|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 23, 2023 21:57:42 GMT -8
Original enslavers? What year is it? He's talking about Democrats being enslavers...but during the early 60's Freedom Marches participants did not include right wingers. The 60's music explosion and associated new societal freedoms..including young whites and African Americans mingling for social and music events was driven by the Left ...which the right wing Musician will never get over. I'm sure he's been an anomaly in the music buis. over the years. It was ten generations ago although, it gives perspective to remember who did what. 13th Amendment - Abolished slavery. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 23% of the Democrats. 15th Amendment - Right to vote for all. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats.. 14th Amendment - Citizenship for freed slaves. Supported by 94% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats. That’s quite a legacy Dems, that’s what I was referring to. The Civil Rights act of 1964 would have never been passed without Republican support. Too many racist (KKK) Democrats didn’t support the bill and the GOP (the party who fought against and freed the slaves) carried the bill across the finish line in a bipartisan manner. Please don’t pretend the party of Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnston has a monopoly on the moral high ground of our country’s history. It’s actually the opposite.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Apr 24, 2023 5:31:07 GMT -8
He's talking about Democrats being enslavers...but during the early 60's Freedom Marches participants did not include right wingers. The 60's music explosion and associated new societal freedoms..including young whites and African Americans mingling for social and music events was driven by the Left ...which the right wing Musician will never get over. I'm sure he's been an anomaly in the music buis. over the years. It was ten generations ago although, it gives perspective to remember who did what. 13th Amendment - Abolished slavery. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 23% of the Democrats. 15th Amendment - Right to vote for all. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats.. 14th Amendment - Citizenship for freed slaves. Supported by 94% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats. That’s quite a legacy Dems, that’s what I was referring to. The Civil Rights act of 1964 would have never been passed without Republican support. Too many racist (KKK) Democrats didn’t support the bill and the GOP (the party who fought against and freed the slaves) carried the bill across the finish line in a bipartisan manner. Please don’t pretend the party of Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnston has a monopoly on the moral high ground of our country’s history. It’s actually the opposite. Well, we could go back to the horse and buggy.. but in today's world the KKK votes one way. Just go ask David Duke. I won't go through the hundreds of examples happening today, but you are on the wrong side of history.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 24, 2023 7:19:39 GMT -8
He's talking about Democrats being enslavers...but during the early 60's Freedom Marches participants did not include right wingers. The 60's music explosion and associated new societal freedoms..including young whites and African Americans mingling for social and music events was driven by the Left ...which the right wing Musician will never get over. I'm sure he's been an anomaly in the music buis. over the years. It was ten generations ago although, it gives perspective to remember who did what. 13th Amendment - Abolished slavery. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 23% of the Democrats. 15th Amendment - Right to vote for all. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats.. 14th Amendment - Citizenship for freed slaves. Supported by 94% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats. That’s quite a legacy Dems, that’s what I was referring to. The Civil Rights act of 1964 would have never been passed without Republican support. Too many racist (KKK) Democrats didn’t support the bill and the GOP (the party who fought against and freed the slaves) carried the bill across the finish line in a bipartisan manner. Please don’t pretend the party of Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnston has a monopoly on the moral high ground of our country’s history. It’s actually the opposite. This is quite the bogus narrative. Political ideologies shift over the course of 200 years. There are a half dozen factions inside the modern-day Republican Party, at a minimum. Members of every political party owned slaves. Henry Clay spoke out against slavery, yet he himself owned 60 slaves. Please don't pretend that Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnson have political relevancy in 2023. Multiple different iterations of political parties have come and gone since then, with policy and philosophy radically changing over time. Post-1964, ideologically speaking, the modern parties have flipped.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Apr 25, 2023 12:43:48 GMT -8
