|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 9, 2010 16:13:16 GMT -8
Why would I feel obligated to defend an idea or post that is true on its face? Your post that Deddeh is corrupt is true on its face? Is that what you are saying? I never said that!
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 10, 2010 12:07:43 GMT -8
Wadie P. Deddeh is a public figure. A very old public figure, but that is neither here nor there. Anyway, as such, he is fair game. As Win indicated, his (Win's) statement was a mere speculation, not a direct accusation. Notice that Win did not say that one of his fellow AztecMesans was full of excrement. That sort of thing displeases me, but not so much that I would use my lofty ( ) position to cast out anyone guilty of using such inelegant language. Reminder: posters should state their cases forcefully but without rancor or personal attacks aimed as other posters. WLR William, I would like some clarity here. You took the trouble to publically post how displeased you were that I had said win was full of "excrement"(your word), yet a conservative can call a moderate "f****** pathetic" and I have not seen a peep from you about that. Did I miss it? Or should I assume that conservatives can post with all the "rancor and personal attacks" they want?
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 10, 2010 12:36:59 GMT -8
Wadie P. Deddeh is a public figure. A very old public figure, but that is neither here nor there. Anyway, as such, he is fair game. As Win indicated, his (Win's) statement was a mere speculation, not a direct accusation. Notice that Win did not say that one of his fellow AztecMesans was full of excrement. That sort of thing displeases me, but not so much that I would use my lofty ( ) position to cast out anyone guilty of using such inelegant language. Reminder: posters should state their cases forcefully but without rancor or personal attacks aimed as other posters. WLR William, I would like some clarity here. You took the trouble to publically post how displeased you were that I had said win was full of "excrement"(your word), yet a conservative can call a moderate "f****** pathetic" and I have not seen a peep from you about that. Did I miss it? Or should I assume that conservatives can post with all the "rancor and personal attacks" they want? If it was on this thread, it looks like William took care of it.
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 10, 2010 12:45:11 GMT -8
William, I would like some clarity here. You took the trouble to publically post how displeased you were that I had said win was full of "excrement"(your word), yet a conservative can call a moderate "f****** pathetic" and I have not seen a peep from you about that. Did I miss it? Or should I assume that conservatives can post with all the "rancor and personal attacks" they want? If it was on this thread, it looks like William took care of it. Stoneface thread, page three, politics.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 11, 2010 12:40:57 GMT -8
If it was on this thread, it looks like William took care of it. Stoneface thread, page three, politics. I see it. Just because this fellow agrees with me or I with him most of the time does not mean I condone the language. At the same time, I usually just ridicule the poster if I feel strongly enough about it. I will never complain to William about any poster. This is his board and I welcome everyone to participate even those who use profane language. I think we should all use that approach if we feel that way. Go after the poster and don't bother William with it.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Aug 11, 2010 16:35:48 GMT -8
Stoneface thread, page three, politics. I see it. Just because this fellow agrees with me or I with him most of the time does not mean I condone the language. Despite the fact that you have a rather good time whacking people, justified or not, for the use of profanity. Sorry, but I've seen this act of yours before. =Bob
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 11, 2010 16:39:11 GMT -8
I see it. Just because this fellow agrees with me or I with him most of the time does not mean I condone the language. Despite the fact that you have a rather good time whacking people, justified or not, for the use of profanity. Sorry, but I've seen this act of yours before. =Bob So?
|
|