|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 7, 2020 17:52:27 GMT -8
Is from Obama, Biden, Rice, Clapper, Comey and Schiff now that the details of the Russia Hoax are being laid bare with the acquittal of Flynn and the release of the House Intel Committee transcripts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2020 17:56:40 GMT -8
Is from Obama, Rice, Clapper, Comey and Schiff now that the details of the Russia Hoax are being laid bare with the acquittal of Flynn and the release of the House Intel Committee transcripts. Yeah, and according to the sheep, somehow we don't post facts. This is going to get good!! 🍿 |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on May 7, 2020 19:45:40 GMT -8
And when the Durham report comes out.....................
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 8, 2020 7:49:36 GMT -8
The FBI's McCabe said he was not able to confirm the claims against the innocent Carter Page within the Russian disinformation dossier given to them by Steele yet he and the FBI requests to spy on him anyhow. A fraud committed on the FISA Court.
It was under the following fraudulent FISA applications where the Obama White House spies on and hears Flynn talk to a Russian diplomat (legitimate as Flynn was part of the transition team).
The FBI's field agents reported that they had no derogatory information against Flynn when FBI's Peter Strzok requested to keep the investigation going against Flynn.
The FBI uses the phony threat of the Logan Act (not applicable) to entrap Flynn into covering up his legitimate conversation with the Russian diplomat.
The FBI charges Flynn with lying and bankrupts Flynn and threatens to bankrupt and imprison his son if he didn't flip on Trump, so he relents. Blackmail effectively.
In subsequent open investigations in the House and Senate, it becomes clear that the FISA Warrants, the threat of the Logan Act, the intent of the FBI was all fraudulent, so Flynn gets new counsel to fight against the coerced guilty plea he offered.
New counsel for Flynn obtains exculpatory information that the FBI withheld and would have otherwise normally been given to a defendant if he had contested the charge.
As things unravel for the DoJ's case, the partisan witch-hunter Prosecutor resigns from the case and it is dismissed.
Coincidentally, transcripts from the House Intelligence Committee shows that the Obama Whitehouse was the real architect of all this fraudulent action and they they all knew full well beforehand there was no "there there" in the claim of Russian collusion by Trump and his campaign.
Who are these people?
And who are the journalists, politicians and true believers that say justice wasn't served when General Flynn didn't go to prison?
I feel like I need to take a shower when I think of these people.
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 8, 2020 20:09:16 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 8, 2020 20:55:46 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 9, 2020 7:16:29 GMT -8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2020 8:12:18 GMT -8
No bro, the deniers are still over in the other threads trying to convince their flock that all we do is spread lies misinformation, copy and paste and deflect from their hypocrisy. Yet somehow the people who are exposing the truth are uneducated cult members that are in too deep. And what's the deniers play now? The DOJ is corupt so no big deal. Or that was years ago, let's get back to current topics. Un-fing believable!! 🍿 |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on May 9, 2020 8:53:44 GMT -8
And that flushing sound you hear is the Me Too movement getting flushed down the toilet. Hypocrites.
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 13, 2020 20:29:31 GMT -8
theintercept.com/2017/01/13/obama-opens-nsas-vast-trove-of-warrantless-data-to-entire-intelligence-community-just-in-time-for-trump/At he time, many wondered why Obama would sign the update to Exec. Order 12333 allowing the Intel community to openly share raw intercept data within the Admin with just but one week left to go in his Administration. It now seems, given all the unmasking of Flynn in Obama's final days, he was actually letting the dogs out against Flynn (and by association Trump, Sessions, etc) and hoping that embarrasing intel on Flynn, Trump, Sessions, etc would make it to the press by way of loyalists in the deep state On January 12, 2017, the same day Obama signs the EO, Washington Post columnist David Ignatius reported that Flynn had phoned Kislyak “several times on Dec. 29. Other leaks to papers occur by the deep state (and costs Andrew McCabe his job at the FBI by the way). We all now know that the Russia Collusion was fake news and that President Barry was a prime player in the attempted setup. With Holder, et al complaining vociferously about the assertion that is was all Barry's plot, the phrase "the lady doth protest too much methinks" comes to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 14, 2020 7:47:47 GMT -8
www.foxnews.com/politics/flynn-unmasking-samantha-power-testimonyThis is an interesting item in this article: "Former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power sought to obtain Michael Flynn's redacted identity using an "unmasking" request on at least seven occasions, according to newly declassified list of names released Wednesday -- even though Power testified under oath before the House Intelligence Committee that she had “no recollection” of ever making such a request even once." "Then-House Oversight & Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said Power had testified that she had not personally directed all of the unmasking requests that appeared in her name." She can't recall making the unmasking requests on Flynn but knows enough to say she had not personally directed all the unmaskings that appear in her name. Doesn't that beg a few questions? Like "Who made the other unmasking requests in your name and why?" And "How is it that you specifically know that some requests to unmask US Citizens made in your name were not personally directed by you yet you can't recall any of your seven unmaskings of Flynn?"
