|
|
Post by southocaztec on Sept 22, 2011 12:41:40 GMT -8
We have some serious depth ar rb. If he declares that means we did something great in football similar to Aztecs bball and kawhi. This is what happends with good teams! Aztectone is spot on. The good and the bad of having teams that are playing for championships is you have exceptional players on the team that will have opportunities to play professional sooner than later. We should have quality people behind them ready to step in. |
|
|
|
Post by bill456 on Sept 22, 2011 12:50:29 GMT -8
I agree with K-man. We don't need Canepa sticking his nose into an impressionable 20 year olds head on big game week. This is a post season article at best! The timing stinks. They have played NO conference games yet, and if, GOD FORBID, something happens, him bringing this up would have been a waste of time. Let the fans, the team, and especially Ronnie focus on the what's ahead, MWC play, before we envision #13 holding up a NFL jersey at the Draft. So we just skipped from Heisman talk to NFL... nice  |
|
|
|
Post by jcljorgenson on Sept 22, 2011 12:52:24 GMT -8
I actually found this to be an interesting piece of news. You guys need to take a chill pill with Canepa, he didn't do anything wrong or change the reality of the situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by longtimebooster on Sept 22, 2011 12:56:54 GMT -8
I don't know what the big ruckus is. There were a number of psotters on this board who were speculating about Hillman only being here for 2 years as early as the middle of last year. It's not like Canepa is saying anything new. He's just saying it in print.
|
|
|
|
Post by MinnesotaAztec on Sept 22, 2011 13:26:36 GMT -8
I agree with K-man. We don't need Canepa sticking his nose into an impressionable 20 year olds head on big game week. This is a post season article at best! I totally agree ! When the entire Aztec team needs 110% focus on THE FRICKEN GAME, Canepa announces to the Aztecs, and all of San Diego, that he knows "inside scoop" on Hillman ! Unbelievable !  |
|
|
|
Post by podpeople on Sept 22, 2011 13:40:14 GMT -8
Was it not Canepa who wrote an article on how SDSU should shut down its football program a few years back? please correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember reading something along those lines. Wasn't Canepa. Was Mark Ziegler, I believe. Canepa is an SDSU alum and a huge Aztec fball honk. yeah, for some reason my memory wants to blame it on Canepa. hah! |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Sept 22, 2011 16:40:20 GMT -8
I agree with K-man. We don't need Canepa sticking his nose into an impressionable 20 year olds head on big game week. This is a post season article at best! What, you think Ronnie isn't thinking about this? How naive are you? =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by justanothersdsufan on Sept 22, 2011 17:02:57 GMT -8
I think it depends on where he's projected to be drafted and all...
|
|
|
|
Post by bearfoot on Sept 22, 2011 21:58:38 GMT -8
Was it not Canepa who wrote an article on how SDSU should shut down its football program a few years back? please correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember reading something along those lines. It was not Nick, but Mark Ziegler. |
|
|
|
Post by bearfoot on Sept 22, 2011 22:04:24 GMT -8
I agree with K-man. We don't need Canepa sticking his nose into an impressionable 20 year olds head on big game week. This is a post season article at best! I totally agree ! When the entire Aztec team needs 110% focus on THE FRICKEN GAME, Canepa announces to the Aztecs, and all of San Diego, that he knows "inside scoop" on Hillman ! Unbelievable ! So, you think the football team has nothing better to do that read the U-T when they are all packing to leave for Michigan? They all left this afternoon. BTW, it is impossible to focus, play, study whatever at %110. Max possible is 100%. |
|
|
|
Post by FULL_MONTY on Sept 22, 2011 22:11:33 GMT -8
Ronnie needs another year in the weight room.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecfan1 on Sept 23, 2011 1:55:05 GMT -8
I think he un-necessarily made Rocky look a little foolish. Could have asked him without pointing out he didn't not know the specifics of the rule.
|
|
