|
|
Post by Gundo on Jul 13, 2020 9:35:36 GMT -8
This years roster inlcudes a total of 17 players, 12 on scholarship and 5 walk-ons. goaztecs.com/sports/mens-basketball/rosterSeniors (5)Gomez Pulliam Mitchell Schakel Tomiac Juinors (3)Sieko Mensah Arop Sophomore (2)Johnson Barrett Freshman (7)Butler Dinwiddie Evans Alger Mohar Tr Broughton Ty Broughton |
|
|
|
Post by moctezumaii on Jul 13, 2020 9:40:35 GMT -8
Kinda smallish sized, but excellent veteran leadership. Seniors lead the way.
|
|
|
|
Post by MarshallU on Jul 13, 2020 9:40:46 GMT -8
Mitchell? Didn't he take his talents to the next level?
|
|
|
|
Post by drshotblock on Jul 13, 2020 9:57:31 GMT -8
Looks like a solid 7-9 deep of proven players, with 2-3 high potential question marks.
Starters:
- Gomez
- Pulliam
- Schakel
- Mitchell
- Mensah
Immediate rotation:
- Seiko
- Arop
Top rotation:
- Tomiac
- Johnson
Next up:
- Butler
- Evans
- Dinwiddie
|
|
|
|
Post by Gundo on Jul 13, 2020 10:12:04 GMT -8
This years roster inlcudes a total of 17 players, 12 on scholarship and 5 walk-ons. goaztecs.com/sports/mens-basketball/rosterSeniors (5)Gomez Pulliam Mitchell Schakel Tomiac Juinors (3)Sieko Mensah Arop Sophomore (2)Johnson Barrett Freshman (7)Butler Dinwiddie Evans Alger Mohar Tr Broughton Ty Broughton |
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on Jul 13, 2020 10:33:29 GMT -8
Mitchell? Didn't he take his talents to the next level? Only testing the waters. Almost for sure will be back. |
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on Jul 13, 2020 10:35:19 GMT -8
Those first three freshmen in the list will be heavily needed in 21/22.
|
|
|
|
Post by MarshallU on Jul 13, 2020 10:50:59 GMT -8
Mitchell? Didn't he take his talents to the next level? Only testing the waters. Almost for sure will be back. But even at the "testing the waters" level, I would think they leave him off this list for now at least. |
|
|
|
Post by survalli on Jul 13, 2020 10:52:04 GMT -8
looks like the walk-ons had enough for their own squad.
|
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on Jul 13, 2020 11:15:37 GMT -8
Only testing the waters. Almost for sure will be back. But even at the "testing the waters" level, I would think they leave him off this list for now at least. Traditionally, as far as I know anyway, schools will leave those players on their roster until they have either hired an agent or declared that they are definitely not coming back. |
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Jul 13, 2020 11:43:17 GMT -8
Would guess if he is enrolled at SDSU for summer or fall - he would be on the roster until he tells them differently think he may have until around Aug 3 - not sure of exact date as things change
last year our starting guards each played 30+ minutes a game this year things could be different - maybe guards by committee this year or as needed
We should have good players at the 3 position and very likely at the 4
Major question is at the 5 - How healthy is Nathan and has he developed as a player on both ends on the court - we know he is very good at defending the rim - but sometimes makes some fouls that take him out of the game early . Can Joshua provide decent back up TBD
do wish they would change the rule about players only able to wear jerseys with the numbers 0-5
Any one know if there were any rule changes going into the season ? Or s it every other year ?
