|
|
Post by Gundo on Oct 1, 2024 23:04:18 GMT -8
College Sports Tomorrow, which is a group of executives and administrators, has proposed streamlining college football into a “Super League” called the College Student Football League (CSFL). See for yourself, here's the link. fbschedules.com/proposed-college-football-super-league-details-unveiled/Say what you will, its a reshuffle of the old P5 and if any of the current P4s have a say, they will say no. The group of 5 become the G8 and SDSU is back in the MWC, or as they call it the West. The two G5s added were Navy and Memphis, to the P5s. |
|
|
|
Post by FULL_MONTY on Oct 2, 2024 5:44:01 GMT -8
It's a terrible idea. Frankly, it's unamerican.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boise Aztec on Oct 2, 2024 6:08:39 GMT -8
It's a terrible idea. Frankly, it's unamerican. It’s garbage |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 2, 2024 7:34:58 GMT -8
It's a fantasy of fans of P5 schools. An incredibly bad idea that will never happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecx on Oct 2, 2024 8:57:50 GMT -8
College Sports Tomorrow, which is a group of executives and administrators, has proposed streamlining college football into a “Super League” called the College Student Football League (CSFL). See for yourself, here's the link. fbschedules.com/proposed-college-football-super-league-details-unveiled/Say what you will, its a reshuffle of the old P5 and if any of the current P4s have a say, they will say no. The group of 5 become the G8 and SDSU is back in the MWC, or as they call it the West. The two G5s added were Navy and Memphis, to the P5s. How is this really any different that what we have now? Why would the top 20-30 schools want to split the money 72 ways, when they could split it 32 ways? |
|
|
|
Post by soccer94 on Oct 2, 2024 9:10:49 GMT -8
Not interested. The G5 should only even consider this if there is annual promotion and relegation.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecx on Oct 2, 2024 9:22:45 GMT -8
Not interested. The G5 should only even consider this if there is annual promotion and relegation. Does the G5 have any say at all? |
|
|
|
Post by soccer94 on Oct 2, 2024 9:46:56 GMT -8
Not interested. The G5 should only even consider this if there is annual promotion and relegation. Does the G5 have any say at all? They could complicate things with lawsuits. |
|
|
|
Post by Cwag on Oct 2, 2024 9:51:30 GMT -8
I guess Tulane will be giving up Football as they are not on the list.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecx on Oct 2, 2024 9:59:05 GMT -8
Does the G5 have any say at all? They could complicate things with lawsuits. I see your point. This is why I think the top 20-30 schools just form their own P1 league and organize it like the NFL. There would be boatloads of money and less schools with whom to split it. |
|
|
|
Post by Sdsu4life on Oct 2, 2024 10:06:44 GMT -8
They could complicate things with lawsuits. I see your point. This is why I think the top 20-30 schools just form their won P1 league and organize it like the NFL. There would be boatloads of money and less schools with whom to split it. I would think it would need to be more than 20-30 teams for the NFL format. I think the NFL would also want it larger so that there is a larger pool of players to draft from. 20-30 teams would only put like 100-150 guys in the draft. That's going to be 100+ too short under the current 7 rounds. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecx on Oct 2, 2024 10:30:49 GMT -8
I see your point. This is why I think the top 20-30 schools just form their won P1 league and organize it like the NFL. There would be boatloads of money and less schools with whom to split it. I would think it would need to be more than 20-30 teams for the NFL format. I think the NFL would also want it larger so that there is a larger pool of players to draft from. 20-30 teams would only put like 100-150 guys in the draft. That's going to be 100+ too short under the current 7 rounds. Players from the non P1 could still be drafted. The P1 would just control the lions share of the money. With 32 teams (same as the NFL) every game is huge. Networks would love it. Plenty of big games to go around. There is a ton of money to be split by less members. Only about half the teams would make the playoffs, but these are the only playoffs that matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Den60 on Oct 2, 2024 10:50:18 GMT -8
College Sports Tomorrow, which is a group of executives and administrators, has proposed streamlining college football into a “Super League” called the College Student Football League (CSFL). See for yourself, here's the link. fbschedules.com/proposed-college-football-super-league-details-unveiled/Say what you will, its a reshuffle of the old P5 and if any of the current P4s have a say, they will say no. The group of 5 become the G8 and SDSU is back in the MWC, or as they call it the West. The two G5s added were Navy and Memphis, to the P5s. It will likely be no more than 32 schools. If expanded, SDSU would get in before Ore. St and Wazzu, especially the latter. |
|
|
|
Post by Den60 on Oct 2, 2024 10:53:21 GMT -8
Not interested. The G5 should only even consider this if there is annual promotion and relegation. EGG-zactly! Remember, the true power schools like tOSU, Mich, PSU, USC, Alabama, Georgia, Florida look down on most teams in their own conference nowadays. No different that what happened to the PAC and now the MWC. They are looking to leave their deadweight behind and their media partners are with them 100% which is why I think the breakoff will occur around 2030. |
|
|
|
Post by Den60 on Oct 2, 2024 10:55:10 GMT -8
I would think it would need to be more than 20-30 teams for the NFL format. I think the NFL would also want it larger so that there is a larger pool of players to draft from. 20-30 teams would only put like 100-150 guys in the draft. That's going to be 100+ too short under the current 7 rounds. Players from the non P1 could still be drafted. The P1 would just control the lions share of the money. With 32 teams (same as the NFL) every game is huge. Networks would love it. Plenty of big games to go around. There is a ton of money to be split by less members. Only about half the teams would make the playoffs, but these are the only playoffs that matter. I can see the P2 signing players from the relegated schools even during the year. Hell, they are almost doing that now. |
|
|
|
Post by Gundo on Oct 2, 2024 16:08:11 GMT -8
This isn’t the Super League that the B1G and SEC are rumored to be discussing at their upcoming meeting on October 10th in Nashville. That meeting, which will include the B1G / SEC Advisory Board, is set to address the significant challenges currently facing college sports. These challenges—ranging from recent court rulings and ongoing litigation to inconsistent state laws and complex governance proposals—are prompting both conferences to take on a leadership role in shaping the future of college athletics. Notably, they did not invite the NCAA, the ACC, Big XII, PAC-12, or any Group of Five representatives to the discussion. As a result, the College Football Playoff (CFP) has essentially allowed these two conferences to manipulate the system and make decisions affecting every Division I football league and team in the country.
