|
Post by SDSU-Alum2003 on Sept 27, 2011 15:36:46 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by azteken on Sept 27, 2011 16:06:19 GMT -8
Only if they drop the minimum of the 6 AQs from 1 to 0. The third place team in the SEC will be way better than the BE champ. With Syracuse and Pitt leaving, and maybe UConn, the BE has to lose their AQ status.
|
|
|
Post by aztecfankrishnan on Sept 27, 2011 16:07:13 GMT -8
They are going to have to add another BCS game.
|
|
|
Post by azteken on Sept 27, 2011 16:16:26 GMT -8
Here's the final regular-season BCS standings for 2010: 1. Auburn 2. Oregon 3. TCU 4. Stanford 5. Wisconsin 6. Ohio State 7. Oklahoma 8. Arkansas 9. Michigan State 10. LSU
SEC: 3 Big 10: 3 Pac-10: 2 MWC: 1 Big 12: 1 ACC: 0 Big East: 0 WAC: 0 (Boise St was 11) C-USA, MAC, Sunbelt, Independents: 0
I wouldn't really have a problem with 3 teams from a league if they're all in the top 10. What I object to is #13 VA Tech (no team with a FCS loss should be in a BCS game) and outside the top 25 UConn getting big paydays just because they're in AQ conferences. West Virginia was #22, but didn't get the BE AQ slot.
|
|
|
Post by firemedic619 on Sept 27, 2011 16:23:42 GMT -8
It still doesn't change the fact that the only way a MWC team can play in a BCS bowl game is by going undefeated. Now, if them increasing the teams keeps an undefeated MWC team out, then we have a HUGE problem.
|
|
|
Post by sdsuaztecs on Sept 27, 2011 16:44:46 GMT -8
The SEC is doing us and the MW a favor. They are forcing the issue. The SEC wants a playoff......the Big 10 does not. Who's running the show?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2011 17:06:49 GMT -8
The big boys aren't making enough coin. Only something like $22 million per year in football revenue now for Texas. That's not enough since they haven't caught God yet.
|
|
|
Post by reb77 on Sept 28, 2011 6:07:24 GMT -8
|
|