|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 28, 2023 7:32:55 GMT -8
Anonymously sourced individuals who can't be produced doesn't strike you as odd, suspicious....skeptical? When the committee flat out states "We aren't sure if the charges are accurate and we don't care".....doesn't bother you? When there is a repeated pattern of bias (Kash Patel paying people for testimony?) that isn't a problem, somehow? Yeah, I'm not the one with disinformation. I just don't understand what we're doing here. Hunter was prosecuted. It's done. Nothing will happen to POTUS. So ether the known and the seemingly non-existent whistleblowers are lying or Merrick Garland is. Funny how there is NO rush by Democrats to demand prosecution of the whistleblowers for lying to Congress (or similar legal problems). www.foxnews.com/media/nyt-confirms-irs-whistleblower-claim-hunter-biden-probe-buries-21st-paragraph-reportEven your Government approved news source confirms that Weiss's prosecutorial decisions were stymied by his upline. So his and Garland's statements that he (Weiss) had ultimate authority in bringing charges is a lie. So the question remains - Why do they lie about this? www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/white-house-hammered-hunter-biden-text-message-chinese-associateAnd the loving father throws his son under the bus implying that the smoking gun tweet by Hunter was a byproduct of his addiction. What a guy! Sure, these words are from Hunter's attorney but Joe let it stand as truth. "Any verifiable words or actions of my client, in the midst of a horrible addiction, are solely his own and have no connection to anyone in his family," While Hunter is truly a troubled guy, Joe and Garland are corrupt liars and anyone with any amount intellectual honesty can see it. The only whistleblower so far that's actually alive and speaking is Shapley. The other "anonymous" whistleblowers are fictional unless proven otherwise. Hunter Biden was prosecuted. After Biden is out of office, you can prosecute him, too, after evidence of a crime is found. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 28, 2023 12:08:10 GMT -8
The mainstream media sources are finally starting to mention the Hunter Biden Corruption story. These outlets have known about this story for at least 3 years, but have basically buried the story.
Maybe we get to see RFK Jr. flex his pecks at the Republicans.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 28, 2023 12:33:46 GMT -8
The mainstream media sources are finally starting to mention the Hunter Biden Corruption story. These outlets have known about this story for at least 3 years, but have basically buried the story. Maybe we get to see RFK Jr. flex his pecks at the Republicans. Nobody has buried the story. www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1245533NBC in the fall of 2020. New York Times in the fall of 2020. www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/us/politics/hunter-biden-laptop.htmlNews agencies don't run with stories (often) unless they are credibly sourced. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 28, 2023 16:27:14 GMT -8
The mainstream media sources are finally starting to mention the Hunter Biden Corruption story. These outlets have known about this story for at least 3 years, but have basically buried the story. Maybe we get to see RFK Jr. flex his pecks at the Republicans. Nobody has buried the story. www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1245533NBC in the fall of 2020. New York Times in the fall of 2020. www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/us/politics/hunter-biden-laptop.htmlNews agencies don't run with stories (often) unless they are credibly sourced. Oh pleeeeze. When Trump was accused of pretty much anything by the mainstreamers it was a ubiquitous non stop Impeach-a-thon, sources didn’t matter then. The “Russiagate” thing was their lede for almost two years, non stop bashing with accusations which have been proven false. My goodness you have a selective memory, and please, enough with the paywalls. The last thing I’m going to do is subscribe to that propaganda. The other article laughably says they tried to run additional stories but were shut down, proving Biden’s disregard to the Bill of Rights aka Freedom of the press. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 28, 2023 18:30:29 GMT -8
Oh pleeeeze. When Trump was accused of pretty much anything by the mainstreamers it was a ubiquitous non stop Impeach-a-thon, sources didn’t matter then. The “Russiagate” thing was their lede for almost two years, non stop bashing with accusations which have been proven false. My goodness you have a selective memory, and please, enough with the paywalls. The last thing I’m going to do is subscribe to that propaganda. The other article laughably says they tried to run additional stories but were shut down, proving Biden’s disregard to the Bill of Rights aka Freedom of the press. I'm not asking you to subscribe to anything. Firefox - Reader Mode. Done. Exactly what was disproven? Pretty sure you know that is erroneous. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 28, 2023 20:59:22 GMT -8
