|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Apr 1, 2011 7:24:20 GMT -8
They are encouraging abortions. Thank heavens somebody has enough common sense to realize how important that is to the world. Of course we need to set up Planned Parenthood in all the countries of the world.
By use of contraception and abortion when contraception has failed, Planned Parenthood is saving millions from death by starvation.
I have never been able to figure out how the so called Religious People of the world can attack birth control when they know the alternative is horribly ugly and painful death. There is nothing religious about starvation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Montezuma on Apr 1, 2011 7:47:30 GMT -8
This an April Fools joke.....right?
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Apr 2, 2011 6:36:31 GMT -8
We all have the right to support any cause we want. Just not with tax dollars.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Apr 5, 2011 11:06:17 GMT -8
We all have the right to support any cause we want. Just not with tax dollars. And why not with Tax Dollars? Causes are issues that need to be corrected. We once declared a Great War on Poverty. We tried and failed. It was a neat cause, but it did not deal with the actual issue. There simply are too many stupid people being born who can not hold on to a job or can not find work when there are only so many manual labor jobs.. Red China has a Billion peasants. They have thought of tremendous public works projects for them to make work for the low IQ member of their society. They also have unleashed biological weapons on their own people to keep their numbers down. They have also imposed "One Child per Family" limits on babies to try to put a cap on their problem. India has resorted to not providing immunizations against common diseases (Like Japanese Encephalitis) among the poor rural populations. I started a campaign against their obvious program of neglect, and pressured them to start a token immunization program in the Uttar Pradesh region of northern central India (while neglecting the other provinces.. I was rather proud of that, but realized that all I had foolishly done was provide for the birth of millions of more low IQ people. The Indian Policy is best. Just let them die of "natural causes" (Like Japanese Encephalitis) because otherwise they die of starvation or malnutrition. India actually considered sterilizing the lower IQ people about 12 years ago and decided that sounded too much like Eugenics and they realized they could not do that. Eugenics got a bad name because of the antics of the Nazis in Germany. We use eugenics to breed superior animals on the farm or superior dogs for dog shows, but we refuse to even flirt with the idea when it comes to humans. The closest we come is to encourage people who really do not want more children to practice birth control and for those ladies who have become pregnant the reality of the medical procedure to terminate an unwanted pregnancy is explained. I dare anybody who is supposedly opposed to abortion to tell me why they effectively endorse the mass misery on this planet caused by out of control increases in the human animal population and the subsequent die of of hundreds of millions of species because of mankind's disgusting rape of the Earth. We need to get the global population under five hundred million. The sooner we do that the better. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Apr 5, 2011 12:57:24 GMT -8
I get your point. Abortion would limit population and weed out what you consider undesirables because some of our folks most likely to be aborted are from minority and undereducated redneck segments of our population. That is not what we are about as a nation.
We need to get control of population, but murder of unborn humans is not the answer and certainly not with tax money.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Apr 5, 2011 13:06:03 GMT -8
I get your point. Abortion would limit population and weed out what you consider undesirables because some of our folks most likely to be aborted are from minority and undereducated redneck segments of our population. That is not what we are about as a nation. We need to get control of population, but murder of unborn humans is not the answer and certainly not with tax money. Nobody is doing any murdering. It is just the removal of useless tissue growing inside of somebody who does not want it there. It is their right to remove that tissue, and they should not be restricted in that right because they do not have the means to pay for the medical procedure. It has absolutely nothing to do with religion or religious preference. Those people who have some religious hangups should practice their religion and not try to force their foolish biased viewpoints upon others. Next, the religious fanatics will be voting for Sharia Law for all. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Apr 5, 2011 13:18:16 GMT -8
I get your point. Abortion would limit population and weed out what you consider undesirables because some of our folks most likely to be aborted are from minority and undereducated redneck segments of our population. That is not what we are about as a nation. We need to get control of population, but murder of unborn humans is not the answer and certainly not with tax money. Nobody is doing any murdering. It is just the removal of useless tissue growing inside of somebody who does not want it there. It is their right to remove that tissue, and they should not be restricted in that right because they do not have the means to pay for the medical procedure. It has absolutely nothing to do with religion or religious preference. Those people who have some religious hangups should practice their religion and not try to force their foolish biased viewpoints upon others. Next, the religious fanatics will be voting for Sharia Law for all. Does that mean you are for the defacto attack on the lives of minorities? |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Apr 5, 2011 18:43:51 GMT -8
