|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 12:21:44 GMT -8
Obama was responsible for the most deportations of any president this century. Trump fans appear to like the idea of mass deportations. www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story%3fid=41715661There are so many inaccuracies here...I'm not sure where to start, but let's start with this. It's a fact that Trump torpedoed the border security bill. That's Republican James Lankford. James Lankford was censured by his own party in Oklahoma for working on the bill. Here's James Lankford again. Here's Republican Dan Crenshaw, saying the exact same thing: Next: It's completely dishonest to frame the argument about the first two years in the manner you did. Biden proposed the U.S. Citizenship Act on his first day in office. It was formally introduced in the House on February 18th, 2021 to fix the "Boarder." Under Senate rules, SIXTY (60) SIX ZERO votes are required for cloture to overcome a filibuster. There was never a majority that allowed Democrats to "do whatever they wanted." It was not a last minute bill, it died in committee at the end of the 117th Congress, after sitting for months. The rest of your post isn't worth addressing. Disgraceful. Too much to unpack everything in this post  The Obama immigration policies followed Clinton calling for addressing illegal crossings, I'm sure you can see how outlandish Kamala's response was with the 10 years of problems deflected towards Trump. How ironic that tightening the board with Clinton and Obama became inhumane and xenophobic under Trump? Shame on the hypocrisy. Trump was under attack from day one because the Democrats and Hillary Clinton would not concede the loss in 2016. Please elaborate on your out of left field disgraceful comment. What is that all about, Ryan? Stop being a Trump applogist. That would be helpful. I don't know what Clinton you're referring to. Bill? From 1995? That's laughable. Outlandish? No, not really. Here's what's outlandish: Republicans aren't interested in a border security bill. They just want to campaign on grievances and create illusions that Americans are in danger. It's fearmongering. Clinton (Hillary) conceded the election within hours. Another fake, delusional Trump apologist statement. And no, you know what you said. It's more made up propaganda I'm not going to dignity because you're incapable of admitting to the truth. Way to counter any of the claims I made, by the way. Hugely powerful. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 12:22:39 GMT -8
She didn't "jump into the race" - She was nominated by her party's delegates overwhelmingly and was the only logical choice given how the money allocation and DNC governing rules work. Basic, simple explanation. Nobody is comparing Trump to Hitler on a daily basis. Nobody. Quit being a victim of the propaganda machine and gather some independent thought. The two ideas aren't remotely similar, either. Trump's comparisons are perfectly valid when he's quoting Hitler speeches. Ryan, It was a Coronation of Queen Kamala by the Democratic elites. Keep in mind the Democracy of the Primary Elections where the people get to vote for their candidate did not happen with Kamala (0 votes by the people). Before you get on your high horse and preach Democracy, take some time and think about that. When you vote for a presidential ticket, you vote for the ticket, not for the individual at the top of the ticket. I don't need time, but apparently you do. Do you have anything that's original? Anything? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Oct 17, 2024 12:37:02 GMT -8
Too much to unpack everything in this post The Obama immigration policies followed Clinton calling for addressing illegal crossings, I'm sure you can see how outlandish Kamala's response was with the 10 years of problems deflected towards Trump. How ironic that tightening the board with Clinton and Obama became inhumane and xenophobic under Trump? Shame on the hypocrisy. Trump was under attack from day one because the Democrats and Hillary Clinton would not concede the loss in 2016. Please elaborate on your out of left field disgraceful comment. What is that all about, Ryan? Stop being a Trump applogist. That would be helpful. I don't know what Clinton you're referring to. Bill? From 1995? That's laughable. Outlandish? No, not really. Here's what's outlandish: Republicans aren't interested in a border security bill. They just want to campaign on grievances and create illusions that Americans are in danger. It's fearmongering. Clinton (Hillary) conceded the election within hours. Another fake, delusional Trump apologist statement. And no, you know what you said. It's more made up propaganda I'm not going to dignity because you're incapable of admitting to the truth. Way to counter any of the claims I made, by the way. Hugely powerful. Don't you think the reason the Boarder Bill was rejected was because of the Ukrainian part of the Bill? Just the Democrats miss informing the uneducated with political manipulation by blaming the Republicans. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 12:39:27 GMT -8
Stop being a Trump applogist. That would be helpful. I don't know what Clinton you're referring to. Bill? From 1995? That's laughable. Outlandish? No, not really. Here's what's outlandish: Republicans aren't interested in a border security bill. They just want to campaign on grievances and create illusions that Americans are in danger. It's fearmongering. Clinton (Hillary) conceded the election within hours. Another fake, delusional Trump apologist statement. And no, you know what you said. It's more made up propaganda I'm not going to dignity because you're incapable of admitting to the truth. Way to counter any of the claims I made, by the way. Hugely powerful. Don't you think the reason the Boarder Bill was rejected was because of the Ukrainian part of the Bill? Just the Democrats miss informing the uneducated with political manipulation by blaming the Republicans. Which Democrat in my post are you referring to? There aren't any. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Oct 17, 2024 12:40:26 GMT -8
