|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on Aug 1, 2010 10:37:22 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Aug 2, 2010 8:01:53 GMT -8
Not to worry. Socialist and Islamic states can walk hand in hand into a Bright Future of Change.
Once we lay down our arms and cease making war on peaceful people, the world will become a beautiful place.
|
|
|
|
Post by monty on Aug 11, 2010 22:17:41 GMT -8
Just a throwaway question, why do conservatives seem to abbreviate to POTUS and SCOTUS, why not just president and supreme court
|
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Aug 12, 2010 7:24:31 GMT -8
Just a throwaway question, why do conservatives seem to abbreviate to POTUS and SCOTUS, why not just president and supreme court Not just conservatives. |
|
|
|
Post by joshjones1 on Aug 12, 2010 16:20:57 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Aug 14, 2010 6:50:11 GMT -8
The Christian Science Monitor used to be a darn good newspaper when it was printed. The Paper is gone now, and the On Line edition leaves lots to be desired. The article, a "reprint" is just so much speculation that is not backed up with fact. You might call it Speculation for Speculation's Sake. Knowing Benjamin Netanyahu as I do, I can absolutely guarantee you that Israel will strike Iran. They have no choice. The attack is an absolute certainty and will come well before next summer. |
|
|
|
Post by monty on Aug 15, 2010 12:22:38 GMT -8
Just a throwaway question, why do conservatives seem to abbreviate to POTUS and SCOTUS, why not just president and supreme court Not just conservatives. of course not, but it seems like more of them do, I was wondering if some conservative or otherwise source often does this acronym (which i don't like, just seems so MiniTru a la 1984 to me). |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Aug 15, 2010 14:41:48 GMT -8
of course not, but it seems like more of them do, I was wondering if some conservative or otherwise source often does this acronym (which i don't like, just seems so MiniTru a la 1984 to me). I think the Secret Service uses these acronyms, but I don't know the origination. Also, there is VPOTUS for the Vice President and there is FLOTUS for the First Lady. I would suggest a collective term for all of these fecal gas-bags: "FLATUS" |
|
|
|
Post by monty on Aug 15, 2010 19:01:59 GMT -8
of course not, but it seems like more of them do, I was wondering if some conservative or otherwise source often does this acronym (which i don't like, just seems so MiniTru a la 1984 to me). I think the Secret Service uses these acronyms, but I don't know the origination. Also, there is VPOTUS for the Vice President and there is FLOTUS for the First Lady. I would suggest a collective term for all of these fecal gas-bags: "FLATUS" or Plautus, he always had lots of fart jokes |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 16, 2010 11:56:43 GMT -8
Debka or Drudge suggests that it will be soon. If they wait till after fuel rods are inserted you need to worry about spreading radio active debris.
|
|
|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on Aug 22, 2010 9:56:59 GMT -8
Debka or Drudge suggests that it will be soon. If they wait till after fuel rods are inserted you need to worry about spreading radio active debris. Too late! The rods are in! Apparently, it is more important to Russia to poke a thumb in our eye than to prevent a nuclear armed extremist regime virtually on their southern border. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face! AzWm |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Aug 22, 2010 19:55:22 GMT -8
Debka or Drudge suggests that it will be soon. If they wait till after fuel rods are inserted you need to worry about spreading radio active debris. Too late! The rods are in! Apparently, it is more important to Russia to poke a thumb in our eye than to prevent a nuclear armed extremist regime virtually on their southern border. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face! AzWm There is no problem with bombing the Reactor. Minor site contamination will ensue, but not as much as in the area where they processed the fuel for the fuel rods. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on Aug 22, 2010 21:42:02 GMT -8
Too late! The rods are in! Apparently, it is more important to Russia to poke a thumb in our eye than to prevent a nuclear armed extremist regime virtually on their southern border. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face! AzWm There is no problem with bombing the Reactor. Minor site contamination will ensue, but not as much as in the area where they processed the fuel for the fuel rods. Well, in that case I suppose that the world will just ignore such an Israeli air raid.  AzWm |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Aug 23, 2010 6:16:43 GMT -8
There is no problem with bombing the Reactor. Minor site contamination will ensue, but not as much as in the area where they processed the fuel for the fuel rods. Well, in that case I suppose that the world will just ignore such an Israeli air raid. AzWm We can not allow a Radical Islamic country like Iran to possess nuclear weapons. We need to take out that capacity now. Most of the people on this board are not aware of the fact that Iran is funding most of the Islamic terrorism around the world. I have posted links to their hundreds of hideous bloody atrocities in the past. There is absolutely nothing to persuade me that we should not nuke the $#!+ out of all of their facilities. With this post, I guess I have returned to the old ultra Conservative Joe who is so far right that I'd make Barry Goldwater look like a liberal. |
|
|
|
Post by aztectom***** on Aug 27, 2010 14:32:53 GMT -8
0% chance
|
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Aug 28, 2010 7:15:28 GMT -8
Absolutely guaranteed that the nuclear weapon making capacity of Iran will be seriously damaged or destroyed. |
|