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 15, 2020 7:09:36 GMT -8
sidneypowell.com/media/open-memorandum-to-barack-obama/Ouch again! I see where Obama tweeted only "Vote". He is a quick learner. Having himself, Joe and the rest of the conspirators just shut up and say nothing is probably their best play. The Press will do the rest of their bidding.
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 20, 2020 7:42:04 GMT -8
Link: Susan Rice CYA LetterClearly Rice documents that Obama is concerned with Flynn but also notes they are without evidence of Flynn doing anything wrong. Had Flynn done anything wrong, Comey would have so said in that January White House meeting. Obama/Biden asks Yates and Comey to stay after their meeting. Yates and Comey are the only ones in that cabal that are expected to be in position after the Inauguration. Yates is taken aback with the level of detail that Obama has on Flynn, an obsession perhaps. Comey is nothing if not completely eager to take direction from Obama into the next Administration. The take down of Flynn was a plot by Obama and his loyalist's from the beginning. If not shady, why does Rice write a note to herself two weeks after the meeting as she is stepping out the door? She knew what they were doing was shady and she is effectively preparing to throw Comey under the bus should anything go wrong in the coming take down. Smart girl. She gets to say "hey...we wanted the Flynn investigation to be done by the book. If Comey and Yates or others abused their offices in the pursuit of Flynn, that is on them".
|
|
|
|
Post by ramrodd23 on May 20, 2020 8:51:03 GMT -8
Link: Susan Rice CYA LetterClearly Rice documents that Obama is concerned with Flynn but also notes they are without evidence of Flynn doing anything wrong. Had Flynn done anything wrong, Comey would have so said in that January White House meeting. Obama/Biden asks Yates and Comey to stay after their meeting. Yates and Comey are the only ones in that cabal that are expected to be in position after the Inauguration. Yates is taken aback with the level of detail that Obama has on Flynn, an obsession perhaps. Comey is nothing if not completely eager to take direction from Obama into the next Administration. The take down of Flynn was a plot by Obama and his loyalist's from the beginning. If not shady, why does Rice write a note to herself two weeks after the meeting as she is stepping out the door? She knew what they were doing was shady and she is effectively preparing to throw Comey under the bus should anything go wrong in the coming take down. Smart girl. She gets to say "hey...we wanted the Flynn investigation to be done by the book. If Comey and Yates or others abused their offices in the pursuit of Flynn, that is on them". You really need to reread it again. Also, Flynn pleaded guilty in court. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2020 9:03:36 GMT -8
Link: Susan Rice CYA LetterClearly Rice documents that Obama is concerned with Flynn but also notes they are without evidence of Flynn doing anything wrong. Had Flynn done anything wrong, Comey would have so said in that January White House meeting. Obama/Biden asks Yates and Comey to stay after their meeting. Yates and Comey are the only ones in that cabal that are expected to be in position after the Inauguration. Yates is taken aback with the level of detail that Obama has on Flynn, an obsession perhaps. Comey is nothing if not completely eager to take direction from Obama into the next Administration. The take down of Flynn was a plot by Obama and his loyalist's from the beginning. If not shady, why does Rice write a note to herself two weeks after the meeting as she is stepping out the door? She knew what they were doing was shady and she is effectively preparing to throw Comey under the bus should anything go wrong in the coming take down. Smart girl. She gets to say "hey...we wanted the Flynn investigation to be done by the book. If Comey and Yates or others abused their offices in the pursuit of Flynn, that is on them". You really need to reread it again. Also, Flynn pleaded guilty in court. You need to read more as well. Flynn was blackmailed into pleading guilty. That included threats against him and his family. This is going to continue to be exposed. It's not going away. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 20, 2020 9:04:31 GMT -8
