|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on May 16, 2011 15:26:41 GMT -8
Homophobe alert.  What do you mean? Just because he is wearing those twinkle toes shoes? He could be straight.  Homophobe Jr. Mr. Win? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on May 16, 2011 16:07:06 GMT -8
Well..if Maddow and Beck enter the ultimate fighting cage, my money is on Maddow to come out!  Why would that make him "come out"? He beats the "dog water" out of Beck for sure but I can't see how that would make him want to "come out". |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on May 16, 2011 16:08:35 GMT -8
What do you mean? Just because he is wearing those twinkle toes shoes? He could be straight. Homophobe Jr. Mr. Win? I must confess that I have no idea what you are getting at. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2011 16:14:10 GMT -8
Which would put him about 10% ahead of the moderates on MSNBC, including this dude  Homophobe alert. Just so we're clear; according to you, she's not trying to look like a dude and pointing out that she actually is trying to look like a dude is wrong? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2011 17:29:42 GMT -8
Just so we're clear; according to you, she's not trying to look like a dude and pointing out that she actually is trying to look like a dude is wrong? Yes. It's like pointing out that there is air. It's so obvious as to defy comment. Mos def homophobe alert. Why does it "defy" comment? I would think that assuming a girl that dresses all butch is in fact homosexual is more "homophobic" ( one of the more inane, laughable terms invented by lefty kooks by the way) Another clarification: Dude dresses like a girl =she/her Girl dresses like a dude = she/her |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on May 16, 2011 18:59:21 GMT -8
By the way, I understand politics well. It is, all too often, the use of lies and dirty tricks to help one's party, even if doing so harms the nation. In the present case, the Democrats are using and will continue to use any lie or carnard to convince the voters to vote for them. AzWm Um, no you don't. The above quoted paragraph shows that you don't because it's nothing more than an ideological statement. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on May 16, 2011 19:02:13 GMT -8
Which would put him about 10% ahead of the moderates on MSNBC, including this dude Homophobe alert. My guess is if Afan were allowed to watch her and her partner making it, he'd cream his jeans up one side and down the other. Afan seems to have a rather disturbing fascination with Rachel Maddow. =Bob |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2011 20:03:40 GMT -8
Homophobe alert. My guess is if Afan were allowed to watch her and her partner making it, he'd cream his jeans up one side and down the other. Afan seems to have a rather disturbing fascination with Rachel Maddow. =Bob Have to admit, it would be kinda hot!  But really, I'm more fascinated by the obviously damaged individuals that are the leading lights of the liberal commentariat. You've got Rick, who really seems to be having a difficult time with the whole gender identity thing. Billy Mahar, failed comedian and FIERCE drug addict. Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz, another failed comedian and self-loathing Jew. That other failed comedian on Comedy Central. Yet another failed comedian the retards in Minnesota actually elected to the Senate. That weird baseball card collector ,turned sportscaster turned really weird lefty nut case dude who looks a little like Ricks older brother. Jenine Garofolo, another failed comedian and bitter,bitter little person. That gaggle of screeching bimbos on The View. Rosie, who believes fire can't melt steel (Rocket surgeon). I could go on and on but fercrissakes, you libs like to talk about our kooks? You guys have a veritable Freak Show going on over on the left. Arianna Huffington? ARIANNA HUFFINGTON? hahahahahaha. What a bunch of L_O_S_E_R_S! |
|
|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on May 16, 2011 21:31:39 GMT -8
By the way, I understand politics well. It is, all too often, the use of lies and dirty tricks to help one's party, even if doing so harms the nation. In the present case, the Democrats are using and will continue to use any lie or canard to convince the voters to vote for them. AzWm Um, no you don't. The above quoted paragraph shows that you don't because it's nothing more than an ideological statement. =Bob Now I get it. Anyone who makes an ideological statement does not understand politics. Thanks for clearing up that thorny question. On the other hand, that leaves us pondering the fact that an awful lot of political heavyweights, based on what they say, must nevertheless not understand politics. AzWm |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on May 17, 2011 13:54:53 GMT -8
Homophobe alert. My guess is if Afan were allowed to watch her and her partner making it, he'd cream his jeans up one side and down the other. Afan seems to have a rather disturbing fascination with Rachel Maddow. =Bob "Allowed"? Where did you get permission? |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on May 17, 2011 17:44:18 GMT -8
My guess is if Afan were allowed to watch her and her partner making it, he'd cream his jeans up one side and down the other. Afan seems to have a rather disturbing fascination with Rachel Maddow. =Bob Have to admit, it would be kinda hot! But really, I'm more fascinated by the obviously damaged individuals that are the leading lights of the liberal commentariat. You've got Rick, who really seems to be having a difficult time with the whole gender identity thing. Billy Mahar, failed comedian and FIERCE drug addict. I see. Anyone who advocates legalizing pot is a "FIERCE drug addict."? Ron Paul would legalize all drugs. Does that make him a "FIERCE drug addict?" I swear to God, it is amazing how often arguing with you gives me flashbacks to the '60s when I was arguing with my father's generation. Rachel Maddow has no problem with her gender identity. She is openly lesbian and your opinion of how she dresses is ridiculous and suggests that you live in some '50s world where women should always wear dresses and be Beaver Cleaver's mom, vacuuming the living room while wearing pearls. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on May 17, 2011 17:56:12 GMT -8