If Biden and the Democrats cared anything about Human Trafficking and all the related humanitarian crimes occurring over our borders, they would happily change immigration law with the GOP to stop the on going fraud, rapes, exploitation, Cartel enrichment, CCP enrichment, etc. Democrats love the Asylum Fraud loophole and, regardless of cost in lives, tax payer money, etc., count on it in the hopes to Californicate the rest of the Nation in the near future. Recap of the Asylum Fraud Loophole Step 1: Migrants claim asylum or credible fear at the border. Step 2: More than 80% of illegal aliens pass this low credible fear screening. Step 3: These illegal aliens are released into American communities. Step 4: Many of these illegal aliens never show up to immigration court, and only 15% who claim asylum or credible fear at the border are granted asylum. Step 5: None of the aliens denied asylum are deported under the Biden Administration’s non-enforcement policies. Step 6: Smugglers and traffickers point to the previous success of economic migrants being allowed into the U.S. to fuel the next wave of asylum fraud. Biden and the CCP are in bed with the Mexican Drug Cartels and no amount of deflection will change that reality. But, but what would you have Biden do? Hey Biden...Change the law and stop the Mexican Drug Cartel and CCP continuous pay day. Don't hold your breath. The resident troll returns. Hey, pretty easy softball question here: If the GOP was so undeniably concerned about border security, why did they vote no to increase border funding? 191 of them, to be exact. Quick followup: On their "field trips" to the southern border, what legislation have they proposed to actually fix anything? I'd give you a hint, but I don't want to spoil it. If the policy that allows the Asylum Fraud Loophole is not significantly changed, what would increased funding do to stop the international demand for entry to the U.S. via the Cartel controlled Southern Border? The Mexican Cartels will only lose power and money if the extorted and exploited illegal immigrants have little or no chance of getting past our border in the first place. And that policy change will never be proposed by any Democrat supporting the desired flood of undocumented future Democrats.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 25, 2023 13:26:48 GMT -8
The resident troll returns. Hey, pretty easy softball question here: If the GOP was so undeniably concerned about border security, why did they vote no to increase border funding? 191 of them, to be exact. Quick followup: On their "field trips" to the southern border, what legislation have they proposed to actually fix anything? I'd give you a hint, but I don't want to spoil it. If the policy that allows the Asylum Fraud Loophole is not significantly changed, what would increased funding do to stop the international demand for entry to the U.S. via the Cartel controlled Southern Border? The Mexican Cartels will only lose power and money if the extorted and exploited illegal immigrants have little or no chance of getting past our border in the first place. And that policy change will never be proposed by any Democrat supporting the desired flood of undocumented future Democrats. So basically you can't answer a simple question. Embarrassing. Let's backtrack and go slow so your mind doesn't pretzel itself. How many "illegals" that are crossing the border even seek asylum in the first place? How many actual cases of proven asylum fraud are there on average? What's the denial rate on asylum cases? Stop talking about the cartels for one second. (I know it's difficult with limited material, but please.) Increased funding, which again, Republicans have voted against on multiple occasions, allows for a greater presence of Border Patrol officers. It creates infrastructure to deal with the problem and meet the demand. The problem is that the Republicans aren't interested in solutions, they just want to point fingers and assign blame. The reality is most of them don't care one ounce about the border at all, it's just political theater to score points at the polls. You're truly just a hack, so I don't know why I bother. Back to your bridge.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 25, 2023 13:49:21 GMT -8
The resident troll returns. Hey, pretty easy softball question here: If the GOP was so undeniably concerned about border security, why did they vote no to increase border funding? 191 of them, to be exact. Quick followup: On their "field trips" to the southern border, what legislation have they proposed to actually fix anything? I'd give you a hint, but I don't want to spoil it. If the policy that allows the Asylum Fraud Loophole is not significantly changed, what would increased funding do to stop the international demand for entry to the U.S. via the Cartel controlled Southern Border? The Mexican Cartels will only lose power and money if the extorted and exploited illegal immigrants have little or no chance of getting past our border in the first place. And that policy change will never be proposed by any Democrat supporting the desired flood of undocumented future Democrats. "There are two different departments responsible for adjudicating asylum cases: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR). Neither USCIS nor EOIR release regular data on the number of cases terminated or investigated due to suspected fraud. However, according to a 2015 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, as overall asylum applications first began to rise during the early 2010s, USCIS terminations of asylum status due to discovered fraud decreased, falling from 103 in 2010 to 34 in 2014. USCIS granted 76,122 individuals asylum during the same time period. The report also found that EOIR opened just seven investigations into asylum fraud in 2014, a year when EOIR immigration judges granted asylum to 8,775 individuals. Claims that asylum fraud is on the rise are unsubstantiated by available data, and often rest on the mistaken assumption that an overall increase in rejections is indicative of a rise in fraud." Woof. Sounds like massive asylum fraud is occurring (except, no, not at all) so you're going to have to shift arguments back now. You're claiming there's rampant fraud, yet you don't think increased funding will do anything, the border is open, etc. If the border is open, why is there any asylum process at all? Do you ever get tired of looking like a schmuck?