Nobody is doing any murdering. It is just the removal of useless tissue growing inside of somebody who does not want it there. It is their right to remove that tissue, and they should not be restricted in that right because they do not have the means to pay for the medical procedure. It has absolutely nothing to do with religion or religious preference. Those people who have some religious hangups should practice their religion and not try to force their foolish biased viewpoints upon others. Next, the religious fanatics will be voting for Sharia Law for all. Does that mean you are for the defacto attack on the lives of minorities? What minorities? Remember to be a person one has to be born. Without a birth certificate you can not even become president and that is considered to be an inferior job. If you want me to stop being a Liberal, please let me know. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Apr 6, 2011 13:31:19 GMT -8
Does that mean you are for the defacto attack on the lives of minorities? What minorities? Remember to be a person one has to be born. Without a birth certificate you can not even become president and that is considered to be an inferior job. If you want me to stop being a Liberal, please let me know. Keep on being a liberal, Joe. At least you make some sense once in a while. The rest of the liberals are near brain dead.  Don't try to side step the obvious question about much larger numbers of minorities being killed by abortion. I want you to defend this support you have for a racist policy. |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Apr 6, 2011 17:30:22 GMT -8
What minorities? Remember to be a person one has to be born. Without a birth certificate you can not even become president and that is considered to be an inferior job. If you want me to stop being a Liberal, please let me know. Keep on being a liberal, Joe. At least you make some sense once in a while. The rest of the liberals are near brain dead. Don't try to side step the obvious question about much larger numbers of minorities being killed by abortion. I want you to defend this support you have for a racist policy. You have got to tell the women who are choosing to get the abortions that they are racist. The way to eliminate poverty in this country (Remember the Great War on Poverty?) is to encourage the lower IQ people not to have six and seven babies per woman. The War on Poverty provided for single women who were having babies sans husband. The more babies they had, the more money they got to pump out stupid kids. We had a tremendous increase in the birth of LOW IQ kids and in those cities that had strong welfare programs they noted that the average IQ of the students in the school system went down about five points every ten years. Amazing how that works. You pay stupid women to have many stupid babies and then your schools are listed as failures because they can not make stupid kids learn as if they were normal. It was the damn Republican Conservatives that gave us that program and those results. |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Apr 6, 2011 17:34:15 GMT -8
Moral to the story is that if men have a tested IQ below 90 they should be denutted as defective and not allowed to breed.
|
|
|
|
Post by markyc on Apr 6, 2011 20:17:21 GMT -8
Moral to the story is that if men have a tested IQ below 90 they should be denutted as defective and not allowed to breed. While I do agree that we need less "dumb" people in the U.S., your idea is straight out of Germany 1940's. The problem is that the uneducated either cannot afford, or dont care about forms of contraception. If we did enact your idea what would happen to the south? Population would dwindle |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Apr 7, 2011 11:47:48 GMT -8
Keep on being a liberal, Joe. At least you make some sense once in a while. The rest of the liberals are near brain dead. Don't try to side step the obvious question about much larger numbers of minorities being killed by abortion. I want you to defend this support you have for a racist policy. You have got to tell the women who are choosing to get the abortions that they are racist. The way to eliminate poverty in this country (Remember the Great War on Poverty?) is to encourage the lower IQ people not to have six and seven babies per woman. The War on Poverty provided for single women who were having babies sans husband. The more babies they had, the more money they got to pump out stupid kids. We had a tremendous increase in the birth of LOW IQ kids and in those cities that had strong welfare programs they noted that the average IQ of the students in the school system went down about five points every ten years. Amazing how that works. You pay stupid women to have many stupid babies and then your schools are listed as failures because they can not make stupid kids learn as if they were normal. It was the damn Republican Conservatives that gave us that program and those results. That does not sound like an answer to me. You are saying that minorities are not only having this huge number of children on top of the widespread use of abortion on demand. That still sounds like a racist view to me. Where am I wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Apr 8, 2011 16:26:49 GMT -8
You have got to tell the women who are choosing to get the abortions that they are racist. The way to eliminate poverty in this country (Remember the Great War on Poverty?) is to encourage the lower IQ people not to have six and seven babies per woman. The War on Poverty provided for single women who were having babies sans husband. The more babies they had, the more money they got to pump out stupid kids. We had a tremendous increase in the birth of LOW IQ kids and in those cities that had strong welfare programs they noted that the average IQ of the students in the school system went down about five points every ten years. Amazing how that works. You pay stupid women to have many stupid babies and then your schools are listed as failures because they can not make stupid kids learn as if they were normal. It was the damn Republican Conservatives that gave us that program and those results. That does not sound like an answer to me. You are saying that minorities are not only having this huge number of children on top of the widespread use of abortion on demand. That still sounds like a racist view to me. Where am I wrong? Low IQ people are a minority, that is true. Soon with their fantastic subsidized birth rate they will be in the majority. There is no way that trying to get low IQ people to decrease their birth rate is racist. People who say things like that simply do not understand that stupidity knows no racial boundaries. Quite frankly there are stupid people all over the world. We have just managed to amass a great many of them in the United States. On top of that we pay them to breed stupid kids by the dozen. Win, you are not one of those guys who goes around pointing out that the average IQ in darkest Africa is retarded or damn well near it, are you? I have run across them before and they can not prove their statement other than referring to something somebody posted on the Wiki. These are the same people that will tell you that the average IQ in Italy is ten points higher in the north than it is in the south of that long country. Again, all they can do is point to a Wiki article about the IQ of nations. They need to get the actual statistics from Stanford University if they want to make a point. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Apr 8, 2011 17:06:19 GMT -8
