|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 4, 2011 21:50:04 GMT -8
Somehow I think that against Obama, that is not a disadvantage!  That spelling deal was not a dig at you as much as genuine wonder at what Obama would do with a two or three syllable word. First and foremost, Happy Independence Day to the USA and to all of my Aztec Brethren! Now, Win, what is is about being President of Harvard Law Review that escapes you? That is not chopped liver and is not bestowed on anyone incapable of intelligent thought and/or debate. In any case, let's all hope it is Bachmann so we get the chance to keep score. Can you point to something that Obama wrote for Harvard Law review?  He did nothing! |
|
|
|
Post by azdick on Jul 6, 2011 9:29:31 GMT -8
First and foremost, Happy Independence Day to the USA and to all of my Aztec Brethren! Now, Win, what is is about being President of Harvard Law Review that escapes you? That is not chopped liver and is not bestowed on anyone incapable of intelligent thought and/or debate. In any case, let's all hope it is Bachmann so we get the chance to keep score. Can you point to something that Obama wrote for Harvard Law review? He did nothing! Did I say something about publishing? Being President of HLR is mostly a leadership and administrative role - directing others about what to write and review. My point is that you don't land that position without having the necessary skills: www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11257.htmlYou can get away with a lot of implication and innuendo, Win, but don't make Obama out to be stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 6, 2011 12:43:09 GMT -8
Can you point to something that Obama wrote for Harvard Law review? He did nothing! Did I say something about publishing? Being President of HLR is mostly a leadership and administrative role - directing others about what to write and review. My point is that you don't land that position without having the necessary skills: www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11257.htmlYou can get away with a lot of implication and innuendo, Win, but don't make Obama out to be stupid. I don't think Obama is stupid in the generally accepted meaning of the word. He has accomplished near nothing in his life when compared to most politicians. His biggest accomplishment is hiding his record. |
|
|
|
Post by azdick on Jul 6, 2011 13:31:53 GMT -8
Did I say something about publishing? Being President of HLR is mostly a leadership and administrative role - directing others about what to write and review. My point is that you don't land that position without having the necessary skills: www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11257.htmlYou can get away with a lot of implication and innuendo, Win, but don't make Obama out to be stupid. I don't think Obama is stupid in the generally accepted meaning of the word. He has accomplished near nothing in his life when compared to most politicians. His biggest accomplishment is hiding his record. Compared to Dubya he's Thomas Jefferson. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 6, 2011 15:06:22 GMT -8
I don't think Obama is stupid in the generally accepted meaning of the word. He has accomplished near nothing in his life when compared to most politicians. His biggest accomplishment is hiding his record. Compared to Dubya he's Thomas Jefferson. I would ask you to document any "real" Obama accomplishment. Obama can't document anything that even approaches the rather modest resume of Kenny Allen let alone "Dubya". |
|
|
|
Post by azdick on Jul 7, 2011 9:30:04 GMT -8
Compared to Dubya he's Thomas Jefferson. I would ask you to document any "real" Obama accomplishment. Obama can't document anything that even approaches the rather modest resume of Kenny Allen let alone "Dubya". Why is it that, when referencing Obama, you constantly allude to apes and monkeys? Do you do it just to irritate Obama supporters, or, could it be, that you are really that racist? The more you do it, the more convinced I am that it is the latter and not the former. What great accomplishments did Dubya have? Starting two wars and then pretending there was no cost to them? So yes, he accomplished the destruction of the economy, no doubt about that. Overseeing the greatest transfer of wealth from poor and middle class to the rich, in our economic history? No Child Left Behind, for which some teachers apparently feel they have to "fix" student scores to keep their school doors open? Having the Justice Department rewrite torture rules so as to avoid being judged a war criminal? Oh yeah, Dubya was full of accomplishments! No doubt about it, one of the greats! Listen, my friend, history books will not treat kindly the Dubya era. The book is still open on Obama. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 7, 2011 11:24:31 GMT -8
I would ask you to document any "real" Obama accomplishment. Obama can't document anything that even approaches the rather modest resume of Kenny Allen let alone "Dubya". Why is it that, when referencing Obama, you constantly allude to apes and monkeys? Do you do it just to irritate Obama supporters, or, could it be, that you are really that racist? The more you do it, the more convinced I am that it is the latter and not the former. What great accomplishments did Dubya have? Starting two wars and then pretending there was no cost to them? So yes, he accomplished the destruction of the economy, no doubt about that. Overseeing the greatest transfer of wealth from poor and middle class to the rich, in our economic history? No Child Left Behind, for which some teachers apparently feel they have to "fix" student scores to keep their school doors open? Having the Justice Department rewrite torture rules so as to avoid being judged a war criminal? Oh yeah, Dubya was full of accomplishments! No doubt about it, one of the greats! Listen, my friend, history books will not treat kindly the Dubya era. The book is still open on Obama. Not racist at all, just trying to find a point of reference that is in the ball park. I have to laugh when I look at your list of Dubya faults. Most of what you say is pretty true, but largely exaggerated. The funny part is that Obama has run us much deeper in debt and may be trying to keep the economy down on purpose to build a voter base. You just have no idea of how evil this guy Obama is and what it will take to dig out of his deepening mess. The sorry book on Obama is still being written and each successive chapter gets worse. I know when a sore spot has been found when people protest with racist charges rather than try to address the facts. I loved Kenny Allen when he was a thorn in the side of the zoo and now he is regaining my admiration. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2011 12:04:53 GMT -8
