|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 8, 2024 13:31:42 GMT -8
smith decides to pause the Trump charges and a judge agreed. These Jan. 6 charges from smith were political charges and election interference. What is sad is no one else here spoke out on this happening this week. Same goes for New York and Georgia to drop the Trump charges as well. After running a terrible court, judge merchan may be walking away 'without the stomach to jail a former president and president elect" from MSN News. Before criticizing this comment, this smith news was reported by Yahoo News, msnbc and others. Smith didn't decide anything. The DOJ has a long-standing policy of not prosecuting a sitting president. It's that simple. There's no way a trial happens before January with how successful delays have been for Trump throughout the process, so Smith consulted the DOJ (before Trump has the chance to fire him) and is closing the investigations. What's sad is your basic lack of understanding of our legal system and federal policy. It's been around a while. Intentionally misleading people and creating fake outrage out of ignorance is also sad. New York has not decided anything. That's a state case, with zero to do with Jack Smith. Same thing in Georgia, there was nothing imminent in terms of a trial, but nothing has been cast aside. The only "election interference" was Trump running in the face of indictments. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Nov 8, 2024 16:02:13 GMT -8
smith decides to pause the Trump charges and a judge agreed. These Jan. 6 charges from smith were political charges and election interference. What is sad is no one else here spoke out on this happening this week. Same goes for New York and Georgia to drop the Trump charges as well. After running a terrible court, judge merchan may be walking away 'without the stomach to jail a former president and president elect" from MSN News. Before criticizing this comment, this smith news was reported by Yahoo News, msnbc and others. Sorry, this doesn't pass the sniff test. If these prosecutions had started earlier there would have been enough time to sentence or convict t-rump. Trump was given more time than a normal criminal to prepare and appeal. The amount of slow walking allowed this clown is prett disturbing. Trump and the SC have normalized crime. Trump and his grifting family may be the biggest crooks in North America since Alvaro Obregon! |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Nov 9, 2024 19:35:03 GMT -8
I see no change, he still isn't fit to govern.
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Nov 9, 2024 21:12:51 GMT -8
I never thought that Trump would trounce her, or win the Popular Vote. I would have lost money if I bet on the Popular Vote, because I thought that was a lock for Harris.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 9, 2024 23:49:35 GMT -8
I never thought that Trump would trounce her, or win the Popular Vote. I would have lost money if I bet on the Popular Vote, because I thought was a lock for Harris. Nobody was "trounced." The swing state margins were so thin that a 1% shift would have gotten Harris to 270. |
|
|
|
Post by sdsuball on Nov 10, 2024 10:37:05 GMT -8
I never thought that Trump would trounce her, or win the Popular Vote. I would have lost money if I bet on the Popular Vote, because I thought that was a lock for Harris. Harris would have won the popular vote if she had been more popular with the Dem. base. She only got 58% of the vote in CA <her home state, no less> vs. Biden's 63% in 2020. If you're losing voters in your home state vs. four years ago, and you can't win the swing states, then you are very clearly doing something wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Nov 10, 2024 12:23:42 GMT -8
t-rump won the EC again but there was no landslide win. If that 2025 plan shite comes to pass perhaps the electorate will rebel and the Democrats will make some gains. TG we live in WA and Bob Ferguson is our governor.