|
|
|
|
Post by MarshallU on Jul 13, 2020 12:47:59 GMT -8
But even at the "testing the waters" level, I would think they leave him off this list for now at least. Traditionally, as far as I know anyway, schools will leave those players on their roster until they have either hired an agent or declared that they are definitely not coming back. well hopefully they know something we don't  would love to have him back for his senior year. |
|
|
|
Post by azteca on Jul 13, 2020 12:52:30 GMT -8
Traditionally, as far as I know anyway, schools will leave those players on their roster until they have either hired an agent or declared that they are definitely not coming back. well hopefully they know something we don't would love to have him back for his senior year. So do you know something the rest of us don’t? |
|
|
|
Post by fisherville on Jul 13, 2020 13:20:19 GMT -8
Maybe I’m wrong but I don’t think this means Mitchell is coming back for sure. Just that the door is still open. Based on everything matt has said I think he’ll wait till the last second to announce and he’ll likely be back
|
|
|
|
Post by fisherville on Jul 13, 2020 13:34:28 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Jul 13, 2020 14:15:12 GMT -8
Is the article mentioned current or from Sept 2019 ? Where it mentions 4 injured players
|
|
|
|
Post by MarshallU on Jul 13, 2020 14:34:07 GMT -8
well hopefully they know something we don't would love to have him back for his senior year. So do you know something the rest of us don’t? i do not. just hope he comes back. |
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Jul 13, 2020 14:36:06 GMT -8
Looks like a solid 7-9 deep of proven players, with 2-3 high potential question marks. Starters: - Gomez - Pulliam - Schakel - Mitchell - Mensah Immediate rotation: - Seiko - Arop Top rotation: - Tomiac - Johnson Next up: - Butler - Evans - Dinwiddie I'd basically say the same, except I think Tomiac is more immediate rotation (he'll play behind Nate), and I'd slide Seiko down a notch. I think either Arop or Johnson fall into the "first off the bench" category, along with Tomiac. The "first off the bench" vs. "also in main rotation" is dependent upon whether Dutch makes wholesale changes or just blends the subs in? Hard to predict. First off the bench: - Tomaic - Arop or Johnson > In this scenario I think if it's Arop or Johnson we could see Matt/Jordan slide down a spot with either Gomez or Pulliam still on the floor. Also in main rotation: - Arop or Johnson - Seiko or Evans or Butler or Dinwiddie > I think Dutch sticks to a 9-man rotation, and we'll see a lot of Arop & Johnson, with the 9th spot being a guard of some type. In a perfect world Seiko would slide into the #2 spot as a 3 & D specialist, but if we need more of a ball handler we could see 1 of the FR emerge. I think that 9th spot basically comes down to the weaknesses at the other spots. Do we need more D, ballhandling or shooting in the rotation, which could come down to who's in foul trouble, etc.? Next up: - Seiko/Butler/Evans /Dinwiddie The "perfect" roster would probably also include a FR or SO transfer big who'd sit this year & could step into the rotation next year. However, if the transfer waiver rule comes into play there will be many candidates for that same spot next year. |
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Jul 13, 2020 14:39:36 GMT -8
Is the article mentioned current or from Sept 2019 ? Where it mentions 4 injured players Did you check the date? You answered your own question. I'm guessing it was posted as a reference to a couple of the WO's on the roster, and what all 5 WO's will thrive to be. Hoping at least 1 of the Broughton's will have a chance to suit up this year - they both can play, but my guess is it'll be Barrett, Alger & Mohar. |
|
|
|
Post by drshotblock on Jul 13, 2020 16:14:57 GMT -8
Looks like a solid 7-9 deep of proven players, with 2-3 high potential question marks. Starters: - Gomez - Pulliam - Schakel - Mitchell - Mensah Immediate rotation: - Seiko - Arop Top rotation: - Tomiac - Johnson Next up: - Butler - Evans - Dinwiddie I'd basically say the same, except I think Tomiac is more immediate rotation (he'll play behind Nate), and I'd slide Seiko down a notch. I think either Arop or Johnson fall into the "first off the bench" category, along with Tomiac. The "first off the bench" vs. "also in main rotation" is dependent upon whether Dutch makes wholesale changes or just blends the subs in? Hard to predict. First off the bench: - Tomaic - Arop or Johnson > In this scenario I think if it's Arop or Johnson we could see Matt/Jordan slide down a spot with either Gomez or Pulliam still on the floor. Also in main rotation: - Arop or Johnson - Seiko or Evans or Butler or Dinwiddie > I think Dutch sticks to a 9-man rotation, and we'll see a lot of Arop & Johnson, with the 9th spot being a guard of some type. In a perfect world Seiko would slide into the #2 spot as a 3 & D specialist, but if we need more of a ball handler we could see 1 of the FR emerge. I think that 9th spot basically comes down to the weaknesses at the other spots. Do we need more D, ballhandling or shooting in the rotation, which could come down to who's in foul trouble, etc.? Next up: - Seiko/Butler/Evans /Dinwiddie The "perfect" roster would probably also include a FR or SO transfer big who'd sit this year & could step into the rotation next year. However, if the transfer waiver rule comes into play there will be many candidates for that same spot next year. I'm sure you're right, but I thought that Seiko did so well last year that he would be hard to keep off the floor. It looks to me like a logjam with Tomiac, Arop, Johnson and Seiko, except that Seiko is the best ball handler of those guys. All in all, a good problem to have! |
|
