|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 27, 2024 8:46:02 GMT -8
Because A) You're not a mod and B) It's often a short-sighted attempt to start an argument. Why? Scroll on by. Doesn't affect you in the slightest. Fact check what? I literally said nothing. Didn't we have this same discussion a few days ago? Where you were...wrong? Like, what's the point? You can infer what I think from a one word post? Man, you should be a telepathic mind reader, you missed your calling. You read a Newsweek article and cherrypick one sentence and suddenly you're an expert in credibility? Shocking. There's nothing to fact check, the story hasn't come out. Other sources have said there's definitely legs to the story, so maybe you should do some investigating instead of harassing me. I don't want your advice, don't need your advice and I don't care to hear it. I'm not flustered. You're just incredibly annoying and add nothing of substance here. Your idea of critical thought is "Well, both sides are doing this and water is wet." Like, good. Great. But also useless. Just say nothing, we are both better off that way. Shoot, to you, anything that's negative towards Trump has legs on it, that's obvious, especially with this crap video you decided to post amongst other things. Come on now. You think it's the "hm" that it's in question? No, it's you posting that video at all. It's disingenuous. You only played a snippet of what he said. The guy in the video that you decided to post, said that he didn't believe it himself. How about this idea, don't froth at the mouth to get it out, and take a look at the whole video instead of just a snippet when a person is saying that they can end someone's election with a story. That would be responsible. Of course someone would want to look into what you posted. It's very threatening. He said that it's typical that people right about now, will throw out these National Enquirer stories right before election day and you decided to post it. Weird. How about you not posting crap videos, and articles that you're wrong about. You're very annoying when you do. We're both better off that way. What makes it a "crap" video? The fact that you're a biased, conservative Trump apologist? Sorry, not my concern. The stories we HAVE seen come from the Trump campaign are newsworthy and they shape the election. I will not post what people are actively speculating the story could be, since we have nothing on the record. That's called personal responsibility. Why is it in disingenous? You sound mad just to be mad. Like I said, it has nothing to do with you, so just scroll on by. Not complicated, not difficult. I posted what I saw. If that hurts your feelings, then maybe the problem is with your political identity and lack of awareness. Again, not my concern. I would be glad to end Trump's campaign. He's a disgrace. If only I had that type of power. That's something everyone not in a cult should agree on. Sounds like more of a you problem than a National Enquirer diatribe. Maybe you just don't want it to be true? Hm. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 27, 2024 8:54:37 GMT -8
Because A) You're not a mod and B) It's often a short-sighted attempt to start an argument. Why? Scroll on by. Doesn't affect you in the slightest. Fact check what? I literally said nothing. Didn't we have this same discussion a few days ago? Where you were...wrong? Like, what's the point? You can infer what I think from a one word post? Man, you should be a telepathic mind reader, you missed your calling. You read a Newsweek article and cherrypick one sentence and suddenly you're an expert in credibility? Shocking. There's nothing to fact check, the story hasn't come out. Other sources have said there's definitely legs to the story, so maybe you should do some investigating instead of harassing me. I don't want your advice, don't need your advice and I don't care to hear it. I'm not flustered. You're just incredibly annoying and add nothing of substance here. Your idea of critical thought is "Well, both sides are doing this and water is wet." Like, good. Great. But also useless. Just say nothing, we are both better off that way. Shoot, to you, anything that's negative towards Trump has legs on it, that's obvious, especially with this crap video you decided to post amongst other things. Come on now. You think it's the "hm" that it's in question? No, it's you posting that video at all. It's disingenuous. You only played a snippet of what he said. The guy in the video that you decided to post, said that he didn't believe it himself. How about this idea, don't froth at the mouth to get it out, and take a look at the whole video instead of just a snippet when a person is saying that they can end someone's election with a story. That would be responsible. Of course someone would want to look into what you posted. It's very threatening. He said that it's typical that people right about now, will throw out these National Enquirer stories right before election day and you decided to post it. Weird. How about you not posting crap videos, and articles that you're wrong