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 25, 2023 20:54:09 GMT -8
It was ten generations ago although, it gives perspective to remember who did what. 13th Amendment - Abolished slavery. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 23% of the Democrats. 15th Amendment - Right to vote for all. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats.. 14th Amendment - Citizenship for freed slaves. Supported by 94% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats. That’s quite a legacy Dems, that’s what I was referring to. The Civil Rights act of 1964 would have never been passed without Republican support. Too many racist (KKK) Democrats didn’t support the bill and the GOP (the party who fought against and freed the slaves) carried the bill across the finish line in a bipartisan manner. Please don’t pretend the party of Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnston has a monopoly on the moral high ground of our country’s history. It’s actually the opposite. This is quite the bogus narrative. Political ideologies shift over the course of 200 years. There are a half dozen factions inside the modern-day Republican Party, at a minimum. Members of every political party owned slaves. Henry Clay spoke out against slavery, yet he himself owned 60 slaves. Please don't pretend that Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnson have political relevancy in 2023. Multiple different iterations of political parties have come and gone since then, with policy and philosophy radically changing over time. Post-1964, ideologically speaking, the modern parties have flipped. There are certainly plenty of more contemporary examples which I won’t mention (I have been “warned”). The bottom line is The Biden Administration has not secured our southern border and illegal migrants are pouring into our country in record shattering numbers while stretching our welfare services to the breaking point. The children working in the meat processing plants and as day laborers rather than going to school is one of several problems we are facing. It is a form of indentured labor and exploitation which The Biden Administration has promised to rectify but this far has been slow to react.
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 25, 2023 21:01:25 GMT -8
It was ten generations ago although, it gives perspective to remember who did what. 13th Amendment - Abolished slavery. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 23% of the Democrats. 15th Amendment - Right to vote for all. Supported by 100% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats.. 14th Amendment - Citizenship for freed slaves. Supported by 94% of the Republicans and 0% of the Democrats. That’s quite a legacy Dems, that’s what I was referring to. The Civil Rights act of 1964 would have never been passed without Republican support. Too many racist (KKK) Democrats didn’t support the bill and the GOP (the party who fought against and freed the slaves) carried the bill across the finish line in a bipartisan manner. Please don’t pretend the party of Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnston has a monopoly on the moral high ground of our country’s history. It’s actually the opposite. This is quite the bogus narrative. Political ideologies shift over the course of 200 years. There are a half dozen factions inside the modern-day Republican Party, at a minimum. Members of every political party owned slaves. Henry Clay spoke out against slavery, yet he himself owned 60 slaves. Please don't pretend that Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnson have political relevancy in 2023. Multiple different iterations of political parties have come and gone since then, with policy and philosophy radically changing over time. Post-1964, ideologically speaking, the modern parties have flipped. It’s not bogus if it happened and is the documented public record.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 25, 2023 21:20:54 GMT -8
This is quite the bogus narrative. Political ideologies shift over the course of 200 years. There are a half dozen factions inside the modern-day Republican Party, at a minimum. Members of every political party owned slaves. Henry Clay spoke out against slavery, yet he himself owned 60 slaves. Please don't pretend that Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnson have political relevancy in 2023. Multiple different iterations of political parties have come and gone since then, with policy and philosophy radically changing over time. Post-1964, ideologically speaking, the modern parties have flipped. It’s not bogus if it happened and is the documented public record. That's not quite how it works.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 25, 2023 21:22:10 GMT -8
This is quite the bogus narrative. Political ideologies shift over the course of 200 years. There are a half dozen factions inside the modern-day Republican Party, at a minimum. Members of every political party owned slaves. Henry Clay spoke out against slavery, yet he himself owned 60 slaves. Please don't pretend that Andrew Jackson and Andrew Johnson have political relevancy in 2023. Multiple different iterations of political parties have come and gone since then, with policy and philosophy radically changing over time. Post-1964, ideologically speaking, the modern parties have flipped. There are certainly plenty of more contemporary examples which I won’t mention (I have been “warned”). The bottom line is The Biden Administration has not secured our southern border and illegal migrants are pouring into our country in record shattering numbers while stretching our welfare services to the breaking point. The children working in the meat processing plants and as day laborers rather than going to school is one of several problems we are facing. It is a form of indentured labor and exploitation which The Biden Administration has promised to rectify but this far has been slow to react. And you didn't give a damn about the border prior to 2021. What changed? Are you okay with Iowa rolling child labor laws back in the middle of the night to put kids back to work? Believe it or not, Joe Biden can't solve everything. You can cite all the contemporary examples you want, it doesn't change the reality of the situation here. You're misrepresenting facts and creating an illusion against "Democrats" because it suits your agenda.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Apr 27, 2023 11:01:52 GMT -8
