|
|
Post by uwphoto on Aug 8, 2024 13:49:14 GMT -8
So...at best, he's sloppy, undisciplined and unprepared to know who the governor of Pennsylvania is. Or he's just flat out lying throughout the entire statement. But I'll point you back to the complexity (or lack thereof) in his speech, a telltale sign of diminished cognition. Your second paragraph is batshit insane and shows me you don't understand what you're looking at. Remember, this is the same individual who wanted to deploy the military to shoot unarmed protesters in front of the White House four years ago. Cognitive decline, plus emotional instability, plus malignant narcissistic tendencies equals someone who is not fit for the office of the presidency. Your second paragraph is actually the one that's bats**t crazy. His decision making four years ago had zero to do with dementia, or cognitive decline in that capacity, and more about a power trip from someone that can be trigger happy, etc.... Not even close to a good comparison by you. Your third paragraph contains reasons not to vote for him, just not the cognitive decline one. You're making that out to be more than it is, and I understand why you do that. Well John, he did ask his staff (while he was president) about nuking hurricanes. This is just a small example of many...but makes you wonder what's wrong with this guy? Has lived in a bubble all his life, enabled, not a diverse education, not curious?..or just plain nuts. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 13:52:14 GMT -8
So...at best, he's sloppy, undisciplined and unprepared to know who the governor of Pennsylvania is. Or he's just flat out lying throughout the entire statement. But I'll point you back to the complexity (or lack thereof) in his speech, a telltale sign of diminished cognition. Your second paragraph is batshit insane and shows me you don't understand what you're looking at. Remember, this is the same individual who wanted to deploy the military to shoot unarmed protesters in front of the White House four years ago. Cognitive decline, plus emotional instability, plus malignant narcissistic tendencies equals someone who is not fit for the office of the presidency. Your second paragraph is actually the one that's bats**t crazy. His decision making four years ago had zero to do with dementia, or cognitive decline in that capacity, and more about a power trip from someone that can be trigger happy, etc.... Not even close to a good comparison by you. Your third paragraph contains reasons not to vote for him, just not the cognitive decline one. You're making that out to be more than it is, and I understand why you do that. That's your *opinion* (which isn't backed up by anything, of course, relevant to the situation here.) I understand you support Trump...but again, a bridge too far. This isn't about partisan politics, it's about danger to the country. There are correlations you're missing here. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 13:53:52 GMT -8
What about Trump honestly thinking that Nikki Haley was Nancy Pelosi and was in charge of Capital Security on January 6th? He went on and on about that, it wasn't just mixing up names, it was mixing up people and their jobs. SERIOUS congative problem. It's not a SERIOUS issue. Come on. You and Ryan should just stick to the other multiple, legitimate reasons why someone shouldn't vote for him. You and Ryan, mainly, started bringing up that Trump also has a cognitive decline once it became a main topic concerning Biden. Fishing for videos, etc.... Nobody's going to be perfect on every video you find. You can find stuff all day long on a lot of people, young and old, of you really want to. I've been talking about this for well over a year, long before Biden's debate gaffe. You can stop making excuses any time. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 14:01:06 GMT -8
I'll say this again and include a very personal story to illustrate why this is important: Cognitive decline takes on many forms. Missing memories, words, confusion, disorientation, emotional connection/stability, depression, impulse control and others. Some of it is benign, some of it is very serious.
My dad died at 61. He was in early onset dementia (and we didn't recognize it at all) until he got lost in an airport. He ended up sitting down at a gate area and we couldn't find him anywhere. We ended up paging him and eventually found him. His words still haunt me, 20 plus years later.
"I thought you left me."
My grandmother was diagnosed with Alzheimer's at 64. It was very innocuous at first. Memory blanks, random events and stories eventually progressed. The last two years of her life, she was non-verbal, couldn't recognize anyone and would stare into oblivion.