That does not sound like an answer to me. You are saying that minorities are not only having this huge number of children on top of the widespread use of abortion on demand. That still sounds like a racist view to me. Where am I wrong? Low IQ people are a minority, that is true. Soon with their fantastic subsidized birth rate they will be in the majority. There is no way that trying to get low IQ people to decrease their birth rate is racist. People who say things like that simply do not understand that stupidity knows no racial boundaries. Quite frankly there are stupid people all over the world. We have just managed to amass a great many of them in the United States. On top of that we pay them to breed stupid kids by the dozen. Win, you are not one of those guys who goes around pointing out that the average IQ in darkest Africa is retarded or damn well near it, are you? I have run across them before and they can not prove their statement other than referring to something somebody posted on the Wiki. These are the same people that will tell you that the average IQ in Italy is ten points higher in the north than it is in the south of that long country. Again, all they can do is point to a Wiki article about the IQ of nations. They need to get the actual statistics from Stanford University if they want to make a point. Nice wiggle! What do you think about a requirement that you have at least twenty teeth with no gaps in the front in order to breed? |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Apr 8, 2011 18:58:57 GMT -8
Low IQ people are a minority, that is true. Soon with their fantastic subsidized birth rate they will be in the majority. There is no way that trying to get low IQ people to decrease their birth rate is racist. People who say things like that simply do not understand that stupidity knows no racial boundaries. Quite frankly there are stupid people all over the world. We have just managed to amass a great many of them in the United States. On top of that we pay them to breed stupid kids by the dozen. Win, you are not one of those guys who goes around pointing out that the average IQ in darkest Africa is retarded or damn well near it, are you? I have run across them before and they can not prove their statement other than referring to something somebody posted on the Wiki. These are the same people that will tell you that the average IQ in Italy is ten points higher in the north than it is in the south of that long country. Again, all they can do is point to a Wiki article about the IQ of nations. They need to get the actual statistics from Stanford University if they want to make a point. Nice wiggle! What do you think about a requirement that you have at least twenty teeth with no gaps in the front in order to breed? Wiggle? I can wiggle. Well, at least I could when I was a half century younger. I won the Twist competition in 7th grade with a Mexican girl as my partner. Boy was that a scandal back in 1961! The funny thing is she wanted to win and she knew I could "wiggle" so she was my partner for that competition. After the competition she would not dance with me because all of the Mexican guys at the school told her that it was forbidden. I was on a roll that week, as I also won the first ever Creative Writing Contest at my school. Imagine that, a 7th grader beating out the 8th graders! I won the contest with a poem that I composed in Math class just before English class. During the week we had been given four English class periods to write our "works of creative art" for the contest. As was my nature, I was goofing off with one of the pretty girls in class and had not written anything. Our teacher wanted us to submit our rough drafts when we came into class (I.e., We were supposed to finish them up as our homework for the previous evening.) I never did homework, so I had absolutely nothing to turn in when I was sitting in Math Class contemplating whether or not I might be expelled. We had been given a page of problems to do for the second half of that class, and that was when I wrote the poem. I showed it to the teacher and she thought it was something special and had me write it over with good penmanship for submission, so I actually did. Instead of being expelled, I was on radio, reading my poem and answering questions about my poetry style. Oh, on people with gaps in front of their teeth, I have known about ten in my life. Seven of the ten were extremely artistically talented and quite intelligent, so your suggestion should be reconsidered. |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Apr 8, 2011 19:16:46 GMT -8
Win, I only have 23 teeth in my head. I had all four of my Wisdom Teeth pulled. That was a bloody experience that I do not wish on anybody. They had to use a chisel and break them into segments, each with a root attached. My jaw was so swollen up by the time they were done, it looked to everybody that it must have been broken. Stitches everywhere, massive swelling and lots of pain, but I got over it and still had 24 teeth to last for the rest of my life. In 1972 I was in a fantastic bar room fight in Barcelona and I was trying to bite the fingers off of some Mediterranean creep who had started a fight with a friend of mine. (Rule number two of bar room fights is always come to the aid of your friends.) Two bouncers were holding on to my arms, but the trouble maker tried to gouge my eyes out, so I took advantage of the opportunity to amputate a couple of his fingers with my teeth as all of us were being pushed out the front door. That son of a bitch had a gold ring on his finger and I crushed it with my teeth so that it was never going to come off of his finger without a hacksaw. Unfortunately, I shattered one of my molars in the valiant effort to uphold the honor of all drunken American sailors in foreign ports..
|
|