Oh pleeeeze. When Trump was accused of pretty much anything by the mainstreamers it was a ubiquitous non stop Impeach-a-thon, sources didn’t matter then. The “Russiagate” thing was their lede for almost two years, non stop bashing with accusations which have been proven false. My goodness you have a selective memory, and please, enough with the paywalls. The last thing I’m going to do is subscribe to that propaganda. The other article laughably says they tried to run additional stories but were shut down, proving Biden’s disregard to the Bill of Rights aka Freedom of the press. I'm not asking you to subscribe to anything. Firefox - Reader Mode. Done. Exactly what was disproven? Pretty sure you know that is erroneous. Two years and they didn’t achieve their political objectives…..because there was nothing there. Back to topic. As I correctly predicted, this story is gaining traction. The Dems may want to look another direction and it probably won’t be the despised VP. Look for Hobo Newsome vs Mouse DeSantis 2024. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 28, 2023 21:13:00 GMT -8
I'm not asking you to subscribe to anything. Firefox - Reader Mode. Done. Exactly what was disproven? Pretty sure you know that is erroneous. Two years and they didn’t achieve their political objectives…..because there was nothing there. Back to topic. As I correctly predicted, this story is gaining traction. The Dems may want to look another direction and it probably won’t be the despised VP. Look for Hobo Newsome vs Mouse DeSantis 2024. Can you answer the question instead of dodging it like always? What was disproven? I'm guessing you can't or won't because you know the truth is opposite of your reality. Biden will be the nominee and he'll win. Pretty simple. The story is gaining traction in your Republican damaged brain, maybe? You called the NYT "propaganda" but here we are trotting out the Washington Examiner like it's gospel. Lol. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 28, 2023 22:02:14 GMT -8
Two years and they didn’t achieve their political objectives…..because there was nothing there. Back to topic. As I correctly predicted, this story is gaining traction. The Dems may want to look another direction and it probably won’t be the despised VP. Look for Hobo Newsome vs Mouse DeSantis 2024. Can you answer the question instead of dodging it like always? What was disproven? I'm guessing you can't or won't because you know the truth is opposite of your reality. Biden will be the nominee and he'll win. Pretty simple. The story is gaining traction in your Republican damaged brain, maybe? You called the NYT "propaganda" but here we are trotting out the Washington Examiner like it's gospel. Lol. If there was something, they would have accomplished their objectives. If Biden’s name becomes toxic and the polls dip, the Democratic Party will kick him to the curb. It’s all about winning and maintaining power for them. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 28, 2023 22:45:34 GMT -8
Can you answer the question instead of dodging it like always? What was disproven? I'm guessing you can't or won't because you know the truth is opposite of your reality. Biden will be the nominee and he'll win. Pretty simple. The story is gaining traction in your Republican damaged brain, maybe? You called the NYT "propaganda" but here we are trotting out the Washington Examiner like it's gospel. Lol. If there was something, they would have accomplished their objectives. If Biden’s name becomes toxic and the polls dip, the Democratic Party will kick him to the curb. It’s all about winning and maintaining power for them. So, no, you can't answer a basic question. Instead, you'll talk in conspiratorial generalities that mean nothing, largely. Objectives? This isn't a spy mission, it's just a simple question. And no, they will not. Biden will be the nominee. You need to lay off the toxic shrooms. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 29, 2023 3:11:11 GMT -8
If there was something, they would have accomplished their objectives. If Biden’s name becomes toxic and the polls dip, the Democratic Party will kick him to the curb. It’s all about winning and maintaining power for them. So, no, you can't answer a basic question. Instead, you'll talk in conspiratorial generalities that mean nothing, largely. Objectives? This isn't a spy mission, it's just a simple question. And no, they will not. Biden will be the nominee. You need to lay off the toxic shrooms. Sigh…..someone please…..just give this guy a like. I’m under no obligation to answer your questions. You just spout the same talking points I hear from Maddow, Van and The View. Liberal rubbish which you probably cut and paste from some site. “exactly what was disproven?” Is that the one you want? I’ve already answered this question on other threads, go look there…..the answer rhymes with Hillary btw. The point of this is (as I predicted) the Biden’s influence peddling to Russia and China has now become a national story covered by everyone. The Democrat Party can’t hide this anymore and the mainstream media has begun to turn on it’s preferred candidate. BTW, Biden got confused today and mixed up Iraq with Ukraine. ON NATIONAL TV!!!! No way this Chauncey Gardener stunt double is in charge. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 29, 2023 7:37:15 GMT -8