The point is this: It's not about politics. I've made no bones about it, I don't like Donald Trump the politician or the person. But the office of the presidency requires a degree of transparency and competency that he doesn't possess, and a significant portion of that is due to his neurological function.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Aug 8, 2024 14:04:24 GMT -8
What about Trump honestly thinking that Nikki Haley was Nancy Pelosi and was in charge of Capital Security on January 6th? He went on and on about that, it wasn't just mixing up names, it was mixing up people and their jobs. SERIOUS congative problem. It's not a SERIOUS issue. Come on. You and Ryan should just stick to the other multiple, legitimate reasons why someone shouldn't vote for him. You and Ryan, mainly, started bringing up that Trump also has a cognitive decline once it became a main topic concerning Biden. Fishing for videos, etc.... Nobody's going to be perfect on every video you find. You can find stuff all day long on a lot of people, young and old, of you really want to. Again, I do not believe for a second that Trump is sharper than Biden, cognitively. I found the, "Biden is senile," stuff to be really weak and way off the track. There's a world of difference between mixing up names (Biden), and mixing up people (Trump). Neither one should be running for President in 2024. Oh, yeah, one of them figured that out, the other has too big of an ego and too much of a control fetish to ever let go. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 14:09:59 GMT -8
It's not a SERIOUS issue. Come on. You and Ryan should just stick to the other multiple, legitimate reasons why someone shouldn't vote for him. You and Ryan, mainly, started bringing up that Trump also has a cognitive decline once it became a main topic concerning Biden. Fishing for videos, etc.... Nobody's going to be perfect on every video you find. You can find stuff all day long on a lot of people, young and old, of you really want to. Again, I do not believe for a second that Trump is sharper than Biden, cognitively. I found the, "Biden is senile," stuff to be really weak and way off the track. There's a world of difference between mixing up names (Biden), and mixing up people (Trump). Neither one should be running for President in 2024. Oh, yeah, one of them figured that out, the other has too big of an ego and too much of a control fetish to ever let go. You're barely scratching the surface here. It's not even so much about mixing up names or even people, it's the associated things that come with all of that. If you're in a state of decline, every decision you make should be called into question. The lack of impulse control, the anger outbursts, the emotional turmoil...and we haven't touched on the actual events that have happened since the shooting in Butler. PTSD, survivor's guilt, psychological imbalances? That stuff is real. It's very real. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 8, 2024 14:11:57 GMT -8
Your second paragraph is actually the one that's bats**t crazy. His decision making four years ago had zero to do with dementia, or cognitive decline in that capacity, and more about a power trip from someone that can be trigger happy, etc.... Not even close to a good comparison by you. Your third paragraph contains reasons not to vote for him, just not the cognitive decline one. You're making that out to be more than it is, and I understand why you do that. That's your *opinion* (which isn't backed up by anything, of course, relevant to the situation here.) I understand you support Trump...but again, a bridge too far. This isn't about partisan politics, it's about danger to the country. There are correlations you're missing here. Too funny. You love that troll remark insinuating that William is a Trump supporter, and that I am. VERY childish, because that's all you got when someone disagrees with you on an issue regarding him. I could bring up 6 reasons not to vote for Trump, but if I don't agree with you on even one issue regarding him, you throw out there, "He's a Trump supporter." Lol. Have at it, but it doesn't work. Do better. |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Aug 8, 2024 14:12:17 GMT -8
I can’t believe whackos are buying into this. It is as crazy as staffers saying when Kamala was in SF she did tricks for Johns, judges, politicians and various powerful businessmen. As dumb as that is, that’s much more likely with the dozens of photos circulating now. This is the winner of the dumbest thread of the year by a country mile, but partisan hacks love it.
Now is time for the resident stalker to chime in with a worthless reply. Come on, you can do it, your ego can't resist. You know who you are.