about. You're very annoying when you do. We're both better off that way. This election is vitally important to shape the immediate future of our country. If I have to bulldoze through your wishy-washy, both sides campaign of "let's be fair" - I absolutely will without apology. If Kamala Harris was actively endorsed by a foreign, hostile government, I'd call that crap out, too. But she's, you know, again...not. If Kamala Harris was an adjudicated rapist, I'd call that out, too, but she's...not. I'll make this clear again: Harris wouldn't be my preferred candidate in a weak cycle of candidates. I'm not a Harris superfan....at all. But I dislike fascism. I dislike Project 2025. I dislike JD Vance's sociopathic, fraudulent persona. I dislike rapists, people that idolize and venerate Adolf Hitler. If you have a problem with that, then you have bigger issues than anything I type on this website. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 27, 2024 11:40:41 GMT -8
Shoot, to you, anything that's negative towards Trump has legs on it, that's obvious, especially with this crap video you decided to post amongst other things. Come on now. You think it's the "hm" that it's in question? No, it's you posting that video at all. It's disingenuous. You only played a snippet of what he said. The guy in the video that you decided to post, said that he didn't believe it himself. How about this idea, don't froth at the mouth to get it out, and take a look at the whole video instead of just a snippet when a person is saying that they can end someone's election with a story. That would be responsible. Of course someone would want to look into what you posted. It's very threatening. He said that it's typical that people right about now, will throw out these National Enquirer stories right before election day and you decided to post it. Weird. How about you not posting crap videos, and articles that you're wrong about. You're very annoying when you do. We're both better off that way. What makes it a "crap" video? The fact that you're a biased, conservative Trump apologist? Sorry, not my concern. The stories we HAVE seen come from the Trump campaign are newsworthy and they shape the election. I will not post what people are actively speculating the story could be, since we have nothing on the record. That's called personal responsibility. Why is it in disingenous? You sound mad just to be mad. Like I said, it has nothing to do with you, so just scroll on by. Not complicated, not difficult. I posted what I saw. If that hurts your feelings, then maybe the problem is with your political identity and lack of awareness. Again, not my concern. I would be glad to end Trump's campaign. He's a disgrace. If only I had that type of power. That's something everyone not in a cult should agree on. Sounds like more of a you problem than a National Enquirer diatribe. Maybe you just don't want it to be true? Hm. If I have to explain to you why it's a crap video, then you have bigger issues than once thought. You're going to defend a video where the guy making the video says that he doesn't believe it to be true, but oh boy, if it was true he'd be done. Anybody can claim anything they want, true or not. See how that works? Get a grip. Don't defend the indefensible. Sheesh. Your problem, and you know it, is that you decided throw at a click bait video without watching the whole thing because you were frothing at the mouth since it was negative towards Trump. Own it, but your ego won't let you. What a shame. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 27, 2024 13:23:58 GMT -8
What makes it a "crap" video? The fact that you're a biased, conservative Trump apologist? Sorry, not my concern. The stories we HAVE seen come from the Trump campaign are newsworthy and they shape the election. I will not post what people are actively speculating the story could be, since we have nothing on the record. That's called personal responsibility. Why is it in disingenous? You sound mad just to be mad. Like I said, it has nothing to do with you, so just scroll on by. Not complicated, not difficult. I posted what I saw. If that hurts your feelings, then maybe the problem is with your political identity and lack of awareness. Again, not my concern. I would be glad to end Trump's campaign. He's a disgrace. If only I had that type of power. That's something everyone not in a cult should agree on. Sounds like more of a you problem than a National Enquirer diatribe. Maybe you just don't want it to be true? Hm. If I have to explain to you why it's a crap video, then you have bigger issues than once thought. You're going to defend a video where the guy making the video says that he doesn't believe it to be true, but oh boy, if it was true he'd be done. Anybody can claim anything they want, true or not. See how that works? Get a grip. Don't defend the indefensible. Sheesh. Your problem, and you know it, is that you decided throw at a click bait video without watching the whole thing because you were frothing at the mouth since it was negative towards Trump. Own it, but your ego won't let you. What a shame. I'm not defending anything. You're imagining things. When things are posted without comment...they are without comment. Usually for a reason. Halperin (A guy who works for the most Trump-friendly network in existence) isn't the only person talking about the story, but the fact he even brought it up is noteworthy. If you haven't learned by now that most of what is said about Trump has foundations to it, then you're better off just not responding. I'm not changing the way I operate to suit your needs. The indefensible here is Donald Trump. Nobody was frothing at the mouth, that's the third time you've said that. Instead of being hyperbolic and illogical, just focus on the truth. Or at least attempt to. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 27, 2024 14:28:55 GMT -8
If I have to explain to you why it's a crap video, then you have bigger issues than once thought. You're going to defend a video where the guy making the video says that he doesn't believe it to be true, but oh boy, if it was true he'd be done. Anybody can claim anything they want, true or not. See how that works? Get a grip. Don't defend the indefensible. Sheesh. Your problem, and you know it, is that you decided throw at a click bait video without watching the whole thing because you were frothing at the mouth since it was negative towards Trump. Own it, but your ego won't let you. What a shame. I'm not defending anything. You're imagining things. When things are posted without comment...they are without comment. Usually for a reason. Halperin (A guy who works for the most Trump-friendly network in existence) isn't the only person talking about the story, but the fact he even brought it up is noteworthy. If you haven't learned by now that most of what is said about Trump has foundations to it, then you're better off just not responding. I'm not changing the way I operate to suit your needs. The indefensible here is Donald Trump. Nobody was frothing at the mouth, that's the third time you've said that. Instead of being hyperbolic and illogical, just focus on the truth. Or at least attempt to. I am focusing on the truth, and the truth is that Halperin himself said that he didn't believe it. The video you played was very misleading, Ryan. Yes, there's a lot about Trump that's indefensible, but when someone goes to lengths of showing only a snippet of a video, a video when looked at in totality, which is what should be done for context, is not comparable, at all, to the snippet. It just comes across as another desperate attempt to condemn Trump, when you don't have to do that. He does a great job at that all by himself, that's for sure. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 27, 2024 15:35:05 GMT -8
I'm not defending anything. You're imagining things. When things are posted without comment...they are without comment. Usually for a reason. Halperin (A guy who works for the most Trump-friendly network in existence) isn't the only person talking about the story, but the fact he even brought it up is noteworthy. If you haven't learned by now that most of what is said about Trump has foundations to it, then you're better off just not responding. I'm not changing the way I operate to suit your needs. The indefensible here is Donald Trump. Nobody was frothing at the mouth, that's the third time you've said that. Instead of being hyperbolic and illogical, just focus on the truth. Or at least attempt to. I am focusing on the truth, and the truth is that Halperin himself said that he didn't believe it. The video you played was very misleading, Ryan. Yes, there's a lot about Trump that's indefensible, but when someone goes to lengths of showing only a snippet of a video, a video when looked at in totality, which is what should be done for context, is not comparable, at all, to the snippet. It just comes across as another desperate attempt to condemn Trump, when you don't have to do that. He does a great job at that all by himself, that's for sure. Whether he believes it or not doesn't change the fact it exists. Like I said, he's not the only one talking about it. It's multi-sourced, yet people are afraid of political retribution considering Trump's history of attacking the press and undermining credibility. This is a losing argument. There was nothing misleading about the video whatsoever. People can form their opinions. I didn't go to any lengths. I saw a video, I posted it. Pretty easy. You're once again pandering to the less than bright, which I'm not going to do. Trump should be condemned. Not my problem. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 27, 2024 15:53:48 GMT -8