So, no, you can't answer a basic question. Instead, you'll talk in conspiratorial generalities that mean nothing, largely. Objectives? This isn't a spy mission, it's just a simple question. And no, they will not. Biden will be the nominee. You need to lay off the toxic shrooms. Sigh…..someone please…..just give this guy a like. I’m under no obligation to answer your questions. You just spout the same talking points I hear from Maddow, Van and The View. Liberal rubbish which you probably cut and paste from some site. “exactly what was disproven?” Is that the one you want? I’ve already answered this question on other threads, go look there…..the answer rhymes with Hillary btw. The point of this is (as I predicted) the Biden’s influence peddling to Russia and China has now become a national story covered by everyone. The Democrat Party can’t hide this anymore and the mainstream media has begun to turn on it’s preferred candidate. BTW, Biden got confused today and mixed up Iraq with Ukraine. ON NATIONAL TV!!!! No way this Chauncey Gardener stunt double is in charge. If I cared about clout, you'd know it. I've said it to similarly-toned minions, I couldn't care less. Not here to be popular, not here to exchange high fives, especially from folks who want to blame the world for obviously illogically-framed hatred clouded in myth. You call it liberal rubbish, I call it an attempt at truth. I don't watch Maddow or Whoopi or largely anything else. I call your attempts at deflection a weak attempt at avoidance, but I think you're smarter than that. I think you know you've been duped, but you keep pounding the pavement in an anti-Democrat hellscape. Let's get down to brass tacks so you can stop repeating your own regurgitated Infowars water cooler thoughts. Fact 1: A GOP-led Senate panel concluded "Russiagate" was very, very real. www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-electionFact 2: That reality included Paul Manafort going to jail. Manafort sold internal polling data to Russian intelligence operatives with the express purpose of damaging the Clinton campaign. apnews.com/article/donald-trump-paul-manafort-russia-campaigns-konstantin-kilimnik-d2fdefdb37077e28eba135e21fce6ebfFact 3: The Durham Report, which you claimed repeatedly "exonerated Trump" did no such thing. In fact, it resulted in one actual prosecution of....anyone, while falling apart under scrutiny amid Durham's feeble attempts to come across as authoritative. www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/durham-report-no-exoneration-trumps-actions-when-it-comes-russia-opinion-1800719%3famp=1Fact 4: Bill Barr personally killed the Mueller Report, which found and concluded numerous ties and obstruction between the Trump campaign and Russia. Durham was appointed specifically to protect Trump, in Barr's own words. Fact 5: Hillary was investigated not once, not twice, not three times, but four times, including twice under Trump's presidential term by his DOJ. No charges were ever filed at any point. There are reasons for that and several major differences from the current ongoing case against Trump. apnews.com/article/trump-indictment-clinton-classified-documents-republican-claims-7681bc9807ecd8bc37fd3f39b9756cc7Like I've said all along: If there's actual evidence Joe Biden committed a crime, even one as trivial as a bribe when he was VP (Influence peddling for such a small amount of money is pretty low on the totem pole)....prosecute him, after he leaves office. DOJ standing policy maintains you can't prosecute a sitting president. Hunter was investigated for years and eventually charged. I know it's not the death sentence Republicans wanted, but it happened. When you take a step back and ignore the "R" and the "D" and just look at the *severity* of the act committed, there's no comparison here. Jared Kushner likely took a two billion dollar blood money deal from the Saudi kingdom for the acceptance of the murder of an American journalist. That seems pretty bad, right? Now you have a former president credibly accused and admitting that he kept classified material on foreign allies, human intelligence, nuclear weapons, terrorist attack vulnerabilities and highly sensitive satellite imagery. That seems very bad, given the nature of that person, doesn't it? I don't expect to find common ground here, but I'm not interested in just blatant attempts at deflection spin when I watched January 6 with my own eyes, after reading testimony and statements, after watching hours of video. I believe them when they tell me who they are. On the record, with their statements, promoting fraudulent myths in an attempt to subvert democracy. You should, too. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Jun 29, 2023 7:55:27 GMT -8
