|
Post by sdcoug on Jun 9, 2017 10:07:36 GMT -8
Just like the lower part of the Q is useless. Definitely not the best, but I went to a game at AT&T. I've seen worse. And that game is no longer at AT&T. I have always wondered why they built that park the way they did with deep dimensions. Petco was built with deep dimensions as well, but for reasons not associated with football--hence the "no American football shall be played at the park" language in the MOU. And yes, I know it can be changed, but it would be a mistake, IMO. I went when Cal played their entire season there, as Petco is being proposed for SDSU. It wasn't bad. For ONE year. They moved the bowl game out of there because Levi's stadium was build. Nobody's building Levi's stadium in SD. It was fine for 11 years prior.
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Jun 9, 2017 10:25:51 GMT -8
And that game is no longer at AT&T. I have always wondered why they built that park the way they did with deep dimensions. Petco was built with deep dimensions as well, but for reasons not associated with football--hence the "no American football shall be played at the park" language in the MOU. And yes, I know it can be changed, but it would be a mistake, IMO. I went when Cal played their entire season there, as Petco is being proposed for SDSU. It wasn't bad. For ONE year. They moved the bowl game out of there because Levi's stadium was build. Nobody's building Levi's stadium in SD. It was fine for 11 years prior. Fine? I've talked to people who thought it sucked. To each their own, I suppose. My opinion? It won't even be necessary, as SDSU stays at the Q until a new stadium is built in MV.
|
|
|
Post by AccessBowlTime on Jun 9, 2017 10:30:49 GMT -8
We would play at Petco for one year, two tops, so I just don't understand the continued opposition to the idea.
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Jun 9, 2017 10:34:39 GMT -8
We would play at Petco for one year, two tops, so I just don't understand the continued opposition to the idea. I think the majority don't oppose it for a year - it's a stop gap that hopefully won't impact scheduling. However, it's the 2nd year that is definitely worthy of debate, given what the Pads have said. Personally, I'd hate for our team to play on the road for 2 months straight. I think that'd be very bad for the program.
|
|