If the policy that allows the Asylum Fraud Loophole is not significantly changed, what would increased funding do to stop the international demand for entry to the U.S. via the Cartel controlled Southern Border? The Mexican Cartels will only lose power and money if the extorted and exploited illegal immigrants have little or no chance of getting past our border in the first place. And that policy change will never be proposed by any Democrat supporting the desired flood of undocumented future Democrats. "There are two different departments responsible for adjudicating asylum cases: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR). Neither USCIS nor EOIR release regular data on the number of cases terminated or investigated due to suspected fraud. However, according to a 2015 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, as overall asylum applications first began to rise during the early 2010s, USCIS terminations of asylum status due to discovered fraud decreased, falling from 103 in 2010 to 34 in 2014. USCIS granted 76,122 individuals asylum during the same time period. The report also found that EOIR opened just seven investigations into asylum fraud in 2014, a year when EOIR immigration judges granted asylum to 8,775 individuals. Claims that asylum fraud is on the rise are unsubstantiated by available data, and often rest on the mistaken assumption that an overall increase in rejections is indicative of a rise in fraud." Woof. Sounds like massive asylum fraud is occurring (except, no, not at all) so you're going to have to shift arguments back now. You're claiming there's rampant fraud, yet you don't think increased funding will do anything, the border is open, etc. If the border is open, why is there any asylum process at all? Do you ever get tired of looking like a schmuck? Really!?? Because the Government hides the data on the number and rate on the instances of immigration fraud, somehow immigration fraud doesn't really exist? Really? Fraud is defined as the wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. Fraud includes false representation of fact, making false statements, or by concealment of information. Making a claim of suffering Political Persecution when everyone knows that the preponderance of the illegal immigrants are simply economic refugees is, in fact, a fraud and nothing more. The statement "mistaken assumption that an overall increase in rejections is indicative of a rise in fraud" is telling. Please confirm - is that clueless leftist fact-checker like purposeful ignorance the basis of your argument that the current massive wave of illegal immigration is not necessarily illegal? Raise your hand if you are clueless enough to think that all (or lets say the vast majority) of the recent Haitian, Venezuelan, Cuban or Nicaraguan illegal immigrants are going to immediately report for deportation after they get their denial for political asylum (if they report to their Political Asylum hearing at all)? Get real! Schmuck indeed.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 27, 2023 13:23:26 GMT -8
"There are two different departments responsible for adjudicating asylum cases: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR). Neither USCIS nor EOIR release regular data on the number of cases terminated or investigated due to suspected fraud. However, according to a 2015 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, as overall asylum applications first began to rise during the early 2010s, USCIS terminations of asylum status due to discovered fraud decreased, falling from 103 in 2010 to 34 in 2014. USCIS granted 76,122 individuals asylum during the same time period. The report also found that EOIR opened just seven investigations into asylum fraud in 2014, a year when EOIR immigration judges granted asylum to 8,775 individuals. Claims that asylum fraud is on the rise are unsubstantiated by available data, and often rest on the mistaken assumption that an overall increase in rejections is indicative of a rise in fraud." Woof. Sounds like massive asylum fraud is occurring (except, no, not at all) so you're going to have to shift arguments back now. You're claiming there's rampant fraud, yet you don't think increased funding will do anything, the border is open, etc. If the border is open, why is there any asylum process at all? Do you ever get tired of looking like a schmuck? Really!?? Because the Government hides the data on the number and rate on the instances of immigration fraud, somehow immigration fraud doesn't really exist? Really? Fraud is defined as the wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. Fraud includes false representation of fact, making false statements, or by concealment of information. Making a claim of suffering Political Persecution when everyone knows that the preponderance of the illegal immigrants are simply economic refugees is, in fact, a fraud and nothing more. The statement "mistaken assumption that an overall increase in rejections is indicative of a rise in fraud" is telling. Please confirm - is that clueless leftist fact-checker like purposeful ignorance the basis of your argument that the current massive wave of illegal immigration is not necessarily illegal? Raise your hand if you are clueless enough to think that all (or lets say the vast majority) of the recent Haitian, Venezuelan, Cuban or Nicaraguan illegal immigrants are going to immediately report for deportation after they get their denial for political asylum (if they report to their Political Asylum hearing at all)? Get real! Schmuck indeed. The government hides the information? Where's your proof? Conspiracies don't fly with me. Do only the Democrats hide it? Even or odd years? The desperation to spread your anti-immigrant rhetoric is palpable. And here you go pretzeling again: Either there's rampant fraud or there isn't. (Spoiler: No, there isn't) Your entire unsubstantiated premise is built upon a fallacy. immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-asylum-fraud-and-immigration-court-absentia-rates/