Link: Susan Rice CYA LetterClearly Rice documents that Obama is concerned with Flynn but also notes they are without evidence of Flynn doing anything wrong. Had Flynn done anything wrong, Comey would have so said in that January White House meeting. Obama/Biden asks Yates and Comey to stay after their meeting. Yates and Comey are the only ones in that cabal that are expected to be in position after the Inauguration. Yates is taken aback with the level of detail that Obama has on Flynn, an obsession perhaps. Comey is nothing if not completely eager to take direction from Obama into the next Administration. The take down of Flynn was a plot by Obama and his loyalist's from the beginning. If not shady, why does Rice write a note to herself two weeks after the meeting as she is stepping out the door? She knew what they were doing was shady and she is effectively preparing to throw Comey under the bus should anything go wrong in the coming take down. Smart girl. She gets to say "hey...we wanted the Flynn investigation to be done by the book. If Comey and Yates or others abused their offices in the pursuit of Flynn, that is on them". You really need to reread it again. Also, Flynn pleaded guilty in court. I read it. Apparently the threat of a son going to jail and his family going bankrupt is somehow meaningless to some. Comey broke all previous protocols in the setup. McCabe lied and said he didn't need a lawyer. FBI planted false reports in the WaPo about the Flynn wiretaps to gaslight him. Documents that Nunes saw on the Flynn interview that reportedly had exculpatory details are now missing. Criminal leaks to the WaPo's David Ignatius are not being investigated. All routine for your FBI perhaps, not mine. Your really need to reread this again: thefederalist.com/2020/05/08/obama-biden-oval-office-meeting-on-january-5-was-key-to-entire-anti-trump-operation/#.XrWokR2f0J9.twitter |
|
|
|
Post by ramrodd23 on May 20, 2020 9:08:48 GMT -8
You really need to reread it again. Also, Flynn pleaded guilty in court. You need to read more as well. Flynn was blackmailed into pleading guilty. That included threats against him and his family. This is going to continue to be exposed. It's not going away. Sure ok buddy. If he is blackmailed as you say why hasn’t he said anything about it now. Your right on one thing. it going to get exposed and Barr head is going to be on the table. |
|
|
|
Post by ramrodd23 on May 20, 2020 9:15:12 GMT -8
You really need to reread it again. Also, Flynn pleaded guilty in court. I read it. Apparently the threat of a son going to jail and his family going bankrupt is somehow meaningless to some. McCabe lied and said he didn't need a lawyer. Documents that Nunes saw on the Flynn interview that reportedly had exculpatory details are now missing. Criminal leaks to the WaPo's David Ignatius. All routine for your FBI perhaps, not mine. You mean Michael Flynn Jr that worked closely with his father, whose connections to foreign governments, including Russia and Turkey, have been a subject of federal and congressional investigations. That Michael Flynn Jr? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2020 9:19:20 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 20, 2020 9:22:02 GMT -8
I read it. Apparently the threat of a son going to jail and his family going bankrupt is somehow meaningless to some. McCabe lied and said he didn't need a lawyer. Documents that Nunes saw on the Flynn interview that reportedly had exculpatory details are now missing. Criminal leaks to the WaPo's David Ignatius. All routine for your FBI perhaps, not mine. You mean Michael Flynn Jr that worked closely with his father, whose connections to foreign governments, including Russia and Turkey, have been a subject of federal and congressional investigations. That Michael Flynn Jr? The one doing no worse (and likley much more honest) than Hunter Biden. Yes, that one. |
|
