Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 25, 2014 13:04:45 GMT -8
How does the plume of gasoline under the Q property bear on the development of a West Campus? I would think it could create a major problem.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 25, 2014 13:18:35 GMT -8
How does the plume of gasoline under the Q property bear on the development of a West Campus? I would think it could create a major problem. I don't disagree but consider this. SDSU is a public entity. Public entities have been known to get the Legislature to exempt them from things that private ventures are always obligated to comply with. Posters here can argue all THEY want about the fairness of that but I feel great appreciation for how much my two degrees from SDSU for a modest price were the foundation of what has been a very successful career. And since SDSU academics would benefit immensely from admission to the B12 or - yes, I DO dare say it - the Pac-12 and owning Qualcomm and being able to format it to fit SDSU's needs would really help, here's hoping the Legislature would get that and allow my alma mater not have to comply with every piddly environmental law that far left politicians have managed to get enacted.
|
|
|
Post by FULL_MONTY on Dec 25, 2014 13:40:23 GMT -8
How does the plume of gasoline under the Q property bear on the development of a West Campus? I would think it could create a major problem. The Ground has already been remediated and Kinder is responsible for monitoring the land for sole long as the Terminal is being operated. What is remaining, is the aquifer, which is not a threat to development unless they want a new Chem lab under water. www.kpbs.org/news/2013/may/09/san-diego-sues-state-regulators-over-kinder-morgan/The City and the California Regional Water Quality Board are fighting over how the Aquifer is being remediated, but there is nothing wrong with the earth at the Q.
|
|