The funny part is that Obama has run us much deeper in debt and may be trying to keep the economy down on purpose to build a voter base. You just have no idea of how evil this guy Obama is and what it will take to dig out of his deepening mess. . I am not even an Obama supporter and I know the above statement is untrue. I nearly responded in general earlier but decided not to but since you wrote the above this is what I have to say to all on this thread... Why do guys continue to argue with this win person? Nothing to be accomplished by it. His text continually has racial overtones and like many here, he only wants to convince everyone that his position is the only position. Political talk is only worthwhile if those in discussion are willing to see and understand both sides. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 7, 2011 12:19:26 GMT -8
The funny part is that Obama has run us much deeper in debt and may be trying to keep the economy down on purpose to build a voter base. You just have no idea of how evil this guy Obama is and what it will take to dig out of his deepening mess. . I am not even an Obama supporter and I know the above statement is untrue. I nearly responded in general earlier but decided not to but since you wrote the above this is what I have to say to all on this thread... Why do guys continue to argue with this win person? Nothing to be accomplished by it. His text continually has racial overtones and like many here, he only wants to convince everyone that his position is the only position. Political talk is only worthwhile if those in discussion are willing to see and understand both sides. Build your case! You should know the make up of my family before making charges that are not true. I support Ward Connerly and Herman Cain because of their positions on issues. I do not support Obama because he goes against everything that I stand for as representing the American way. You are guilty of believing what liberals want you to believe regardless of or in spite of your personal politics. |
|
|
|
Post by azdick on Jul 7, 2011 12:44:38 GMT -8
The funny part is that Obama has run us much deeper in debt and may be trying to keep the economy down on purpose to build a voter base. You just have no idea of how evil this guy Obama is and what it will take to dig out of his deepening mess. . I am not even an Obama supporter and I know the above statement is untrue. I nearly responded in general earlier but decided not to but since you wrote the above this is what I have to say to all on this thread... Why do guys continue to argue with this win person? Nothing to be accomplished by it. His text continually has racial overtones and like many here, he only wants to convince everyone that his position is the only position. Political talk is only worthwhile if those in discussion are willing to see and understand both sides. You make a good point - Win throws out these kinds of statement and they're just ridiculous. Thank of the absurdity of this concept - Obama wants to get the economy down as the means to winning a second term? Laughable. Last time I looked at American Presidential politics the voters were letting their wallets do the talking. The worst thing Obama could do relative to his reelection is to hold the economy down. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2011 12:50:11 GMT -8
I am not even an Obama supporter and I know the above statement is untrue. I nearly responded in general earlier but decided not to but since you wrote the above this is what I have to say to all on this thread... Why do guys continue to argue with this win person? Nothing to be accomplished by it. His text continually has racial overtones and like many here, he only wants to convince everyone that his position is the only position. Political talk is only worthwhile if those in discussion are willing to see and understand both sides. Build your case! You should know the make up of my family before making charges that are not true. I support Ward Connerly and Herman Cain because of their positions on issues. I do not support Obama because he goes against everything that I stand for as representing the American way. You are guilty of believing what liberals want you to believe regardless of or in spite of your personal politics. Mr. Win, I do not need to know your family make up to see the racial overtones in your post. They are there for me to see. As for building a case, where is your case? (No need to link one of your right wing sites which confirms your statement. They know as little as most on the subject.) And it is you who are guilty of believing what you want to believe. My first post says all that needs to be said. You are free to carry on the discussion with others. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 7, 2011 15:59:09 GMT -8
I am not even an Obama supporter and I know the above statement is untrue. I nearly responded in general earlier but decided not to but since you wrote the above this is what I have to say to all on this thread... Why do guys continue to argue with this win person? Nothing to be accomplished by it. His text continually has racial overtones and like many here, he only wants to convince everyone that his position is the only position. Political talk is only worthwhile if those in discussion are willing to see and understand both sides. You make a good point - Win throws out these kinds of statement and they're just ridiculous. Thank of the absurdity of this concept - Obama wants to get the economy down as the means to winning a second term? Laughable. Last time I looked at American Presidential politics the voters were letting their wallets do the talking. The worst thing Obama could do relative to his reelection is to hold the economy down. When Obama made it possible for 44 million to get Food Stamps rather than the 25 million before he was elected and ran the economy into the ground, he was building his voter base. You get more people dependent on your handouts and you gain reliable voters. Obama is about gaining power, redistributing wealth and bringing us down to the level of Europe where Socialism is the norm. Open your eyes. That is letting the wallets of the wrong people do the talking. |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Jul 7, 2011 18:48:06 GMT -8
