|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Oct 26, 2010 5:52:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Oct 26, 2010 5:55:23 GMT -8
Any man who would maliciously stomp on a woman like that needs to be put to death. There are no ifs, ands, or buts. No excuse is acceptable. Find him and shoot him.
|
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Oct 26, 2010 7:34:54 GMT -8
A tad over-reacting??? Guy should be arrested for assault, but shot?   |
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Oct 26, 2010 8:26:52 GMT -8
A tad over-reacting??? Guy should be arrested for assault, but shot? "Stomping" is an automatic felony. The guy should be thrown in the slammer and the key thrown away. |
|
|
|
Post by Aztec89 on Oct 26, 2010 9:19:03 GMT -8
We need to get all the facts. He is presumed innocent.
And can you imagine the outrage on this board if someone suggested a Democrat be shot?
If the boots don't fit, you must acquit.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Oct 26, 2010 10:33:58 GMT -8
We need to get all the facts. He is presumed innocent. And can you imagine the outrage on this board if someone suggested a Democrat be shot? If the boots don't fit, you must acquit. LOL We have grown used to having aztecwin want an open season on liberals. |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Oct 26, 2010 11:32:48 GMT -8
A tad over-reacting??? Guy should be arrested for assault, but shot? I am slowly coming around to being a conservative. The first thing that overcomes an old man when he becomes more conservative is the old fashioned belief that men if they are real men should always be protectors of women, no matter how fooolish, dumb, idiotic or just plain nutz their behavior is. I have no qualms about telling them to get psychiatric help when they need it, as most women are nutz. BUT, beating them, stepping on their heads, killing them ist verbotten! Men who strike women need to be put to death. That is all there is to it if you are an old fashioned conservative. Don't even try to deny that fact. |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Oct 26, 2010 11:40:23 GMT -8
What this string actually proves is that we get a whole lot more comment when there is a ringer on the board who takes outlandish stands and tells "Interesting" stories. People tune in for the daily entertainment. You gotta admit that there was a whole lot more participation when the old Aztec Joe was posting rather than the watered down namby pamby Liberal that I have become.
I am going to complete my on again, off again cruise around the world. Last I was in Singapore. I think I will catch a freighter to Mumbai. I may travel to some old haunts in India and then procede west to Kenya. All of Africa with the overpopulation problem is one big cess pool of rot and filth and degradation. When I come back from there, I will be ready to be a radical conservative again and I'll have some stories for you. See you guys in a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Oct 26, 2010 12:34:46 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 26, 2010 15:40:39 GMT -8
We need to get all the facts. He is presumed innocent. And can you imagine the outrage on this board if someone suggested a Democrat be shot? If the boots don't fit, you must acquit. LOL We have grown used to having aztecwin want an open season on liberals. With no limit and no license or tag required.  Really, this is just uncalled for even if the stompee was provoking them. No excuse for that action and the guy was fired. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Oct 26, 2010 16:36:00 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by sandiegopete on Oct 26, 2010 19:19:31 GMT -8
I watched the video of this incident. While one Tea Party coward held the woman down another Tea Party coward stomped on her head. This incident illustrates how the Tea Party will not tolerate dissent.
|
|
|
|
Post by sandiegopete on Oct 26, 2010 19:39:44 GMT -8
It seems that the Tea Party has taken the renowned quote, often mistakenly attributed to Voltaire, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" and turned it around to to express their stand as: "I disagree with what you have to say and will fight to the death to prevent you from saying it." This is the sorry state of American culture.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aztec89 on Oct 27, 2010 4:49:57 GMT -8
It seems that the Tea Party has taken the renowned quote, often mistakenly attributed to Voltaire, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" and turned it around to to express their stand as: "I disagree with what you have to say and will fight to the death to prevent you from saying it." This is the sorry state of American culture. Wow. Those quotes were taken right out of the NPR employee handbook. |
|
|
|
Post by uwaztec on Oct 27, 2010 6:37:51 GMT -8
It seems that the Tea Party has taken the renowned quote, often mistakenly attributed to Voltaire, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" and turned it around to to express their stand as: "I disagree with what you have to say and will fight to the death to prevent you from saying it." This is the sorry state of American culture. Wow. Those quotes were taken right out of the NPR employee handbook. Juan Williams and NPR were having trouble for quite awhile over his FOX appearances. NPR was looking for a reason to sever ties. Juan was completely different in his delivery of information on NPR than he was on FOX with the likes of O'Reilly and Hannity. He is the perfect "liberal foil" for Hannity and O'Reilly... something that Colmbes just couldn't take anymore with Hannity. I disagree with his firing and think he is a good guy, but $3,000,000 will affect the way you carry yourself and the way you pick your fights. Funny how every "Liberal" attacked on FOX is a pinhead or blamed for every problem facing the USA, until you join the "Team"..... then you are cool (as long as you don't cause trouble). |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 27, 2010 11:26:11 GMT -8
Two wrongs never make a right, but where is the outrage from liberals over these SEIU thugs giving that guy a going over? I guess liberals think that one is OK. |
|
|
|
Post by waztec on Oct 27, 2010 15:28:04 GMT -8
Men who stomp on women when they are prostrate on the sidewalk, after they have been effectively subdued, have problems in my opinion.
Compare the event to anything you like, it still looks awful to see that person stomp the much smaller person on the head.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 27, 2010 16:20:42 GMT -8
Men who stomp on women when they are prostrate on the sidewalk, after they have been effectively subdued, have problems in my opinion. Compare the event to anything you like, it still looks awful to see that person stomp the much smaller person on the head. I agree that stomping that women was very wrong. Are you saying that the SEIU thugs incident was OK? |
|
|
|
Post by waztec on Oct 27, 2010 17:21:14 GMT -8
Men who stomp on women when they are prostrate on the sidewalk, after they have been effectively subdued, have problems in my opinion. Compare the event to anything you like, it still looks awful to see that person stomp the much smaller person on the head. I agree that stomping that women was very wrong. Are you saying that the SEIU thugs incident was OK? If true, the SEIU incident you refer to would be wrong as well. But, I haven't seen that video. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 28, 2010 4:55:22 GMT -8
I agree that stomping that women was very wrong. Are you saying that the SEIU thugs incident was OK? If true, the SEIU incident you refer to would be wrong as well. But, I haven't seen that video. The link is in the Davdesid post above. Are you telling me you did not bother to look at the evidence presented before making a comment? Are you not somewhat appalled at the fact that neither of these reprehensible incidents would have happened without Moveon.org and/or SEIU initiated action? |
|