The only whistleblower so far that's actually alive and speaking is Shapley. The other "anonymous" whistleblowers are fictional unless proven otherwise. Hunter Biden was prosecuted. After Biden is out of office, you can prosecute him, too, after evidence of a crime is found. Besides the bribery that Joe participated in, the issue is the corruption of the Executive branch for the sake of the employees' Democrat leanings. It it now clear that the Feds blocked the Hunter investigation as it naturally led to Joe. Other BS like delays in prosecution to allow the statute of limitations to play into the more significant crimes of Hunter (and Joe). www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-irs-whistleblower-blasts-blocking-documented-leads-big-guyThe denials to allow the Delaware DA to file charges in DC or CA is another case of Feds protecting Dems. Garland should have made that happen but was awol. With a corrupt FBI and DoJ, there will be no prosecuting of Joe ever. We are Banana Republic as the left celebrates it. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jun 29, 2023 7:56:18 GMT -8
Sigh…..someone please…..just give this guy a like. I’m under no obligation to answer your questions. You just spout the same talking points I hear from Maddow, Van and The View. Liberal rubbish which you probably cut and paste from some site. “exactly what was disproven?” Is that the one you want? I’ve already answered this question on other threads, go look there…..the answer rhymes with Hillary btw. The point of this is (as I predicted) the Biden’s influence peddling to Russia and China has now become a national story covered by everyone. The Democrat Party can’t hide this anymore and the mainstream media has begun to turn on it’s preferred candidate. BTW, Biden got confused today and mixed up Iraq with Ukraine. ON NATIONAL TV!!!! No way this Chauncey Gardener stunt double is in charge. If I cared about clout, you'd know it. I've said it to similarly-toned minions, I couldn't care less. Not here to be popular, not here to exchange high fives, especially from folks who want to blame the world for obviously illogically-framed hatred clouded in myth. You call it liberal rubbish, I call it an attempt at truth. I don't watch Maddow or Whoopi or largely anything else. I call your attempts at deflection a weak attempt at avoidance, but I think you're smarter than that. I think you know you've been duped, but you keep pounding the pavement in an anti-Democrat hellscape. Let's get down to brass tacks so you can stop repeating your own regurgitated Infowars water cooler thoughts. Fact 1: A GOP-led Senate panel concluded "Russiagate" was very, very real. www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-electionFact 2: That reality included Paul Manafort going to jail. Manafort sold internal polling data to Russian intelligence operatives with the express purpose of damaging the Clinton campaign. apnews.com/article/donald-trump-paul-manafort-russia-campaigns-konstantin-kilimnik-d2fdefdb37077e28eba135e21fce6ebfFact 3: The Durham Report, which you claimed repeatedly "exonerated Trump" did no such thing. In fact, it resulted in one actual prosecution of....anyone, while falling apart under scrutiny amid Durham's feeble attempts to come across as authoritative. www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/durham-report-no-exoneration-trumps-actions-when-it-comes-russia-opinion-1800719%3famp=1Fact 4: Bill Barr personally killed the Mueller Report, which found and concluded numerous ties and obstruction between the Trump campaign and Russia. Durham was appointed specifically to protect Trump, in Barr's own words. Fact 5: Hillary was investigated not once, not twice, not three times, but four times, including twice under Trump's presidential term by his DOJ. No charges were ever filed at any point. There are reasons for that and several major differences from the current ongoing case against Trump. apnews.com/article/trump-indictment-clinton-classified-documents-republican-claims-7681bc9807ecd8bc37fd3f39b9756cc7Like I've said all along: If there's actual evidence Joe Biden committed a crime, even one as trivial as a bribe when he was VP (Influence peddling for such a small amount of money is pretty low on the totem pole)....prosecute him, after he leaves office. DOJ standing policy maintains you can't prosecute a sitting president. Hunter was investigated for years and eventually charged. I know it's not the death sentence