Somehow I think that against Obama, that is not a disadvantage! That spelling deal was not a dig at you as much as genuine wonder at what Obama would do with a two or three syllable word. First and foremost, Happy Independence Day to the USA and to all of my Aztec Brethren! Now, Win, what is is about being President of Harvard Law Review that escapes you? That is not chopped liver and is not bestowed on anyone incapable of intelligent thought and/or debate. In any case, let's all hope it is Bachmann so we get the chance to keep score. The Christian Reich will win the next election. I base that upon my in depth study of history and American political vacillation. |
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Jul 7, 2011 18:51:10 GMT -8
First and foremost, Happy Independence Day to the USA and to all of my Aztec Brethren! Now, Win, what is is about being President of Harvard Law Review that escapes you? That is not chopped liver and is not bestowed on anyone incapable of intelligent thought and/or debate. In any case, let's all hope it is Bachmann so we get the chance to keep score. Can you point to something that Obama wrote for Harvard Law review? He did nothing! Dude, it is not WHAT YOU DO. Instead it is the IMAGE THAT YOU CREATE. I voted for Reagan twice. Was Reagan a cowboy? Hell, no! But he had most of us believing that he stood for Mom's Apple Pie, Baseball and Chevrolet. As long as we thought that about him, there was no way in hell that he could ever lose. You just liked him because he stood for everything that was right about America. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Jul 7, 2011 20:19:58 GMT -8
The funny part is that Obama has run us much deeper in debt and may be trying to keep the economy down on purpose to build a voter base. You just have no idea of how evil this guy Obama is and what it will take to dig out of his deepening mess. . I am not even an Obama supporter and I know the above statement is untrue. I nearly responded in general earlier but decided not to but since you wrote the above this is what I have to say to all on this thread... Why do guys continue to argue with this win person? Nothing to be accomplished by it. His text continually has racial overtones and like many here, he only wants to convince everyone that his position is the only position. Political talk is only worthwhile if those in discussion are willing to see and understand both sides. We do it because we feel sorry for aztecwin. He has grown old and has little to do but play golf and drink. We know he can only spout conservative shibboleths, nonetheless he is an Aztec, so we try to engage with him. |
|
|
|
Post by azdick on Jul 7, 2011 21:32:27 GMT -8
You make a good point - Win throws out these kinds of statement and they're just ridiculous. Thank of the absurdity of this concept - Obama wants to get the economy down as the means to winning a second term? Laughable. Last time I looked at American Presidential politics the voters were letting their wallets do the talking. The worst thing Obama could do relative to his reelection is to hold the economy down. When Obama made it possible for 44 million to get Food Stamps rather than the 25 million before he was elected and ran the economy into the ground, he was building his voter base. You get more people dependent on your handouts and you gain reliable voters. Obama is about gaining power, redistributing wealth and bringing us down to the level of Europe where Socialism is the norm. Open your eyes. That is letting the wallets of the wrong people do the talking. Yep, that's why he's making a deal with the Repubs to put Social Security and Medicare on the table, so he can curry favor with the Left. Come on, man.  |
|
|
|
Post by aztecsrule72001 on Jul 8, 2011 0:29:20 GMT -8
I'd be very surprised if Bachmann won. She's at her peak of popularity right now, but will drop just like Cain did. She's not even winning the polls in Iowa which should be her most favorable state (like it was for Huckabee).
It'll get tougher if Palin (unlikely) or Perry (50-50) decides to run.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 8, 2011 11:21:25 GMT -8
I am not even an Obama supporter and I know the above statement is untrue. I nearly responded in general earlier but decided not to but since you wrote the above this is what I have to say to all on this thread... Why do guys continue to argue with this win person? Nothing to be accomplished by it. His text continually has racial overtones and like many here, he only wants to convince everyone that his position is the only position. Political talk is only worthwhile if those in discussion are willing to see and understand both sides. We do it because we feel sorry for aztecwin. He has grown old and has little to do but play golf and drink. We know he can only spout conservative shibboleths, nonetheless he is an Aztec, so we try to engage with him. Please keep it up! If you do decide to keep it up, please keep up! Play Golf, Drink, and support the Aztecs! Please don't forget my support of the Aztecs. Give to Conservative causes! That should not be left out. Laugh a liberals. That is a must inclusion. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 8, 2011 11:24:23 GMT -8
I'd be very surprised if Bachmann won. She's at her peak of popularity right now, but will drop just like Cain did. She's not even winning the polls in Iowa which should be her most favorable state (like it was for Huckabee). It'll get tougher if Palin (unlikely) or Perry (50-50) decides to run. There is a real chance that the eventual Republican nominee has not entered the picture yet. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecsrule72001 on Jul 8, 2011 13:34:18 GMT -8
I'd be very surprised if Bachmann won. She's at her peak of popularity right now, but will drop just like Cain did. She's not even winning the polls in Iowa which should be her most favorable state (like it was for Huckabee). It'll get tougher if Palin (unlikely) or Perry (50-50) decides to run. There is a real chance that the eventual Republican nominee has not entered the picture yet. Maybe wishful thinking? Not sure why so many like the former liberal Perry. |
|
He did nothing!