As a result, the College Football Playoff (CFP) and NCAA has basically ceded control, allowing the B1G and SEC to manipulate the system dictating decisions impacting every Division I football league and team in the nation—all while serving their own interests. The NCAA holds no real governance over these conferences; there is no College Football Commissioner/Czar to hold them accountable, and no entity willing to step up and call out these power moves as fundamentally wrong.
Even Jon Wilner and John Canzano suggested that the U.S. Senate should intervene, proposing legislation to regulate the college football landscape. This would encompass Playoffs, NIL , and, to ensure fair competition across all FBS schools and conferences. Yep, fair competition for all NCAA schools, players and fans, versus having the BIG & SEC Super League. This meeting takes place on October 10th.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boise Aztec on Oct 2, 2024 17:28:42 GMT -8
I guess Tulane will be giving up Football as they are not on the list. Neither is Army |
|
|
|
Post by chris92065 on Oct 2, 2024 18:17:46 GMT -8
This isn’t the Super League that the B1G and SEC are rumored to be discussing at their upcoming meeting on October 10th in Nashville. That meeting, which will include the B1G / SEC Advisory Board, is set to address the significant challenges currently facing college sports. These challenges—ranging from recent court rulings and ongoing litigation to inconsistent state laws and complex governance proposals—are prompting both conferences to take on a leadership role in shaping the future of college athletics. Notably, they did not invite the NCAA, the ACC, Big XII, PAC-12, or any Group of Five representatives to the discussion. As a result, the College Football Playoff (CFP) has essentially allowed these two conferences to manipulate the system and make decisions affecting every Division I football league and team in the country. As a result, the College Football Playoff (CFP) and NCAA has basically ceded control, allowing the B1G and SEC to manipulate the system dictating decisions impacting every Division I football league and team in the nation—all while serving their own interests. The NCAA holds no real governance over these conferences; there is no College Football Commissioner/Czar to hold them accountable, and no entity willing to step up and call out these power moves as fundamentally wrong. Even Jon Wilner and John Canzano suggested that the U.S. Senate should intervene, proposing legislation to regulate the college football landscape. This would encompass Playoffs, NIL , and, to ensure fair competition across all FBS schools and conferences. Yep, fair competition for all NCAA schools, players and fans, versus having the BIG & SEC Super League. This meeting takes place on October 10th. Please tell me which commissioner of a major sports league goes against the owners wishes? I don't see any. |
|
|
|
Post by Gundo on Oct 2, 2024 22:34:53 GMT -8
This isn’t the Super League that the B1G and SEC are rumored to be discussing at their upcoming meeting on October 10th in Nashville. That meeting, which will include the B1G / SEC Advisory Board, is set to address the significant challenges currently facing college sports. These challenges—ranging from recent court rulings and ongoing litigation to inconsistent state laws and complex governance proposals—are prompting both conferences to take on a leadership role in shaping the future of college athletics. Notably, they did not invite the NCAA, the ACC, Big XII, PAC-12, or any Group of Five representatives to the discussion. As a result, the College Football Playoff (CFP) has essentially allowed these two conferences to manipulate the system and make decisions affecting every Division I football league and team in the country. As a result, the College Football Playoff (CFP) and NCAA has basically ceded control, allowing the B1G and SEC to manipulate the system dictating decisions impacting every Division I football league and team in the nation—all while serving their own interests. The NCAA holds no real governance over these conferences; there is no College Football Commissioner/Czar to hold them accountable, and no entity willing to step up and call out these power moves as fundamentally wrong. Even Jon Wilner and John Canzano suggested that the U.S. Senate should intervene, proposing legislation to regulate the college football landscape. This would encompass Playoffs, NIL , and, to ensure fair competition across all FBS schools and conferences. Yep, fair competition for all NCAA schools, players and fans, versus having the BIG & SEC Super League. This meeting takes place on October 10th. Please tell me which commissioner of a major sports league goes against the owners wishes? I don't see any. altruism |
|