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Apr 29, 2023 20:41:15 GMT -8
Really!?? Because the Government hides the data on the number and rate on the instances of immigration fraud, somehow immigration fraud doesn't really exist? Really? Fraud is defined as the wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. Fraud includes false representation of fact, making false statements, or by concealment of information. Making a claim of suffering Political Persecution when everyone knows that the preponderance of the illegal immigrants are simply economic refugees is, in fact, a fraud and nothing more. The statement "mistaken assumption that an overall increase in rejections is indicative of a rise in fraud" is telling. Please confirm - is that clueless leftist fact-checker like purposeful ignorance the basis of your argument that the current massive wave of illegal immigration is not necessarily illegal? Raise your hand if you are clueless enough to think that all (or lets say the vast majority) of the recent Haitian, Venezuelan, Cuban or Nicaraguan illegal immigrants are going to immediately report for deportation after they get their denial for political asylum (if they report to their Political Asylum hearing at all)? Get real! Schmuck indeed. The government hides the information? Where's your proof? Conspiracies don't fly with me. Do only the Democrats hide it? Even or odd years? The desperation to spread your anti-immigrant rhetoric is palpable. And here you go pretzeling again: Either there's rampant fraud or there isn't. (Spoiler: No, there isn't) Your entire unsubstantiated premise is built upon a fallacy. immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-asylum-fraud-and-immigration-court-absentia-rates/Does "While concrete data is limited" mean something else to you than it does to others? "The simple denial of an asylum claim should not be confused with the presence of asylum fraud." In clueless leftist bizarro world perhaps. Do you actually believe that the endless and countless streams of illegal immigrants (mostly single men 17 to 45) are not mostly economic refugees? www.foxnews.com/video/6315115030112Right...they are all political activists and journalists from Haiti, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, etc
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 29, 2023 21:54:40 GMT -8
The government hides the information? Where's your proof? Conspiracies don't fly with me. Do only the Democrats hide it? Even or odd years? The desperation to spread your anti-immigrant rhetoric is palpable. And here you go pretzeling again: Either there's rampant fraud or there isn't. (Spoiler: No, there isn't) Your entire unsubstantiated premise is built upon a fallacy. immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-asylum-fraud-and-immigration-court-absentia-rates/Does "While concrete data is limited" mean something else to you than it does to others? "The simple denial of an asylum claim should not be confused with the presence of asylum fraud." In clueless leftist bizarro world perhaps. Do you actually believe that the endless and countless streams of illegal immigrants (mostly single men 17 to 45) are not mostly economic refugees? www.foxnews.com/video/6315115030112Right...they are all political activists and journalists from Haiti, Venezuela, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, etc Yeah, call me crazy, but I'm not listening to Fox News for anything, especially on this topic. And no, I don't believe most are economic refugees. Overly simplistic, half-baked analysis.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 1, 2023 9:45:26 GMT -8
No wonder people actually believe this. It's spread constantly.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 1, 2023 11:21:27 GMT -8
No wonder people actually believe this. It's spread constantly. Our borders are never completely secured, but do you think they were more secure under Trump?
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on May 2, 2023 1:43:44 GMT -8
KJP'S (d.c.spokes idiot) biggest lie is claiming that illegal immigration is down 90% thanks to biden, Photos and videos on these illegal immigrants had them wear biden, please let us in T-shirts. Even snopes had to say fact checked true on the t-shirts. I.C.E. enforcement numbers say 90% is the drop in deportations of illegal border crossers under biden.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 2, 2023 10:21:48 GMT -8
No wonder people actually believe this. It's spread constantly. Our borders are never completely secured, but do you think they were more secure under Trump? No.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 2, 2023 10:33:54 GMT -8
KJP'S (d.c.spokes idiot) biggest lie is claiming that illegal immigration is down 90% thanks to biden, Photos and videos on these illegal immigrants had them wear biden, please let us in T-shirts. Even snopes had to say fact checked true on the t-shirts. I.C.E. enforcement numbers say 90% is the drop in deportations of illegal border crossers under biden. While Karina is a moron and terrible at her job, this is factually incorrect. ICE carried out 72,000+ deportations in 2022, up slightly from 2021.
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on May 2, 2023 15:38:04 GMT -8
KJP'S (d.c.spokes idiot) biggest lie is claiming that illegal immigration is down 90% thanks to biden, Photos and videos on these illegal immigrants had them wear biden, please let us in T-shirts. Even snopes had to say fact checked true on the t-shirts. I.C.E. enforcement numbers say 90% is the drop in deportations of illegal border crossers under biden. While Karina is a moron and terrible at her job, this is factually incorrect. ICE carried out 72,000+ deportations in 2022, up slightly from 2021. I’m glad we have you to decode the WH bull$#!7 line.
|
|