Republicans wanted, but it happened. When you take a step back and ignore the "R" and the "D" and just look at the *severity* of the act committed, there's no comparison here. Jared Kushner likely took a two billion dollar blood money deal from the Saudi kingdom for the acceptance of the murder of an American journalist. That seems pretty bad, right? Now you have a former president credibly accused and admitting that he kept classified material on foreign allies, human intelligence, nuclear weapons, terrorist attack vulnerabilities and highly sensitive satellite imagery. That seems very bad, given the nature of that person, doesn't it? I don't expect to find common ground here, but I'm not interested in just blatant attempts at deflection spin when I watched January 6 with my own eyes, after reading testimony and statements, after watching hours of video. I believe them when they tell me who they are. On the record, with their statements, promoting fraudulent myths in an attempt to subvert democracy. You should, too. Because it took so long to finally charge Hunter with something, that shows that Hillary and Joe may not be as innocent as some say. It just may take more attempts and it being done in the right way. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 29, 2023 8:57:06 GMT -8
The only whistleblower so far that's actually alive and speaking is Shapley. The other "anonymous" whistleblowers are fictional unless proven otherwise. Hunter Biden was prosecuted. After Biden is out of office, you can prosecute him, too, after evidence of a crime is found. Besides the bribery that Joe participated in, the issue is the corruption of the Executive branch for the sake of the employees' Democrat leanings. It it now clear that the Feds blocked the Hunter investigation as it naturally led to Joe. Other BS like delays in prosecution to allow the statute of limitations to play into the more significant crimes of Hunter (and Joe). www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-irs-whistleblower-blasts-blocking-documented-leads-big-guyThe denials to allow the Delaware DA to file charges in DC or CA is another case of Feds protecting Dems. Garland should have made that happen but was awol. With a corrupt FBI and DoJ, there will be no prosecuting of Joe ever. We are Banana Republic as the left celebrates it. It's not clear at all.... and corruption didn't start yesterday. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 29, 2023 8:58:36 GMT -8
If I cared about clout, you'd know it. I've said it to similarly-toned minions, I couldn't care less. Not here to be popular, not here to exchange high fives, especially from folks who want to blame the world for obviously illogically-framed hatred clouded in myth. You call it liberal rubbish, I call it an attempt at truth. I don't watch Maddow or Whoopi or largely anything else. I call your attempts at deflection a weak attempt at avoidance, but I think you're smarter than that. I think you know you've been duped, but you keep pounding the pavement in an anti-Democrat hellscape. Let's get down to brass tacks so you can stop repeating your own regurgitated Infowars water cooler thoughts. Fact 1: A GOP-led Senate panel concluded "Russiagate" was very, very real. www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-electionFact 2: That reality included Paul Manafort going to jail. Manafort sold internal polling data to Russian intelligence operatives with the express purpose of damaging the Clinton campaign. apnews.com/article/donald-trump-paul-manafort-russia-campaigns-konstantin-kilimnik-d2fdefdb37077e28eba135e21fce6ebfFact 3: The Durham Report, which you claimed repeatedly "exonerated Trump" did no such thing. In fact, it resulted in one actual prosecution of....anyone, while falling apart under scrutiny amid Durham's feeble attempts to come across as authoritative. www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/durham-report-no-exoneration-trumps-actions-when-it-comes-russia-opinion-1800719%3famp=1Fact 4: Bill Barr personally killed the Mueller Report, which found and concluded numerous ties and obstruction between the Trump campaign and Russia. Durham was appointed specifically to protect Trump, in Barr's own words. Fact 5: Hillary was investigated not once, not twice, not three times, but four times, including twice under Trump's presidential term by his DOJ. No charges were ever filed at any point. There are reasons for that and several major differences from the current ongoing case against Trump. apnews.com/article/trump-indictment-clinton-classified-documents-republican-claims-7681bc9807ecd8bc37fd3f39b9756cc7Like I've said all along: If there's actual evidence Joe Biden committed a crime, even one as trivial as a bribe when he was VP (Influence peddling for such a small amount of money is pretty low on the totem pole)....prosecute him, after he leaves office. DOJ standing policy maintains you can't prosecute a sitting