I am focusing on the truth, and the truth is that Halperin himself said that he didn't believe it. The video you played was very misleading, Ryan. Yes, there's a lot about Trump that's indefensible, but when someone goes to lengths of showing only a snippet of a video, a video when looked at in totality, which is what should be done for context, is not comparable, at all, to the snippet. It just comes across as another desperate attempt to condemn Trump, when you don't have to do that. He does a great job at that all by himself, that's for sure. Whether he believes it or not doesn't change the fact it exists. Like I said, he's not the only one talking about it. It's multi-sourced, yet people are afraid of political retribution considering Trump's history of attacking the press and undermining credibility. This is a losing argument. There was nothing misleading about the video whatsoever. People can form their opinions. I didn't go to any lengths. I saw a video, I posted it. Pretty easy. You're once again pandering to the less than bright, which I'm not going to do. Trump should be condemned. Not my problem. I'll have to say, the snippet you posted isn't as misleading as I thought after looking at it again, but I would never post a snippet of anything. He goes on to say that he doesn't believe it and things are thrown out there like this all the time at this time of year during an election. The snippet is sensationalism. Making it to be more than it is for clicks. That's VERY obvious. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 27, 2024 16:01:44 GMT -8
Whether he believes it or not doesn't change the fact it exists. Like I said, he's not the only one talking about it. It's multi-sourced, yet people are afraid of political retribution considering Trump's history of attacking the press and undermining credibility. This is a losing argument. There was nothing misleading about the video whatsoever. People can form their opinions. I didn't go to any lengths. I saw a video, I posted it. Pretty easy. You're once again pandering to the less than bright, which I'm not going to do. Trump should be condemned. Not my problem. I'll have to say, the snippet you posted isn't as misleading as I thought after looking at it again, but I would never post a snippet of anything. He goes on to say that he doesn't believe it and things are thrown out there like this all the time at this time of year during an election. The snippet is sensationalism. Making it to be more than it is for clicks. That's VERY obvious. Good for you? I don't care, at all. The relevant part is included in the snippet, I would never count on Newsmax to investigate anything that runs counter to Trump's success. It's Newsmax. Once again, he's not the only one talking about it. Your inate desire to absolve Trump of literally everything is bizarre. Not everything needs your blessing. We've come too far as it is. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 27, 2024 16:51:20 GMT -8
I'll have to say, the snippet you posted isn't as misleading as I thought after looking at it again, but I would never post a snippet of anything. He goes on to say that he doesn't believe it and things are thrown out there like this all the time at this time of year during an election. The snippet is sensationalism. Making it to be more than it is for clicks. That's VERY obvious. Good for you? I don't care, at all. The relevant part is included in the snippet, I would never count on Newsmax to investigate anything that runs counter to Trump's success. It's Newsmax. Once again, he's not the only one talking about it. Your inate desire to absolve Trump of literally everything is bizarre. Not everything needs your blessing. We've come too far as it is. Literally everything? No, just the ridiculous stuff like this. Ha!!! There you go again with your dramatic ways. Sheesh, again. He's the only one getting bombarded with everything, but the kitchen. Most of it deservedly so, but then there's the occasional snippet video stuff, for example, that you throw out there that needs to be corroborated and get the full context of it, and you don't like that, because you're called out on it. I get why you do what you do, but just remember that when you go overboard like that, it's very laughable and you lose credibility. I'm sure you don't care about that, but just know that it is, and you do. You get pissed off when ANYONE challenges you, especially when it comes to Trump. You should work on that, especially when you're wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 27, 2024 17:12:09 GMT -8
Good for you? I don't care, at all. The relevant part is included in the snippet, I would never count on Newsmax to investigate anything that runs counter to Trump's success. It's Newsmax. Once again, he's not the only one talking about it. Your inate desire to absolve Trump of literally everything is bizarre. Not everything needs your blessing. We've come too far as it is. Literally everything? No, just the ridiculous stuff like this. Ha!!! There you go again with your dramatic ways. Sheesh, again. He's the only one getting bombarded with everything, but the kitchen. Most of it deservedly so, but then there's the occasional snippet video stuff, for example, that you throw out there that needs to be corroborated and get the full context of it, and you don't like that, because you're called out on it. I get why you do what you do, but just remember that when you go overboard like that, it's very laughable and you lose credibility. I'm sure you don't care about that, but just know that it is, and you do. You get pissed off when