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Nov 10, 2024 15:37:45 GMT -8
I never thought that Trump would trounce her, or win the Popular Vote. I would have lost money if I bet on the Popular Vote, because I thought was a lock for Harris. Nobody was "trounced." The swing state margins were so thin that a 1% shift would have gotten Harris to 270. Ok, I can change it to "beat her decisively." He won the seven swing states. That's something no one expected, as well as most likely to win the Popular Vote. Shoot, I thought Harris was going to win. Wow. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Nov 10, 2024 16:17:38 GMT -8
Sure, go ahead.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 10, 2024 19:18:11 GMT -8
Nobody was "trounced." The swing state margins were so thin that a 1% shift would have gotten Harris to 270. Ok, I can change it to "beat her decisively." He won the seven swing states. That's something no one expected, as well as most likely to win the Popular Vote. Shoot, I thought Harris was going to win. Wow. Wasn't all that "decisive" either. He won on thin margins due to a fundamental shift in the electorate. Every swing state was close. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Nov 10, 2024 20:33:11 GMT -8
Ok, I can change it to "beat her decisively." He won the seven swing states. That's something no one expected, as well as most likely to win the Popular Vote. Shoot, I thought Harris was going to win. Wow. Wasn't all that "decisive" either. He won on thin margins due to a fundamental shift in the electorate. Every swing state was close. It was definitely at the very least, decisive. I lean towards it being a landslide, and I'm not the only one. You've got liberals and Dems saying the same thing if they're being honest and unbiased. Also, you know what they say about being close, or almost. If your Aunt had balls...... |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 10, 2024 21:03:48 GMT -8
Wasn't all that "decisive" either. He won on thin margins due to a fundamental shift in the electorate. Every swing state was close. It was definitely at the very least, decisive. I lean towards it being a landslide, and I'm not the only one. You've got liberals and Dems saying the same thing if they're being honest and biased. Also, you know what they say about being close, or almost. If your Aunt had balls...... A 50.3% win is not a landslide. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Nov 10, 2024 23:04:40 GMT -8
It was definitely at the very least, decisive. I lean towards it being a landslide, and I'm not the only one. You've got liberals and Dems saying the same thing if they're being honest and biased. Also, you know what they say about being close, or almost. If your Aunt had balls...... A 50.3% win is not a landslide. Winning all 7 swing states that determines who wins the election is a landslide, no matter the percentage. I think Biden won 6 out of 7 last election. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Nov 10, 2024 23:06:40 GMT -8
Wasn't all that "decisive" either. He won on thin margins due to a fundamental shift in the electorate. Every swing state was close. It was definitely at the very least, decisive. I lean towards it being a landslide, and I'm not the only one. You've got liberals and Dems saying the same thing if they're being honest and biased. '84 was a landslide. This was extremely close compared to that. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Nov 10, 2024 23:12:15 GMT -8
It was definitely at the very least, decisive. I lean towards it being a landslide, and I'm not the only one. You've got liberals and Dems saying the same thing if they're being honest and biased. '84 was a landslide. This was extremely close compared to that. Obama had a definite landslide. I call Trump's win a landslide, or a near landslide, due to Trump sweeping all 7 battle ground states. |
|
|
|
Post by sdsuball on Nov 11, 2024 0:56:37 GMT -8
Wasn't all that "decisive" either. He won on thin margins due to a fundamental shift in the electorate. Every swing state was close. It was definitely at the very least, decisive. I lean towards it being a landslide, and I'm not the only one. You've got liberals and Dems saying the same thing if they're being honest and biased. Also, you know what they say about being close, or almost. If your Aunt had balls...... Decisive on the percentages, but I think that it felt like a stinging loss speaking to the manner in which Democratics lost. Losing young male voters, losing a share of Black and Latino voters, completely losing Arab Americans, horrible Democrat voter turnout in Kamala's home state (and the other uncontested states)... that's a pretty brutal way to lose, it's a painful defeat, and it is a very clear statement from both the Democrat base as well as the swing state voters that this way of doing things is not going to work for the party long term. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 11, 2024 8:05:48 GMT -8
It was definitely at the very least, decisive. I lean towards it being a landslide, and I'm not the only one. You've got liberals and Dems saying the same thing if they're being honest and biased. Also, you know what they say about being close, or almost. If your Aunt had balls...... Decisive on the percentages, but I think that it felt like a stinging loss speaking to the manner in which Democratics lost. Losing young male voters, losing a share of Black and Latino voters, completely losing Arab Americans, horrible Democrat voter turnout in Kamala's home state (and the other uncontested states)... that's a pretty brutal way to lose, it's a painful defeat, and it is a very clear statement from both the Democrat base as well as the swing state voters that this way of doing things is not going to work for the party long term. It's also part of a worldwide trend. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Nov 11, 2024 8:27:47 GMT -8
'84 was a landslide. This was extremely close compared to that. Obama had a definite landslide. I call Trump's win a landslide, or a near landslide, due to Trump sweeping all 7 battle ground states. In terms of overall vote percentage and percentage of Electoral votes it was still pretty close. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 11, 2024 8:37:02 GMT -8
A 50.3% win is not a landslide. Winning all 7 swing states that determines who wins the election is a landslide, no matter the percentage. I think Biden won 6 out of 7 last election. Look at the margins. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Nov 11, 2024 9:36:50 GMT -8
How much were Jimmy Kimmel and Robert Di Nero paid for crying?
It was easy to get a read on Oprah during the interview with Harris, with the cringe answers, left Oprah wondering if she was paid enough for exposing her reputation on National Media with her endorsement.
Beyonce was paid $10 Million for endorsement and crying on stage.
Harris spending $1.18 Billion on her campaign was a crazy. Elite Democrats are an exposed joke in America, and cooked for future elections. Trump needs to tax the sh*t out of these billionaire fools.
|
|
