|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 31, 2021 17:25:36 GMT -8
I would feel better about the chances of the House committee producing valid conclusions that would generally be accepted by the public if Pelosi had rounded up five GOP members to fill out the five slots that she so generously gave the opposition party. Again I ask, were two of the most anti-Trump Republicans the ONLY ones she could convince to serve? Seems to me that her policy is a bit like the prosecution choosing the jurors. And only jurors whom the prosecution felt sure would vote to convict. And again I add that I am sure there is a lot of bad stuff that can legitimately be charged to DJT. But even the most heinous of defendants are allowed to have a defense attorney. If Trump is so obviously guilty, no matter how biased the Republican members on the committee might be, they could not hid the truth. Those who disagree with me may not realize that 7 Dems and 2 openly anti-Trump Republicans will look a bit suspicious to a whole lot of Americans. It will not look quite fair. It's those, the millions of Trump supporters, that we should want to convince. Remember, even the leading Nazis were represented by defense attorneys in Nuremberg. Of course, I tend to forget that some anti-Trumpers apparently consider Donald Trump to be much, much worse than Adolf Hitler. AzWm Crickets... |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 31, 2021 17:31:18 GMT -8
Truly some of the dumbest people on the planet.
|
|
|
|
Post by azson on Sept 1, 2021 11:32:44 GMT -8
Truly some of the dumbest people on the planet. Poster children for the idiocracy that we've become. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Sept 1, 2021 11:37:36 GMT -8
Truly some of the dumbest people on the planet. Poster children for the idiocracy that we've become. Unfortunately. its come down to money. The village idiot could make money off of that audience..or a sock puppet. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Sept 1, 2021 18:54:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by sdsustoner on Sept 4, 2021 7:20:51 GMT -8
Truly some of the dumbest people on the planet. Are they? Or are they pandering to a larger group of bigger idiots? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Sept 7, 2021 8:33:59 GMT -8
I would feel better about the chances of the House committee producing valid conclusions that would generally be accepted by the public if Pelosi had rounded up five GOP members to fill out the five slots that she so generously gave the opposition party. Again I ask, were two of the most anti-Trump Republicans the ONLY ones she could convince to serve? Seems to me that her policy is a bit like the prosecution choosing the jurors. And only jurors whom the prosecution felt sure would vote to convict. And again I add that I am sure there is a lot of bad stuff that can legitimately be charged to DJT. But even the most heinous of defendants are allowed to have a defense attorney. If Trump is so obviously guilty, no matter how biased the Republican members on the committee might be, they could not hid the truth. Those who disagree with me may not realize that 7 Dems and 2 openly anti-Trump Republicans will look a bit suspicious to a whole lot of Americans. It will not look quite fair. It's those, the millions of Trump supporters, that we should want to convince. Remember, even the leading Nazis were represented by defense attorneys in Nuremberg. Of course, I tend to forget that some anti-Trumpers apparently consider Donald Trump to be much, much worse than Adolf Hitler. AzWm Still waiting for a response.... |
|
