|
Post by AztecWilliam on Aug 14, 2010 10:35:33 GMT -8
There has for some time been a growing sense that Barack Obama and his administration have basically thrown in the towel on any possibility of preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons. Not to worry (well, not to worry too much) say some observers. Containment will keep the mullahs in line. But is that the only possibility? And, furthermore, what are the dangers inherent in a policy of containment? Bret Stephens takes a long and detailed look at the ramifications of a policy of containment aimed at a nuclear armed Iran. www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/iran-cannot-be-contained-15462?page=allAzWm
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Aug 31, 2010 6:48:16 GMT -8
Containment will not work with Radical Islam. their religion teaches that it is their duty to kill infidels.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 31, 2010 11:36:11 GMT -8
We can try containment I guess. Do not think that it will work. We have let ourselves get in a real hard spot.
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Aug 31, 2010 19:29:17 GMT -8
Iranian money is behind almost all terror attacks in the western world. They have been doing it ever since Radical Islam took over in 1979. Bombs here. Bombs there. Bombs almost everywhere. The Russians are kissing unwashed Iranian Arse and are doing it with glee over the fact that they think Iran will stop funding the Chechnya Rebels. The Iranians have told the Chechnyans to stop lighting forest fires all over Russia and apparently they have complied. So now the Russians are Giddy that they have a Radical Islamic ally. Iran will be their bosom buddy as long as Russia provides the nuclear reactor.
|
|