Ryan, It was a Coronation of Queen Kamala by the Democratic elites. Keep in mind the Democracy of the Primary Elections where the people get to vote for their candidate did not happen with Kamala (0 votes by the people). Before you get on your high horse and preach Democracy, take some time and think about that. When you vote for a presidential ticket, you vote for the ticket, not for the individual at the top of the ticket. I don't need time, but apparently you do. Do you have anything that's original? Anything? I would say that bypassing the Primary Elections was pretty original on the Democratic Elite's part; along with the Non-Democratic Coronation of Kamala. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Oct 17, 2024 12:42:52 GMT -8
Don't you think the reason the Boarder Bill was rejected was because of the Ukrainian part of the Bill? Just the Democrats miss informing the uneducated with political manipulation by blaming the Republicans. Which Democrat in my post are you referring to? There aren't any. Turn on CNN, ABC, and MSNBC and you will see a pack of them. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 17, 2024 12:43:56 GMT -8
Funny, that's what they would say when Trump got the same treatment. "CNN News on display", or any other outlet not affiliated with Fox. No? You're just creating excuses that you know are false because of your political leanings. Baier tried to talk over her and dominate her...and he failed. You still haven't addressed the video clip that was edited, either. Trump bulldozed Kaitlan Collins. Bulldozed. Again, there's no real comparison to be found. Yes? It doesn't matter when, or where they interview Trump, if it's anybody but Fox, he gets the same treatment that Harris got because he evades questions, and skirts issues with the best of them. That's reality. It's nothing special what she went through. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 17, 2024 12:50:47 GMT -8
Funny, that's what they would say when Trump got the same treatment. "CNN News on display", or any other outlet not affiliated with Fox. No? You're just creating excuses that you know are false because of your political leanings. Baier tried to talk over her and dominate her...and he failed. You still haven't addressed the video clip that was edited, either. Trump bulldozed Kaitlan Collins. Bulldozed. Again, there's no real comparison to be found. I told you that I only watched the whole video. If it was edited, I'm not surprised. My comments have been only after watching the whole thing. That's your confirmation bias kicking in when you say that Baier tried to dominate her and failed. You'll WANT to see it that way. He was only trying to get her back on track and answer the question instead of deflecting to Trump. It's very obvious that she didn't want to answer the tough questions, and I don't blame her, because it wouldn't make her look very good. |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Oct 17, 2024 12:56:01 GMT -8
If the election goes as the betting odds suggest (Trump up by almost 18) this will be an embarrassment greater than the Goldwater debacle. The foolishness is 100% on the democrat party by not having an open-free convention. Chances are Hakeem Jeffries (who might be a good choice) would have gotten the nod beating the crap out of Trump.
The Fox interview was as bad as Biden’s debate performance. Brett (a democrat) was brutal and even unfair, but if she can’t handle an interview she would surely get's her butt kicked to the curb by Putin and Xi.
No one will remember Kammie in a couple of years outside of a Dan Quayle reference as the most AWFUL and ignorant VP ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 12:56:56 GMT -8
When you vote for a presidential ticket, you vote for the ticket, not for the individual at the top of the ticket. I don't need time, but apparently you do. Do you have anything that's original? Anything? I would say that bypassing the Primary Elections was pretty original on the Democratic Elite's part; along with the Non-Democratic Coronation of Kamala. They didn't bypass anything. Learn how conventions work. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 12:57:17 GMT -8
Which Democrat in my post are you referring to? There aren't any. Turn on CNN, ABC, and MSNBC and you will see a pack of them. So you're just full of garbage. Got it. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 12:59:07 GMT -8
No? You're just creating excuses that you know are false because of your political leanings. Baier tried to talk over her and dominate her...and he failed. You still haven't addressed the video clip that was edited, either. Trump bulldozed Kaitlan Collins. Bulldozed. Again, there's no real comparison to be found. I told you that I only watched the whole video. If it was edited, I'm not surprised. My comments have been only after watching the whole thing. That's your confirmation bias kicking in when you say that Baier tried to dominate her and failed. You'll WANT to see it that way. He was only trying to get her back on track and answer the question instead of deflecting to Trump. It's very obvious that she didn't want to answer the tough questions, and I don't blame her, because it wouldn't make her look very good. You watched the entire video, yet didn't see the edited clip Baier aired? I also posted it independently. You're lost. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 13:06:58 GMT -8
