|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 18, 2023 10:01:20 GMT -8
By Marjorie Taylor Greene.
For the second time.
|
|
|
|
Post by azson on May 18, 2023 10:14:22 GMT -8
By Marjorie Taylor Greene. For the second time.  |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on May 20, 2023 16:07:43 GMT -8
By Marjorie Taylor Greene. For the second time. How about just coming up with decent candidate to defeat Biden in 2024? I mean, that's the way it usually works. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on May 20, 2023 16:24:45 GMT -8
She appears 2x in the Idiocracy Movie...and at least once in Mars Attacks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on May 21, 2023 17:54:33 GMT -8
By Marjorie Taylor Greene. For the second time. This great piece of legislating from the congresswoman that didn't know that Ukraine was in Europe. Ugh! Maybe she'll see the light, quit and open a 24 hour fitness and stupidity center with Gym Jordan. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on May 23, 2023 23:53:32 GMT -8
Sadly, every President will probably be impeached from here on. The Democrats lowered the bar and here are the consequences.
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on May 24, 2023 3:53:30 GMT -8
Sadly, every President will probably be impeached from here on. The Democrats lowered the bar and here are the consequences. Geez, and you say this with a straight (digital) face? "Lowered the bar"? Are you f****** serious? No one in the history of America has lowered the bar like trump. This is what you don't get. In the 60's, if trump had believed putin over our own intelligence agencies, in front of cameras and the world to see, he wouldn't have been impeached. He would have been "Rosenberg'ed". |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 24, 2023 7:32:46 GMT -8
Sadly, every President will probably be impeached from here on. The Democrats lowered the bar and here are the consequences. Nope. Learn how impeachment actually works. Anyone can actually file a HR (House Resolution) to draft articles of impeachment. The *Republicans* have made a mockery out of the process, having done it on Biden's first day in office as petty revenge. It takes an actual VOTE to advance it. It means nothing in its current stage. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on May 24, 2023 12:11:48 GMT -8
biden deserves impeachment for blocking the fbi from releasing the fd-1023 report that proves biden is guilty of financial crimes. Congress subpoenaed that report and the fbi obstructs. Innocent people say release the report because it will exonerate them.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 24, 2023 12:18:26 GMT -8
biden deserves impeachment for blocking the fbi from releasing the fd-1023 report that proves biden is guilty of financial crimes. Congress subpoenaed that report and the fbi obstructs. Innocent people say release the report because it will exonerate them. It doesn't "prove" anything. Since I'm 10000000000% sure you've never seen the actual document, you should probably sit this one out. It's an ongoing investigation, which means it's inappropriate for "Congress" to do anything. We have separation of powers for a reason. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on May 24, 2023 17:44:46 GMT -8
A Congress committee requested that document. It is obstruction to not turn it over.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 24, 2023 18:06:31 GMT -8
A Congress committee requested that document. It is obstruction to not turn it over. It is absolutely not obstruction. Lol. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 24, 2023 20:58:02 GMT -8
A Congress committee requested that document. It is obstruction to not turn it over. You'd have to be either deranged or really indoctrinated to believe this is actually real. Listen to Comer stammer and lie his way through this interview. It's completely fabricated nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on May 25, 2023 10:31:08 GMT -8
The Steele dossier was fake and paid for by hilary clinton. That fake document requires clinton and the dnc to pay a $113.000 fine from the Federal Election Commission on campaign finance violations for misrepresentations of spending. The guardian article mentioned $8,000 for clinton and $105,000 for the dnc. biden is a criminal who deserves legal justice.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 25, 2023 10:47:03 GMT -8
The Steele dossier was fake and paid for by hilary clinton. That fake document requires clinton and the dnc to pay a $113.000 fine from the Federal Election Commission on campaign finance violations for misrepresentations of spending. The guardian article mentioned $8,000 for clinton and $105,000 for the dnc. biden is a criminal who deserves legal justice. And you have no proof. Case closed. The Steele Dossier wasn't "fake" by the way. Many parts of it were corroborated by the DNI. If you have to try this hard to dispel commonly known and accepted beliefs....maybe you're on the wrong side? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on May 26, 2023 12:00:21 GMT -8
The mueller report found no evidence of Trump-Russa collusion. The Durham report confirmed the no evidence. Sad day in America when there is two-tiered justice system where dems get a pass but republicans are investigated and convicted by biased jurors like in the dem michael sussmann trial.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 26, 2023 12:20:07 GMT -8
The mueller report found no evidence of Trump-Russa collusion. The Durham report confirmed the no evidence. Sad day in America when there is two-tiered justice system where dems get a pass but republicans are investigated and convicted by biased jurors like in the dem michael sussmann trial. Jesus...H....Christ. It's like you're a brainwashed robot, spitting out the greatest hits. Let's place this (and your arguments in general) in a blender. The Mueller Report didn't find *collusion* because *collusion* is not a legal term. It has no bearing on a criminal investigation. Mueller was not looking for collusion. From Mueller himself: “We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.” Secondly, the Durham Report does not confirm anything. Durham's investigation yielded nothing, despite being appointed by a partisan AG for the express purpose of protecting Donald Trump. Now he's refusing to testify in front of a committee. Hm, wonder why? The only thing that's sad is your repeated and futile attempts at falsely characterizing easily accessible and verifiable information. You're not bringing anything new. You're just regurgitating myths that have been debunked for years. Example: The Mueller Report *exonerated* Trump. The Mueller Report found no evidence of _____. The Mueller Report found numerous instances of obstruction and ties to Russia and the Trump campaign. People went to prison, dude. The only thing that saved Trump was the standing policy that a sitting president could not be indicted and the fact Barr obstructed the investigation and killed the investigation personally. Facts are facts. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 22, 2023 0:22:14 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jun 22, 2023 5:23:59 GMT -8
Guess she got her GED just before winning congressional seat. In other words, barely graduated from high school in time. America used to have higher standards. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 22, 2023 7:19:41 GMT -8
Correct. This is at least the third or fourth time she's filed them without any real support for the measure. Noteworthy that Boebert voted against increased border funding at least twice. |
|
