|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 31, 2023 12:08:31 GMT -8
Yeah, he's a conspiracy theorist at times, with a warped view on some issues. At the same time, you're an Internet bully at times, who goes waaay overboard like no other. So, there's that. It's never a good look when you attack with name calling over an alien conspiracy theory, etc.... |
|
|
|
Thank you
May 31, 2023 12:15:33 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by aztecryan on May 31, 2023 12:15:33 GMT -8
I can't stop laughing. What a bizarre and warped view. It doesn't matter what thread it is.....because they are all the same perspective, duh. We call these things "patterns." But yes, talking about baseball is the same thing as anti-vax conspiracy theories and government-induced false flag hoaxes when kids were nearly decapitated in their classroom. Are you...serious? And who are you to pass judgment on anyone? Worry about your own habits. By the way, I've never advocated for anyone to be banned for "name calling"....ever. Good job conflating that with obvious trolling and the reckless spreading of conspiracy theories. Some things don't belong here. Shouldn't be controversial? I asked you point blank if you liked dead children. You didn't have a clue about the OP's posting history on that front. You didn't even bother to strongly condemn that narrative. You barely offered a passing "I don't always agree" token response. So, yeah, I'm 100% with standing up against that. Maybe police your own conscience first before you start worrying about "warning levels." Here's your "Duh" moment. Of course I'm not talking about sports threads, but about political subjects, or whether there's Aliens or not, or conspiracies. Some are harmless, but you choose to attack, even in THOSE moments. That's what's bizarre and hateful. I can understand someone being upset if another believes those children weren't killed at Sandy Hook, but you're relentless, with anger issues. Again, like I said, I need to work on that as well, but do you notice that you're the only one who has that type of anger towards him, and others for that matter? Like you tell others, get help. I see you still have reading comprehension issues, or you only have a one track mind (I'm sure both) and want to think the worst, but when you asked me if I like dead children, I said of course not. Sheesh. I don't hold the same view as him on the Sandy Hook situation and I think it's ridiculous, but I'm not going to bash someone the way you are, and viciously name calling, etc, in every post he makes. But, you be you. Please provide some proof of your assertion. (Don't bother, you don't have any.) Again, who are you to decide what is harmless to someone else? That's what you're missing. It's not about you. Never was. Relentless? With anger issues? I'll log off and not be affected in the next five minutes. Doesn't affect me whatsoever. I won't be thinking about "aztecnails" tonight, I can assure you. Like I said, silence makes you just as bad. My conscience is clear and you thinking name calling is somehow more egregious than perpetuating dead children as crisis actors is completely on brand. All you're missing in the bio is an American flag and the scripture. Just not interested in this debate. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Thank you
May 31, 2023 12:41:58 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by johneaztec on May 31, 2023 12:41:58 GMT -8
Here's your "Duh" moment. Of course I'm not talking about sports threads, but about political subjects, or whether there's Aliens or not, or conspiracies. Some are harmless, but you choose to attack, even in THOSE moments. That's what's bizarre and hateful. I can understand someone being upset if another believes those children weren't killed at Sandy Hook, but you're relentless, with anger issues. Again, like I said, I need to work on that as well, but do you notice that you're the only one who has that type of anger towards him, and others for that matter? Like you tell others, get help. I see you still have reading comprehension issues, or you only have a one track mind (I'm sure both) and want to think the worst, but when you asked me if I like dead children, I said of course not. Sheesh. I don't hold the same view as him on the Sandy Hook situation and I think it's ridiculous, but I'm not going to bash someone the way you are, and viciously name calling, etc, in every post he makes. But, you be you. Please provide some proof of your assertion. (Don't bother, you don't have any.) Again, who are you to decide what is harmless to someone else? That's what you're missing. It's not about you. Never was. Relentless? With anger issues? I'll log off and not be affected in the next five minutes. Doesn't affect me whatsoever. I won't be thinking about "aztecnails" tonight, I can assure you. Like I said, silence makes you just as bad. My conscience is clear and you thinking name calling is somehow more egregious than perpetuating dead children as crisis actors is completely on brand. All you're missing in the bio is an American flag and the scripture. Just not interested in this debate. Sorry. I hear ya Ryan. All's good. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 31, 2023 12:53:25 GMT -8
Please provide some proof of your assertion. (Don't bother, you don't have any.) Again, who are you to decide what is harmless to someone else? That's what you're missing. It's not about you. Never was. Relentless? With anger issues? I'll log off and not be affected in the next five minutes. Doesn't affect me whatsoever. I won't be thinking about "aztecnails" tonight, I can assure you. Like I said, silence makes you just as bad. My conscience is clear and you thinking name calling is somehow more egregious than perpetuating dead children as crisis actors is completely on brand. All you're missing in the bio is an American flag and the scripture. Just not interested in this debate. Sorry. I hear ya Ryan. All's good. Go Padres.  |
|
|
|
Thank you
May 31, 2023 12:54:51 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by johneaztec on May 31, 2023 12:54:51 GMT -8
I hear ya Ryan. All's good. Go Padres. Funny. That's exactly what I thought I should have said on my last post. Yep, go Pads!!! |
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on Jun 1, 2023 1:58:18 GMT -8
A peer-reviewed study by Open Forum Infectious Diseases said "the association of increased risk of Covid-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccines doses was unexpected. Translating those who got more doses were more likely to be at higher risk (of getting covid). Media coverage at the time called these breakthrough cases in 2021.
|
|
|
|
Thank you
Jun 1, 2023 6:55:00 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by aztecryan on Jun 1, 2023 6:55:00 GMT -8
A peer-reviewed study by Open Forum Infectious Diseases said "the association of increased risk of Covid-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccines doses was unexpected. Translating those who got more doses were more likely to be at higher risk (of getting covid). Media coverage at the time called these breakthrough cases in 2021. The vaccine saved millions and millions of lives around the world. That's an actual fact. You're not going to change, so you'll shout into the wind in isolation. Enjoy. |
|
