|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jun 22, 2010 14:51:24 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Jun 23, 2010 8:38:28 GMT -8
Turns out that the judge has a significant personal investment in oil stocks. Sounds like he should have recused himself. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jun 23, 2010 12:37:31 GMT -8
Turns out that the judge has a significant personal investment in oil stocks. Sounds like he should have recused himself. There is almost no one of any substance that does not have a stake in Oil Stocks one way on another. That is almost as silly trying to find a suitable jury for the OJ trail. |
|
|
|
Post by monty on Jun 23, 2010 17:25:56 GMT -8
Turns out that the judge has a significant personal investment in oil stocks. Sounds like he should have recused himself. There is almost no one of any substance that does not have a stake in Oil Stocks one way on another. That is almost as silly trying to find a suitable jury for the OJ trail. That is bull$#!+ - if you have a stake in your decision you should recuse yourself - If it is impossible to find someone that can't, then let's look at it again and evaluate the decision. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jun 24, 2010 12:27:34 GMT -8
There is almost no one of any substance that does not have a stake in Oil Stocks one way on another. That is almost as silly trying to find a suitable jury for the OJ trail. That is bull$#!+ - if you have a stake in your decision you should recuse yourself - If it is impossible to find someone that can't, then let's look at it again and evaluate the decision. First, you do not cite anything to show the Judge had any significant stake in oil. Further, my previous statement stands. Now we are hearing that all of these oil companies were offering their contingency plans based on Federal Government data on the possible oil spills and what would be needed to mitigate those spills. I suggest that MMA get off it's butt and provide good data rather than have a drilling ban based on governments own incompetence. |
|