president. Hunter was investigated for years and eventually charged. I know it's not the death sentence Republicans wanted, but it happened. When you take a step back and ignore the "R" and the "D" and just look at the *severity* of the act committed, there's no comparison here. Jared Kushner likely took a two billion dollar blood money deal from the Saudi kingdom for the acceptance of the murder of an American journalist. That seems pretty bad, right? Now you have a former president credibly accused and admitting that he kept classified material on foreign allies, human intelligence, nuclear weapons, terrorist attack vulnerabilities and highly sensitive satellite imagery. That seems very bad, given the nature of that person, doesn't it? I don't expect to find common ground here, but I'm not interested in just blatant attempts at deflection spin when I watched January 6 with my own eyes, after reading testimony and statements, after watching hours of video. I believe them when they tell me who they are. On the record, with their statements, promoting fraudulent myths in an attempt to subvert democracy. You should, too. Because it took so long to finally charge Hunter with something, that shows that Hillary and Joe may not be as innocent as some say. It just may take more attempts and it being done in the right way. ....What? "The right way"? It took so long because Trump's DOJ couldn't find anything prosecutable that would stick. They had the investigation as far back as 2018. Crimes require evidence, you know? Man... |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jun 29, 2023 9:39:20 GMT -8
Because it took so long to finally charge Hunter with something, that shows that Hillary and Joe may not be as innocent as some say. It just may take more attempts and it being done in the right way. ....What? "The right way"? It took so long because Trump's DOJ couldn't find anything prosecutable that would stick. They had the investigation as far back as 2018. Crimes require evidence, you know? Man... An honest investigation. Man... |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 29, 2023 9:52:14 GMT -8
....What? "The right way"? It took so long because Trump's DOJ couldn't find anything prosecutable that would stick. They had the investigation as far back as 2018. Crimes require evidence, you know? Man... An honest investigation. Man... Makes zero sense. So neither DOJ entity ran an honest investigation, spanning multiple attorney generals? Seems unlikely. Crimes require evidence, not tainted by chain of custody issues or other improprieties. Maybe we should just investigate everyone without a real basis for doing so. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jun 29, 2023 10:24:39 GMT -8
An honest investigation. Man... Makes zero sense. So neither DOJ entity ran an honest investigation, spanning multiple attorney generals? Seems unlikely. Crimes require evidence, not tainted by chain of custody issues or other improprieties. Maybe we should just investigate everyone without a real basis for doing so. So, Hunter wasn't given preferential treatment? I highly doubt that. |
|
|
|
Post by azson on Jun 29, 2023 10:34:34 GMT -8
So, no, you can't answer a basic question. Instead, you'll talk in conspiratorial generalities that mean nothing, largely. Objectives? This isn't a spy mission, it's just a simple question. And no, they will not. Biden will be the nominee. You need to lay off the toxic shrooms. Sigh…..someone please…..just give this guy a like.I’m under no obligation to answer your questions. You just spout the same talking points I hear from Maddow, Van and The View. Liberal rubbish which you probably cut and paste from some site. “exactly what was disproven?” Is that the one you want? I’ve already answered this question on other threads, go look there…..the answer rhymes with Hillary btw. The point of this is (as I predicted) the Biden’s influence peddling to Russia and China has now become a national story covered by everyone. The Democrat Party can’t hide this anymore and the mainstream media has begun to turn on it’s preferred candidate. BTW, Biden got confused today and mixed up Iraq with Ukraine. ON NATIONAL TV!!!! No way this Chauncey Gardener stunt double is in charge. Done. And Ryan's right, you need to lay off the Ft OXic shrooms. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 29, 2023 10:35:26 GMT -8
Makes zero sense. So neither DOJ entity ran an honest investigation, spanning multiple attorney generals? Seems unlikely. Crimes require evidence, not tainted by chain of custody issues or other improprieties. Maybe we should just investigate everyone without a real basis for doing so. So, Hunter wasn't given preferential treatment? I highly doubt that. By Trump's DOJ, who investigated the case for two and a half years prior to it being public? *I* highly doubt that. You argued in the past that privilege wasn't a real social concept. Now it is? Interesting. |
|