If the election goes as the betting odds suggest (Trump up by almost 18) this will be an embarrassment greater than the Goldwater debacle. The foolishness is 100% on the democrat party by not having an open-free convention. Chances are Hakeem Jeffries (who might be a good choice) would have gotten the nod beating the crap out of Trump. The Fox interview was as bad as Biden’s debate performance. Brett (a democrat) was brutal and even unfair, but if she can’t handle an interview she would surely get's her butt kicked to the curb by Putin and Xi. No one will remember Kammie in a couple of years outside of a Dan Quayle reference as the most AWFUL and ignorant VP ever. Baier is a Trump lackey. Nominating anyone other than Harris was never happening. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 13:24:23 GMT -8
Which Democrat in my post are you referring to? There aren't any. Turn on CNN, ABC, and MSNBC and you will see a pack of them. So you're refusing to admit Trump torpedoed the border security bill, even though multiple Republicans went on record confirming it? |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Oct 17, 2024 13:27:20 GMT -8
If the election goes as the betting odds suggest (Trump up by almost 18) this will be an embarrassment greater than the Goldwater debacle. The foolishness is 100% on the democrat party by not having an open-free convention. Chances are Hakeem Jeffries (who might be a good choice) would have gotten the nod beating the crap out of Trump. The Fox interview was as bad as Biden’s debate performance. Brett (a democrat) was brutal and even unfair, but if she can’t handle an interview she would surely get's her butt kicked to the curb by Putin and Xi. No one will remember Kammie in a couple of years outside of a Dan Quayle reference as the most AWFUL and ignorant VP ever. Baier is a Trump lackey. Nominating anyone other than Harris was never happening. Awful and ignorant? Home run.Yup, you finally looked in the mirror. Grow up. Your just a child with childless replies not worthy of any consideration. Brett is a democrat, but unwilling to wear the nose ring you find comfortable.
Your girl Kammie is toast. She even beats Dan as the worst. It isn't even sad you can't see that, it is demented, but I'd expect nothing more from a tiny closed minded thought process.
Debate!!! Do you even know what the word means?
The point you are willing to forgive and avoid, she's pathetic in a hardball interview, that should ring a bell with your replies. To repeat, so you might have a one in a million chance of an intelligent rebuttable, how's she going to deal with Putin and Xi?
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 17, 2024 13:27:23 GMT -8
I told you that I only watched the whole video. If it was edited, I'm not surprised. My comments have been only after watching the whole thing. That's your confirmation bias kicking in when you say that Baier tried to dominate her and failed. You'll WANT to see it that way. He was only trying to get her back on track and answer the question instead of deflecting to Trump. It's very obvious that she didn't want to answer the tough questions, and I don't blame her, because it wouldn't make her look very good. You watched the entire video, yet didn't see the edited clip Baier aired? I also posted it independently. You're lost. Talk about being lost. You're absolutely lost. Why would I watch a clip that's been edited when I can watch the whole thing in context. What a concept, huh? I already said that I'm not surprised that there's edited clips. They do it all the time. It's obviously not good. I wanted to judge the whole interview for what it really was. Anything wrong with that? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 13:29:05 GMT -8
Interesting parallels.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 13:35:06 GMT -8
Baier is a Trump lackey. Nominating anyone other than Harris was never happening. Awful and ignorant? Home run.Yup, you finally looked in the mirror. Grow up. Your just a child with childless replies not worthy of any consideration. Brett is a democrat, but unwilling to wear the nose ring you find comfortable. Your girl Kammie is toast. She even beats Dan as the worst. It isn't even sad you can't see that, it is demented, but I'd expect nothing more from a tiny closed minded thought process.
Debate!!! Do you even know what the word means?
The point you are willing to forgive and avoid, she's pathetic in a hardball interview, that should ring a bell with your replies. To repeat, so you might have a one in a million chance of an intelligent rebuttable, how's she going to deal with Putin and Xi?
I deleted that, that wasn't fair to you, upon reflection of the entire post. However, multiple things in your post aren't up to speed. The only person who could access the money in the campaign fund was Harris. There was never a chance to nominate anyone else, they would have started from scratch at the end of July (much later, in reality) so that's why Harris was the only logical choice. I'd like to see any kind of reputable source that labels Bret a Democrat. His actions in post-2020 election circles don't jive with that at all. He wanted to cater (and ultimately bow) to Trump's anger issues. Regarding Putin and Xi, I don't think a Fox interview is equitable to matters of foreign diplomacy. And this ignores the obvious: What Trump would do is worse. We know it's worse. We've already seen it, heard it, read it and swallowed it for years. Trump would cede Ukraine to Russia. You know it, I know it, the world knows it. Just today, he blamed Zelenskyy for starting the war. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 17, 2024 13:38:04 GMT -8
Ahhh, so he asks tough questions to everybody. Ok. As a matter of fact, I remember you praising him during this time frame. When he's tough on Harris he's just being a dick? Got it. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 17, 2024 13:42:09 GMT -8
Ahhh, so he asks tough questions to everybody. Ok. As a matter of fact, I remember you praising him during this time frame, but when he's tough on Harris he's just being a dick? Got it. We have vastly different definitions of "tough questions" and he allowed Trump to just pivot after lying throughout the entirety of that clip. |
|