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 8, 2024 14:12:53 GMT -8
It's not a SERIOUS issue. Come on. You and Ryan should just stick to the other multiple, legitimate reasons why someone shouldn't vote for him. You and Ryan, mainly, started bringing up that Trump also has a cognitive decline once it became a main topic concerning Biden. Fishing for videos, etc.... Nobody's going to be perfect on every video you find. You can find stuff all day long on a lot of people, young and old, of you really want to. Again, I do not believe for a second that Trump is sharper than Biden, cognitively. I found the, "Biden is senile," stuff to be really weak and way off the track. There's a world of difference between mixing up names (Biden), and mixing up people (Trump). Neither one should be running for President in 2024. Oh, yeah, one of them figured that out, the other has too big of an ego and too much of a control fetish to ever let go. I completely agree with you that they both should not be running. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 8, 2024 14:15:35 GMT -8
Again, I do not believe for a second that Trump is sharper than Biden, cognitively. I found the, "Biden is senile," stuff to be really weak and way off the track. There's a world of difference between mixing up names (Biden), and mixing up people (Trump). Neither one should be running for President in 2024. Oh, yeah, one of them figured that out, the other has too big of an ego and too much of a control fetish to ever let go. You're barely scratching the surface here. It's not even so much about mixing up names or even people, it's the associated things that come with all of that. If you're in a state of decline, every decision you make should be called into question. The lack of impulse control, the anger outbursts, the emotional turmoil...and we haven't touched on the actual events that have happened since the shooting in Butler. PTSD, survivor's guilt, psychological imbalances? That stuff is real. It's very real. Give me a break. He's been the same since 2016. Same schtick. Sheesh. Get real. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Aug 8, 2024 14:18:46 GMT -8
I can’t believe whackos are buying into this. It is as crazy as staffers saying when Kamala was in SF she did tricks for Johns, judges, politicians and various powerful businessmen. As dumb as that is, that’s much more likely with the dozens of photos circulating now. This is the winner of the dumbest thread of the year by a country mile, but partisan hacks love it. Now is time for the resident stalker to chime in with a worthless reply. Come on, you can do it, your ego can't resist. You know who you are.
And yet we had people on THIS board saying for months that Biden had dementia, and they were absolutely serious about it. Trump shows more signs of dementia than Biden ever did, so, tit for tat, this thread. The thing is, I do believe that Trump is noticeably declining mentally. Now, he was incredibly stupid to begin with, so it's hard to tell sometimes, but there are obvious signs. He has no business running for office. PERIOD. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 8, 2024 14:23:06 GMT -8
Your second paragraph is actually the one that's bats**t crazy. His decision making four years ago had zero to do with dementia, or cognitive decline in that capacity, and more about a power trip from someone that can be trigger happy, etc.... Not even close to a good comparison by you. Your third paragraph contains reasons not to vote for him, just not the cognitive decline one. You're making that out to be more than it is, and I understand why you do that. Well John, he did ask his staff (while he was president) about nuking hurricanes. This is just a small example of many...but makes you wonder what's wrong with this guy? Has lived in a bubble all his life, enabled, not a diverse education, not curious?..or just plain nuts. I agree that he's nuts, and he's led a privileged life. I'm not voting for the guy for several reasons, but it's not because he has cognitive decline. I think he has the typical decline that anybody his age would have, but it's not so bad that he would push the button, in my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 14:30:31 GMT -8
That's your *opinion* (which isn't backed up by anything, of course, relevant to the situation here.) I understand you support Trump...but again, a bridge too far. This isn't about partisan politics, it's about danger to the country. There are correlations you're missing here. Too funny. You love that troll remark insinuating that William is a Trump supporter, and that I am. VERY childish, because that's all you got when someone disagrees with you on an issue regarding him. I could bring up 6 reasons not to vote for Trump, but if I don't agree with you on even one issue regarding him, you throw out there, "He's a Trump supporter." Lol. Have at it, but it doesn't work. Do better. It makes sense, though. You go to extremes (without ever going in depth) to try and stump for him. Compare this 2018 press conference to what you see above. It's wildly different. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 14:32:05 GMT -8
I can’t believe whackos are buying into this. It is as crazy as staffers saying when Kamala was in SF she did tricks for Johns, judges, politicians and various powerful businessmen. As dumb as that is, that’s much more likely with the dozens of photos circulating now. This is the winner of the dumbest thread of the year by a country mile, but partisan hacks love it. Now is time for the resident stalker to chime in with a worthless reply. Come on, you can do it, your ego can't resist. You know who you are.
