|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Dec 31, 2011 18:36:11 GMT -8
I see. So this country demands that every "leader" we have must meet a religious test and must be a "Christian". You are arguing theocracy Pooh. You are arguing that there should be a religious test when it comes to elections. This doesn't surprise me given the worthless POS state you come from, but it does surprise me that you'd offer such a ridiculous argument. =Bob Again, you miss the point. It is not what he is, but what he claims to be. Lots of evidence points to his being untruthful. Worthless POS State? Troll on little fella! If Montana is worth anything, I'm not sure what it is. It's basically Wyoming without the class. What evidence that doesn't come from World Daily News or one of your other sad websites points to him not being truthful? =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 1, 2012 13:29:16 GMT -8
Again, you miss the point. It is not what he is, but what he claims to be. Lots of evidence points to his being untruthful. Worthless POS State? Troll on little fella! If Montana is worth anything, I'm not sure what it is. It's basically Wyoming without the class. What evidence that doesn't come from World Daily News or one of your other sad websites points to him not being truthful? =Bob Troll on Squirt! |
|
|
|
Post by 78aztec82 on Jan 1, 2012 16:10:20 GMT -8
Again, you miss the point. It is not what he is, but what he claims to be. Lots of evidence points to his being untruthful. Worthless POS State? Troll on little fella! If Montana is worth anything, I'm not sure what it is. It's basically Wyoming without the class. What evidence that doesn't come from World Daily News or one of your other sad websites points to him not being truthful? =Bob What do You know of Montana or Wyoming? Ahh, as much as you know about the Mid-atlantic or the South, squat. You constantly bash these areas and the people therein yet you know Jack. Curious as to why? |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Jan 1, 2012 18:10:58 GMT -8
If Montana is worth anything, I'm not sure what it is. It's basically Wyoming without the class. What evidence that doesn't come from World Daily News or one of your other sad websites points to him not being truthful? =Bob What do You know of Montana or Wyoming? Ahh, as much as you know about the Mid-atlantic or the South, squat. You constantly bash these areas and the people therein yet you know Jack. Curious as to why? Jesus Stu, of course I bash those areas when I'm offering up some fresh bait. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Jan 1, 2012 18:12:54 GMT -8
If Montana is worth anything, I'm not sure what it is. It's basically Wyoming without the class. What evidence that doesn't come from World Daily News or one of your other sad websites points to him not being truthful? =Bob Troll on Squirt! The comments on Montana were certainly meant as a troll, but how about backing up your statement that "lots of evidence" is there that he's untruthful? =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 2, 2012 13:49:10 GMT -8
The comments on Montana were certainly meant as a troll, but how about backing up your statement that "lots of evidence" is there that he's untruthful? =Bob Here is one link. Do a search on "list obama lies" and pick any number of references. |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Jan 2, 2012 19:20:00 GMT -8
I see. So this country demands that every "leader" we have must meet a religious test and must be a "Christian". You are arguing theocracy Pooh. You are arguing that there should be a religious test when it comes to elections. This doesn't surprise me given the worthless POS state you come from, but it does surprise me that you'd offer such a ridiculous argument. =Bob Again, you miss the point. It is not what he is, but what he claims to be. Lots of evidence points to his being untruthful. Again you offer the "lots of evidence" argument without offering that "evidence. Please tell us what the "evidence" is based upon reliable sources. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 3, 2012 14:27:30 GMT -8
Again, you miss the point. It is not what he is, but what he claims to be. Lots of evidence points to his being untruthful. Again you offer the "lots of evidence" argument without offering that "evidence. Please tell us what the "evidence" is based upon reliable sources. =Bob I repeat. obamalies.net/list-of-liesHere is one link. Do a search on "list obama lies" and pick any number of references. |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Jan 3, 2012 18:42:49 GMT -8
The comments on Montana were certainly meant as a troll, but how about backing up your statement that "lots of evidence" is there that he's untruthful? =Bob Here is one link. Do a search on "list obama lies" and pick any number of references. Well, let's see. I ask you for a reference and you give me some right-wing website. I didn't bother with all of it, but let's use this for an example: A spokeswoman for Aetna confirmed Monday that the insurer will no longer sell new individual-market health insurance policies in Colorado and will terminate current policies held by state residents no later than July 31, 2012.
The change represents Aetna’s third major recent pull-back on health-insurance offerings in Colorado. The Hartford, Conn.-based company announced in the second half of 2010 that it will also stop selling new small-group and child-only individual-market policies.
Anjie Coplin, Aetna’s regional director of communications, did not specify in an email to the Denver Business Journal why the company had decided to end its presence in Colorado’s individual health market.
And in a Dec. 21 letter to the Colorado Division of Insurance, Aetna General Counsel Mary Anderson said that Aetna “can no longer meet the needs of its customers while remaining competitive in the Colorado individual health insurance market.”