ANYONE challenges you, especially when it comes to Trump. You should work on that, especially when you're wrong. Yes, pretty much everything, optically speaking. That's why you point to both sides unapologetically and equate, or attempt to, their actions and statements. It's nonsense. Truly. It would be nonsense if anyone said it, that's not directed specifically at you in particular. It's a disservice to all involved. Step back for a moment and realize what's actually important here: Whether or not the story comes to fruition, you have reporters in print media AFRAID of POLITICAL RETRIBUTION. We have a free press, correct? And before you tangent off, I'm not referring specifically to this story. It's a comprehensive list that we have - The lack of endorsements, the burying of stories, the softball coverage of Trump's crimes, the normalization of outstandingly vile behavior and hate speech. It all matters and it all adds up. What exactly is he getting "bombarded" with? (This is, again, perceptionally, an apologist mindset.) How short our memories are: In July, after the debate, prior to his withdrawal from the race, Biden was lambasted from every angle for WEEKS. Weeks. I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself: I don't care what you do in terms of a "callout." (This isn't real life, again.) I'm not "upset" at anything other than your repeated attempts to misconstrue and whitewash. There is no "overboard" here. That's a lack of critical thinking skills, which I can't help with. You're not challenging me. You're just lowering yourself to a level that is embarrassing on its merits to try and explain away Trump's behavior. That's unfortunate. You can say I'm wrong all you want, but only one of us is actually capable of delivering evidence. The fact you think an expanded video matters to the actual point being made is a fool's errand and misses the point being made. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 27, 2024 19:49:57 GMT -8
Literally everything? No, just the ridiculous stuff like this. Ha!!! There you go again with your dramatic ways. Sheesh, again. He's the only one getting bombarded with everything, but the kitchen. Most of it deservedly so, but then there's the occasional snippet video stuff, for example, that you throw out there that needs to be corroborated and get the full context of it, and you don't like that, because you're called out on it. I get why you do what you do, but just remember that when you go overboard like that, it's very laughable and you lose credibility. I'm sure you don't care about that, but just know that it is, and you do. You get pissed off when ANYONE challenges you, especially when it comes to Trump. You should work on that, especially when you're wrong. Yes, pretty much everything, optically speaking. That's why you point to both sides unapologetically and equate, or attempt to, their actions and statements. It's nonsense. Truly. It would be nonsense if anyone said it, that's not directed specifically at you in particular. It's a disservice to all involved. Step back for a moment and realize what's actually important here: Whether or not the story comes to fruition, you have reporters in print media AFRAID of POLITICAL RETRIBUTION. We have a free press, correct? And before you tangent off, I'm not referring specifically to this story. It's a comprehensive list that we have - The lack of endorsements, the burying of stories, the softball coverage of Trump's crimes, the normalization of outstandingly vile behavior and hate speech. It all matters and it all adds up. What exactly is he getting "bombarded" with? (This is, again, perceptionally, an apologist mindset.) How short our memories are: In July, after the debate, prior to his withdrawal from the race, Biden was lambasted from every angle for WEEKS. Weeks. I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself: I don't care what you do in terms of a "callout." (This isn't real life, again.) I'm not "upset" at anything other than your repeated attempts to misconstrue and whitewash. There is no "overboard" here. That's a lack of critical thinking skills, which I can't help with. You're not challenging me. You're just lowering yourself to a level that is embarrassing on its merits to try and explain away Trump's behavior. That's unfortunate. You can say I'm wrong all you want, but only one of us is actually capable of delivering evidence. The fact you think an expanded video matters to the actual point being made is a fool's errand and misses the point being made. Uh, ok Ryan. Preach!!! |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 27, 2024 21:11:15 GMT -8
This probably makes more sense here.  |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 27, 2024 21:26:14 GMT -8