You're weird, man. That's all I've got. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 14:33:11 GMT -8
You're barely scratching the surface here. It's not even so much about mixing up names or even people, it's the associated things that come with all of that. If you're in a state of decline, every decision you make should be called into question. The lack of impulse control, the anger outbursts, the emotional turmoil...and we haven't touched on the actual events that have happened since the shooting in Butler. PTSD, survivor's guilt, psychological imbalances? That stuff is real. It's very real. Give me a break. He's been the same since 2016. Same schtick. Sheesh. Get real. I understand you don't understand. Lazy archetypes like this, though, don't benefit anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 14:36:57 GMT -8
Well John, he did ask his staff (while he was president) about nuking hurricanes. This is just a small example of many...but makes you wonder what's wrong with this guy? Has lived in a bubble all his life, enabled, not a diverse education, not curious?..or just plain nuts. I agree that he's nuts, and he's led a privileged life. I'm not voting for the guy for several reasons, but it's not because he has cognitive decline. I think he has the typical decline that anybody his age would have, but it's not so bad that he would push the button, in my opinion. "But it's not so bad that he push the button" is perhaps the silliest phrase we've seen. That's not the point of the exercise. What about virtually anything else? Literally anything. There are dozens of ways you can disrupt or endanger a country or an ally. Four years is a long time when your people were hiding security briefings from you five years ago. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 8, 2024 15:05:48 GMT -8
Too funny. You love that troll remark insinuating that William is a Trump supporter, and that I am. VERY childish, because that's all you got when someone disagrees with you on an issue regarding him. I could bring up 6 reasons not to vote for Trump, but if I don't agree with you on even one issue regarding him, you throw out there, "He's a Trump supporter." Lol. Have at it, but it doesn't work. Do better. It makes sense, though. You go to extremes (without ever going in depth) to try and stump for him. Compare this 2018 press conference to what you see above. It's wildly different. No, that's not it at all. Extremes? That's just how you want to see it. Again, any questioning of your opinions on Trump and you decide they're Trump supporters. Get over yourself bud. It's the overboard, ridiculous, extreme comments that you make. For just one example, "It looked fake to me." I mean that's how far you go. Going way overboard like you do at times, is not acceptable and ridiculous. You need to be kept in check because some of your rants are just absolutely ridiculous, crazy stuff. I get it. You've got it bad, so you'll throw over the top stuff out there. I'm just not here to digest it. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 8, 2024 15:14:19 GMT -8
Give me a break. He's been the same since 2016. Same schtick. Sheesh. Get real. I understand you don't understand. Lazy archetypes like this, though, don't benefit anyone. Oh, I understand perfectly. You're an over the top Trump hater that will go to any lengths, and say any ridiculous, over the top stuff and won't care what you say. You've made that perfectly clear. It's really hard to take you serious. At least you've somewhat owned up to it when you admitted that you'll go to all lengths to keep him out of office and let everyone know. That's ok, but don't be that guy that you can't take serious. You know, the guy that will stretch stuff further out than Gumby. Just some friendly advice |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 15:22:25 GMT -8
It makes sense, though. You go to extremes (without ever going in depth) to try and stump for him. Compare this 2018 press conference to what you see above. It's wildly different. No, that's not it at all. Extremes? That's just how you want to see it. Again, any questioning of your opinions on Trump and you decide they're Trump supporters. Get over yourself bud. It's the overboard, ridiculous, extreme comments that you make. For just one example, "It looked fake to me." I mean that's how far you go. Going way overboard like you do at times, is not acceptable and ridiculous. You need to be kept in check because some of your rants are just absolutely ridiculous, crazy stuff. I get it. You've got it bad, so you'll throw over the top stuff out there. I'm just not here to digest it. When you can't argue facts... |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 8, 2024 15:28:31 GMT -8
I understand you don't understand. Lazy archetypes like this, though, don't benefit anyone. Oh, I understand perfectly. You're an over the top Trump hater that will go to any lengths, and say any ridiculous, over the top stuff and won't care what you say. You've made that perfectly clear. It's really hard to take you serious. At least you've somewhat owned up to it when you admitted that you'll go to all lengths to keep him out of office and let everyone know. That's ok, but don't be that guy that you can't take serious. You know, the guy that will stretch stuff further out than Gumby. Just some friendly advice Again, when you can't argue facts, all you have is TDS. As I've said multiple times now, this isn't about politics. It's about experience. It's about understanding what you're seeing. What you see as "over the top" is anything but. Open up a social media app and you'll see hundreds of thousands of people who make my perspective look tame. Context is everything. Whether or not you take me seriously isn't really important to me. It's readily apparent that you're pro-Trump, to whatever degree that extends. Not saying you'll vote for him or not, which doesn't matter...but an inability to listen to reason and explain everything away speaks loudly. |
|