Um, no you don't. The above quoted paragraph shows that you don't because it's nothing more than an ideological statement. =Bob Now I get it. Anyone who makes an ideological statement does not understand politics. Thanks for clearing up that thorny question. On the other hand, that leaves us pondering the fact that an awful lot of political heavyweights, based on what they say, must nevertheless not understand politics. AzWm Well Will, that's because you don't understand me. I certainly engage in ideological arguments but when I'm looking at the sheer politics of a given situation, ideology goes out the window. By nature or nurturing, most likely the latter, I'm an observer. If one is to really understand politics, one has to be an observer; we have to set aside our own political ideologies. To a great extent, that's damn difficult but I exist in world (and this is not bragging, just an observation of who I am, good or bad) that is pretty much dispassionate. I believe in our system of governing and I really don't worry about how this or that elected official is going to damage that system because that system has been in place for a rather long time. I wrote that you don't understand politics because you don't. I recognize that politics is on the same level as religion when it comes to bar room arguments, but unless you're willing to be dispassionate, you cannot really understand how it works. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on May 17, 2011 17:58:30 GMT -8
My guess is if Afan were allowed to watch her and her partner making it, he'd cream his jeans up one side and down the other. Afan seems to have a rather disturbing fascination with Rachel Maddow. =Bob "Allowed"? Where did you get permission? I don't need permission because I don't have the apparent fascination with Maddow that Afan has. Jeez Pooh, again I'll write it; your trolls are getting less and less coherent. =Bob |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2011 18:02:28 GMT -8
Now I get it. Anyone who makes an ideological statement does not understand politics. Thanks for clearing up that thorny question. On the other hand, that leaves us pondering the fact that an awful lot of political heavyweights, based on what they say, must nevertheless not understand politics. AzWm Well Will, that's because you don't understand me. I certainly engage in ideological arguments but when I'm looking at the sheer politics of a given situation, ideology goes out the window. By nature or nurturing, most likely the latter, I'm an observer. If one is to really understand politics, one has to be an observer; we have to set aside our own political ideologies. To a great extent, that's damn difficult but I exist in world (and this is not bragging, just an observation of who I am, good or bad) that is pretty much dispassionate. I believe in our system of governing and I really don't worry about how this or that elected official is going to damage that system because that system has been in place for a rather long time. I wrote that you don't understand politics because you don't. I recognize that politics is on the same level as religion when it comes to bar room arguments, but unless you're willing to be dispassionate, you cannot really understand how it works. =Bob Technically, she's a lesbian and a transvestite. If that doesn't scream gender identity issues, nothing does. |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on May 17, 2011 18:13:24 GMT -8
Well Will, that's because you don't understand me. I certainly engage in ideological arguments but when I'm looking at the sheer politics of a given situation, ideology goes out the window. By nature or nurturing, most likely the latter, I'm an observer. If one is to really understand politics, one has to be an observer; we have to set aside our own political ideologies. To a great extent, that's damn difficult but I exist in world (and this is not bragging, just an observation of who I am, good or bad) that is pretty much dispassionate. I believe in our system of governing and I really don't worry about how this or that elected official is going to damage that system because that system has been in place for a rather long time. I wrote that you don't understand politics because you don't. I recognize that politics is on the same level as religion when it comes to bar room arguments, but unless you're willing to be dispassionate, you cannot really understand how it works. =Bob Technically, she's a lesbian and a transvestite. If that doesn't scream gender identity issues, nothing does. I see. Because she sometimes wears overalls, she's a transvestite. I will ask it again - do you believe that women who wear pants are all lesbians? Do you demand that your wife never wears pants? Would you assume that if she does wear pants she's a closet lesbian? I'm sorry, but you are really making this far to easy for me. =Bob |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2011 19:30:15 GMT -8
Technically, she's a lesbian and a transvestite. If that doesn't scream gender identity issues, nothing does. I see. Because she sometimes wears overalls, she's a transvestite. I will ask it again - do you believe that women who wear pants are all lesbians? Do you demand that your wife never wears pants? Would you assume that if she does wear pants she's a closet lesbian? I'm sorry, but you are really making this far to easy for me. =Bob No, I believe women who dress like dudes are transvestites. Let me help you out. Chick in Pants Transvestite See bob! It's really pretty simple! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2011 21:34:10 GMT -8
Homophobe alert. My guess is if Afan were allowed to watch her and her partner making it, he'd cream his jeans up one side and down the other. I don't know, Bob. I'm certainly disinclined to defend afan and OTOH, I like watching hot chicks go at it as much as the next guy does. But somehow the thought of Maddow getting into it with her significant other does absolutely nothing for me so I have a difficult time thinking afan would get all hot and bothered over it either. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2011 21:38:31 GMT -8
Billy Mahar, failed comedian and FIERCE drug addict. I see. Anyone who advocates legalizing pot is a "FIERCE drug addict."? Ron Paul would legalize all drugs. Well, Ron Paul is a fierce phucktard. Thinks all drugs should be legalized. Thinks the US violated Pakistan's sovereignty by taking out Osama bin Laden and should be sanctioned by the world court. Etc. Etc. |
|