Yes, pretty much everything, optically speaking. That's why you point to both sides unapologetically and equate, or attempt to, their actions and statements. It's nonsense. Truly. It would be nonsense if anyone said it, that's not directed specifically at you in particular. It's a disservice to all involved. Step back for a moment and realize what's actually important here: Whether or not the story comes to fruition, you have reporters in print media AFRAID of POLITICAL RETRIBUTION. We have a free press, correct? And before you tangent off, I'm not referring specifically to this story. It's a comprehensive list that we have - The lack of endorsements, the burying of stories, the softball coverage of Trump's crimes, the normalization of outstandingly vile behavior and hate speech. It all matters and it all adds up. What exactly is he getting "bombarded" with? (This is, again, perceptionally, an apologist mindset.) How short our memories are: In July, after the debate, prior to his withdrawal from the race, Biden was lambasted from every angle for WEEKS. Weeks. I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself: I don't care what you do in terms of a "callout." (This isn't real life, again.) I'm not "upset" at anything other than your repeated attempts to misconstrue and whitewash. There is no "overboard" here. That's a lack of critical thinking skills, which I can't help with. You're not challenging me. You're just lowering yourself to a level that is embarrassing on its merits to try and explain away Trump's behavior. That's unfortunate. You can say I'm wrong all you want, but only one of us is actually capable of delivering evidence. The fact you think an expanded video matters to the actual point being made is a fool's errand and misses the point being made. Uh, ok Ryan. Preach!!! I care about the truth. No preaching required. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 27, 2024 22:07:22 GMT -8
Wow. The speakers at the Republican rally in NYC aren't even trying to hide it anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Oct 28, 2024 4:53:03 GMT -8
Wow. The speakers at the Republican rally in NYC aren't even trying to hide it anymore. Having seen clips from this rally, it is just tragic what has become of America. If this is the direction that America chooses to go, it's over. This type of rhetoric and school of thought (on a national level) would have been laughed at, until 10 years ago..or so. If this is not absolute proof that "Critical Mass" has been exceeded...I don't know what is. |
|
|
|
Post by sdsuball on Oct 28, 2024 8:24:05 GMT -8
Will Michigan voters vote on their conscience, or along party lines?
The Arab vote, and Michigan, is very much in question for Harris:
Abdullah Hammoud, the Democratic mayor of Dearborn, Michigan — a city with one of the highest concentrations of Arab Americans — declined this week to endorse any candidate, encouraging residents instead to “vote your moral conscience.”
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Oct 28, 2024 12:11:21 GMT -8
Wow. The speakers at the Republican rally in NYC aren't even trying to hide it anymore. Having seen clips from this rally, it is just tragic what has become of America. If this is the direction that America chooses to go, it's over. This type of rhetoric and school of thought (on a national level) would have been laughed at, until 10 years ago..or so. If this is not absolute proof that "Critical Mass" has been exceeded...I don't know what is. The Democratic Machine has done it to itself. People will only take so much before they get tired of the empty promises and having Elitist talk down to them telling them what and how to do things. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Oct 28, 2024 12:29:33 GMT -8
Having seen clips from this rally, it is just tragic what has become of America. If this is the direction that America chooses to go, it's over. This type of rhetoric and school of thought (on a national level) would have been laughed at, until 10 years ago..or so. If this is not absolute proof that "Critical Mass" has been exceeded...I don't know what is. The Democratic Machine has done it to itself. People will only take so much before they get tired of the empty promises and having Elitist talk down to them telling them what and how to do things. I think you are right. Instead of scientists, the highly educated and the highly accomplished be the leaders...let's try the Jerry Springer crowd. What can go wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Oct 28, 2024 13:33:01 GMT -8
The Democratic Machine has done it to itself. People will only take so much before they get tired of the empty promises and having Elitist talk down to them telling them what and how to do things. I think you are right. Instead of scientists, the highly educated and the highly accomplished be the leaders...let's try the Jerry Springer crowd. What can go wrong? This article supports your thoughts: ground-magazine.com/05-04-2020-at-1505/ |
|
|
|
Post by bnastyaztecs on Oct 28, 2024 14:26:08 GMT -8
Proof positive this election is white supremacy versus democracy...here's the opening act for Trump's NY rally: FULL REMARKS: Comedian Tony Hinchcliffe Speaks At Trump's Rally At Madison Square Garden In NYC www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sjLNxnKKxY&ab_channel=ForbesBreakingNewsAnyone voting for Trump is either extremely ignorant, racist or bigoted...there is no other type of his voters. |
|