Insurers have complained that federal health care reform has made offering their product more expensive. Major changes have included the end of lifetime coverage limits, a ban on rejecting policies to children because of pre-existing conditions and a requirement that 80 percent of individual health policy premiums must go to health care rather than to the companies.Given that the individual mandate doesn't go into effect until 2014, it seems to me this is simply a ploy by the insurance companies to get Colorado residents to support repeal. Besides, the last paragraph tells the story. The insurance companies managed to kill government health care and now they're doing this in order to kill other sections they don't like. Obama didn't lie - the law allows people to keep their insurance but it does nothing to stop Aetna and other companies to just walk away in a cynical attempt to force states to support repeal. Will those insurance companies just go out of the health care insurance business in every state? Fat chance. Seriously Pooh, when you offer this sort of nonsense as "proof", you seriously diminish yourself because it is so easily debunked. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 4, 2012 17:57:19 GMT -8
Well, let's see. I ask you for a reference and you give me some right-wing website. I didn't bother with all of it, but let's use this for an example: A spokeswoman for Aetna confirmed Monday that the insurer will no longer sell new individual-market health insurance policies in Colorado and will terminate current policies held by state residents no later than July 31, 2012.
The change represents Aetna’s third major recent pull-back on health-insurance offerings in Colorado. The Hartford, Conn.-based company announced in the second half of 2010 that it will also stop selling new small-group and child-only individual-market policies.
Anjie Coplin, Aetna’s regional director of communications, did not specify in an email to the Denver Business Journal why the company had decided to end its presence in Colorado’s individual health market.
And in a Dec. 21 letter to the Colorado Division of Insurance, Aetna General Counsel Mary Anderson said that Aetna “can no longer meet the needs of its customers while remaining competitive in the Colorado individual health insurance market.”
Insurers have complained that federal health care reform has made offering their product more expensive. Major changes have included the end of lifetime coverage limits, a ban on rejecting policies to children because of pre-existing conditions and a requirement that 80 percent of individual health policy premiums must go to health care rather than to the companies.Given that the individual mandate doesn't go into effect until 2014, it seems to me this is simply a ploy by the insurance companies to get Colorado residents to support repeal. Besides, the last paragraph tells the story. The insurance companies managed to kill government health care and now they're doing this in order to kill other sections they don't like. Obama didn't lie - the law allows people to keep their insurance but it does nothing to stop Aetna and other companies to just walk away in a cynical attempt to force states to support repeal. Will those insurance companies just go out of the health care insurance business in every state? Fat chance. Seriously Pooh, when you offer this sort of nonsense as "proof", you seriously diminish yourself because it is so easily debunked. =Bob I did not give only one web site. I gave you terms to search on as well. You are just yapping at the moon. |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Jan 9, 2012 20:29:05 GMT -8
Well, let's see. I ask you for a reference and you give me some right-wing website. I didn't bother with all of it, but let's use this for an example: A spokeswoman for Aetna confirmed Monday that the insurer will no longer sell new individual-market health insurance policies in Colorado and will terminate current policies held by state residents no later than July 31, 2012.
The change represents Aetna’s third major recent pull-back on health-insurance offerings in Colorado. The Hartford, Conn.-based company announced in the second half of 2010 that it will also stop selling new small-group and child-only individual-market policies.
Anjie Coplin, Aetna’s regional director of communications, did not specify in an email to the Denver Business Journal why the company had decided to end its presence in Colorado’s individual health market.
And in a Dec. 21 letter to the Colorado Division of Insurance, Aetna General Counsel Mary Anderson said that Aetna “can no longer meet the needs of its customers while remaining competitive in the Colorado individual health insurance market.”
Insurers have complained that federal health care reform has made offering their product more expensive. Major changes have included the end of lifetime coverage limits, a ban on rejecting policies to children because of pre-existing conditions and a requirement that 80 percent of individual health policy premiums must go to health care rather than to the companies.Given that the individual mandate doesn't go into effect until 2014, it seems to me this is simply a ploy by the insurance companies to get Colorado residents to support repeal. Besides, the last paragraph tells the story. The insurance companies managed to kill government health care and now they're doing this in order to kill other sections they don't like. Obama didn't lie - the law allows people to keep their insurance but it does nothing to stop Aetna and other companies to just walk away in a cynical attempt to force states to support repeal. Will those insurance companies just go out of the health care insurance business in every state? Fat chance. Seriously Pooh, when you offer this sort of nonsense as "proof", you seriously diminish yourself because it is so easily debunked. =Bob I did not give only one web site. I gave you terms to search on as well. You are just yapping at the moon. YAWN. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 10, 2012 14:34:40 GMT -8
I did not give only one web site. I gave you terms to search on as well. You are just yapping at the moon. YAWN. =Bob Get some sleep before you "pass out" and hurt yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Jan 13, 2012 17:35:45 GMT -8
Well, let's see. I ask you for a reference and you give me some right-wing website. I didn't bother with all of it, but let's use this for an example: A spokeswoman for Aetna confirmed Monday that the insurer will no longer sell new individual-market health insurance policies in Colorado and will terminate current policies held by state residents no later than July 31, 2012.
