a terrible poll.
|
|
|
Post by sdsustoner on Jul 26, 2012 11:16:59 GMT -8
Smoking weed in a discreet manner. I change my vote to this ^^^
|
|
|
Post by monty on Jul 26, 2012 11:24:58 GMT -8
Having an extra 'a' in your name
|
|
|
Post by danloc09 on Jul 26, 2012 11:24:58 GMT -8
Also, give me defense over most of em aside from effort I suppose. defense and rebounding kind of goes hand in hand with motor. Unless you have incredible length that allows you to block shots and grab rebounds others can't get to. For example, Hasheem Thabeet in College. Obviously that doesn't always transfer to the next level. Ya kind of, but defense itself is a unique skill. There are plenty of players with high motors that are bad defenders (Kevin Love comes to mind.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2012 11:53:12 GMT -8
You say that they are at least average in other areas so I would take effort over everything else. I think effort and competitiveness go hand in hand.
|
|
|
Post by aztecgold on Jul 28, 2012 8:12:38 GMT -8
If everything else is the same then the one that is most competitive and willing to put in the extra work to get better will be better.
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 30, 2012 13:24:04 GMT -8
You say that they are at least average in other areas so I would take effort over everything else. I think effort and competitiveness go hand in hand. It seems like a trick question. If a player has a high effort and still is only average in all other areas, than that player is a well below average player who barely gets by from having above average effort. Any other answer means the player can step up his effort in an important game and be better in all areas. But if they are at maximum effort already, you have what you have - no better than an average player. Trick question and most fell for it.
|
|
|
Post by mactec on Jul 30, 2012 16:04:35 GMT -8
To what extreme? If we have an all-around average player who can only excel in one of these I would choose shooting--at least for college ball. I mean, just look at Jimmer's success in college and what can he do besides shoot?
NBA is a different story.
|
|
|
Post by northcountymike on Jul 30, 2012 18:05:39 GMT -8
There are no trick questions here...it's just another rouse for BBA to tell us all how Jamaal is the best at everything on this list. And if he's statistically not the best, BBA will tell us how his potential and his motor are more important than stats. You can't win so don't try.
|
|
|
Post by iambballanalyst on Jul 30, 2012 18:20:25 GMT -8
There are no trick questions here...it's just another rouse for BBA to tell us all how Jamaal is the best at everything on this list. And if he's statistically not the best, BBA will tell us how his potential and his motor are more important than stats. You can't win so don't try. Why did you bring up Jamaal? Don't turn this into a Jamaal thread please. Thank you.
|
|