The change represents Aetna’s third major recent pull-back on health-insurance offerings in Colorado. The Hartford, Conn.-based company announced in the second half of 2010 that it will also stop selling new small-group and child-only individual-market policies.
Anjie Coplin, Aetna’s regional director of communications, did not specify in an email to the Denver Business Journal why the company had decided to end its presence in Colorado’s individual health market.
And in a Dec. 21 letter to the Colorado Division of Insurance, Aetna General Counsel Mary Anderson said that Aetna “can no longer meet the needs of its customers while remaining competitive in the Colorado individual health insurance market.”
Insurers have complained that federal health care reform has made offering their product more expensive. Major changes have included the end of lifetime coverage limits, a ban on rejecting policies to children because of pre-existing conditions and a requirement that 80 percent of individual health policy premiums must go to health care rather than to the companies.Given that the individual mandate doesn't go into effect until 2014, it seems to me this is simply a ploy by the insurance companies to get Colorado residents to support repeal. Besides, the last paragraph tells the story. The insurance companies managed to kill government health care and now they're doing this in order to kill other sections they don't like. Obama didn't lie - the law allows people to keep their insurance but it does nothing to stop Aetna and other companies to just walk away in a cynical attempt to force states to support repeal. Will those insurance companies just go out of the health care insurance business in every state? Fat chance. Seriously Pooh, when you offer this sort of nonsense as "proof", you seriously diminish yourself because it is so easily debunked. =Bob I did not give only one web site. I gave you terms to search on as well. You are just yapping at the moon. I'm sorry, Bunky, but you did offer only one website. Really, you gave me "terms to search on"? Do you have any clue how my thesis chair would have responded if I had offered him a reference that gave him "terms to search on"? Pooh, you are very intelligent and I won't denigrate your lack of education but you really need to understand how it works. Trolling is always fun but sooner or later you need to offer something approaching decent references if you want to be taken seriously. But then again, I assume you don't care to be taken seriously - that's a failing. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 14, 2012 7:55:29 GMT -8
I did not give only one web site. I gave you terms to search on as well. You are just yapping at the moon. I'm sorry, Bunky, but you did offer only one website. Really, you gave me "terms to search on"? Do you have any clue how my thesis chair would have responded if I had offered him a reference that gave him "terms to search on"? Pooh, you are very intelligent and I won't denigrate your lack of education but you really need to understand how it works. Trolling is always fun but sooner or later you need to offer something approaching decent references if you want to be taken seriously. But then again, I assume you don't care to be taken seriously - that's a failing. =Bob Well, I have to admit that I did offer only one web site, but you showed you were too lazy or waisted to search the terms given to allow you to see all the other sources. Your thesis chair must have been an idiot as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Jan 15, 2012 19:16:14 GMT -8
I'm sorry, Bunky, but you did offer only one website. Really, you gave me "terms to search on"? Do you have any clue how my thesis chair would have responded if I had offered him a reference that gave him "terms to search on"? Pooh, you are very intelligent and I won't denigrate your lack of education but you really need to understand how it works. Trolling is always fun but sooner or later you need to offer something approaching decent references if you want to be taken seriously. But then again, I assume you don't care to be taken seriously - that's a failing. =Bob Well, I have to admit that I did offer only one web site, but you showed you were too lazy or waisted to search the terms given to allow you to see all the other sources. Your thesis chair must have been an idiot as well. YAWN. you're response is totally bogus because you have no understanding of what it takes to get through graduate school. And let's face it, you have no farking idea of what it's like to get through a BA because you've never had to deal with anything. You are a pathetic old man who has never managed to achieve much of anything other than being someone who gained importance in the Nav. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 16, 2012 14:03:09 GMT -8
Well, I have to admit that I did offer only one web site, but you showed you were too lazy or waisted to search the terms given to allow you to see all the other sources. Your thesis chair must have been an idiot as well. YAWN. you're response is totally bogus because you have no understanding of what it takes to get through graduate school. And let's face it, you have no farking idea of what it's like to get through a BA because you've never had to deal with anything. You are a pathetic old man who has never managed to achieve much of anything other than being someone who gained importance in the Nav. =Bob Troll on little fella. You might want to tell us what good your Grad Degree has done you. |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Jan 16, 2012 21:51:47 GMT -8
I can't read through any more of you guy's back and forth bitching.
But the title of this thread is what is wrong with many religious Americans.
|
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Jan 17, 2012 16:43:12 GMT -8
I can't read through any more of you guy's back and forth bitching. But the title of this thread is what is wrong with many religious Americans. Can we have a forum for just Win vs. =Bob? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 17, 2012 16:56:49 GMT -8
I can't read through any more of you guy's back and forth bitching. But the title of this thread is what is wrong with many religious Americans. It is called petty bickering and not bitching.  |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jan 17, 2012 16:58:44 GMT -8
I can't read through any more of you guy's back and forth bitching. But the title of this thread is what is wrong with many religious Americans. Can we have a forum for just Win vs. =Bob? I don't think it would be much fun unless you include you, Aztec70 and some other liberal dimwits. |
|
