|
|
Post by AccessBowlTime on Nov 26, 2018 10:53:02 GMT -8
Should Fanhood now be suspended simply for having brought back a 4-year-old thread which, having read it, was quite telling?
Should Fanhood now be suspended for having complained about removal of that thread?
Should I now be suspended for standing up for Fanhood?
|
|
|
|
Post by survalli on Nov 26, 2018 10:55:08 GMT -8
Should Fanhood now be suspended simply for having brought back a 4-year-old thread which, having read it, was quite telling? Should Fanhood now be suspended for having complained about removal of that thread? Should I now be suspended for standing up for Fanhood? Are you Fanhood? |
|
|
|
Post by FULL_MONTY on Nov 26, 2018 10:59:11 GMT -8
Should Fanhood now be suspended simply for having brought back a 4-year-old thread which, having read it, was quite telling? Should Fanhood now be suspended for having complained about removal of that thread? Should I now be suspended for standing up for Fanhood? What thread? |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Nov 26, 2018 11:00:28 GMT -8
He's suspended??
|
|
|
|
Post by ziggy on Nov 26, 2018 11:21:26 GMT -8
Should Fanhood now be suspended simply for having brought back a 4-year-old thread which, having read it, was quite telling? Should Fanhood now be suspended for having complained about removal of that thread? Should I now be suspended for standing up for Fanhood? What thread? It was a 4 year old thread about the team, Rocky and the coaching staff. Pretty much a rehash of what you see here today. When I first clicked on it I didn't realize it was that old until some of the players were mentioned. Once I realized that I moved on and didn't read it. Now that it's been deleted I wish I had. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Nov 26, 2018 11:25:37 GMT -8
Yeah, fanhood got himself suspended because he disagreed with the rules and didn't follow them.
Remember, you can criticize a post, but once you start going after the person who posted the comment you've crossed the line.
The purpose of this board is to discuss Aztec athletics, whether that's praise, criticism, or just providing information. It's not to criticize or mock other board members. All that does is derail threads and start flame wars. We had that years ago and we won't go there again.
|
|
|
|
Post by AccessBowlTime on Nov 26, 2018 11:30:10 GMT -8
A thread from November 2014 was briefly posted here this morning. It was four pages in length and very illuminating to me. Once I finished reading it, which obviously took a half hour or so, it was nowhere to be found. Then there was a one-page, one-post thread from fanhood which complained that an unexplained thread, presumably referring to that which I had read, had been inexplicably deleted. Then almost immediately the latter thread was deleted and to my knowledge, fanhood has now disappeared. I don't know fanhood was suspended but for the latter reason assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that he had been. And no, I'm not fanhood nor to my knowledge have I ever met the man for whatever that may be worth.
I'm not going to take the time to rescue the 4-year-old thread since it would presumably just be deleted again but in my opinion it contains significant grist for thought. I can only speculate that the basis for its deletion was inclusion of several comments made by a guy who the administrators banned for 2018. If so, shame on them again in my view.
|
|
|
|
Post by AccessBowlTime on Nov 26, 2018 11:36:42 GMT -8
Yeah, fanhood got himself suspended because he disagreed with the rules and didn't follow them. Remember, you can criticize a post, but once you start going after the person who posted the comment you've crossed the line. The purpose of this board is to discuss Aztec athletics, whether that's praise, criticism, or just providing information. It's not to criticize or mock other board members. All that does is derail threads and start flame wars. We had that years ago and we won't go there again. He violated the rules in what manner? I read the entire thread and it contained nothing which I know to be verboten. Considering that it contained no material from today, I will say that insofar as it might have contained criticism by fanhood of other posters, I did not see that. If that was the case, I would encourage you to bring back the thread with a simple deletion of the offending post as much contained therein was informational to me. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Nov 26, 2018 11:36:46 GMT -8
A thread from November 2014 was briefly posted here this morning. It was four pages in length and very illuminating to me. Once I finished reading it, which obviously took a half hour or so, it was nowhere to be found. Then there was a one-page, one-post thread from fanhood which complained that an unexplained thread, presumably referring to that which I had read, had been inexplicably deleted. Then almost immediately the latter thread was deleted and to my knowledge, fanhood has now disappeared. I don't know fanhood was suspended but for the latter reason assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that he had been. And no, I'm not fanhood nor to my knowledge have I ever met the man for whatever that may be worth. I'm not going to take the time to rescue the 4-year-old thread since it would presumably just be deleted again but in my opinion it contains significant grist for thought. I can only speculate that the basis for its deletion was inclusion of several comments made by a guy who the administrators banned for 2018. If so, shame on them again in my view. Fanhood has a string of warnings for rules violations (include outright personal insults) going back to 2014. We had been discussing issues by PM, but he still wouldn't follow the forum rules. He was given several chances, but he continued to break forum rules. That's on him. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2018 12:39:03 GMT -8
Fans can disagree on the state and future of Aztecs athletics without referring to posters as “pathetic” or “stupid.”
|
|
|
|
Post by azteca on Nov 26, 2018 13:07:52 GMT -8
Should Fanhood now be suspended simply for having brought back a 4-year-old thread which, having read it, was quite telling? Should Fanhood now be suspended for having complained about removal of that thread? Should I now be suspended for standing up for Fanhood? IMHO, I have been a member of this board and several others prior. I’m beginning to wonder if it is close to ending it’s usefulness. While I agree insults and name calling shouldn’t be allowed, I also am wondering if a certain mod should be allowed to say the same thing over and over about the Aztec’s OC in the Hawaii thread with very little substance. Isn’t that another definition of “trolling”? Regardless of whether the performance of that OC is not effective is it necessary to post the same thing again and again without any new or additional substance? |
|
|
|
Post by McQuervo on Nov 26, 2018 14:22:42 GMT -8
This is worse than those "Divorced Whores from Orange County" show.
Be happy we had a winning season and if he illustrated something of value 4 years prior, consider his thought and insight validated.
Go FH!
|
|
|
|
Post by MarshallU on Nov 26, 2018 15:21:24 GMT -8
Should Fanhood now be suspended simply for having brought back a 4-year-old thread which, having read it, was quite telling? Should Fanhood now be suspended for having complained about removal of that thread? Should I now be suspended for standing up for Fanhood? IMHO, I have been a member of this board and several others prior. I’m beginning to wonder if it is close to ending it’s usefulness. While I agree insults and name calling shouldn’t be allowed, I also am wondering if a certain mod should be allowed to say the same thing over and over about the Aztec’s OC in the Hawaii thread with very little substance. Isn’t that another definition of “trolling”? Regardless of whether the performance of that OC is not effective is it necessary to post the same thing again and again without any new or additional substance? 153.75% agree!!! This board has become just an occasional "check out the car wreck" viewing for me. No real information and thoughts are rarely if ever exchanged. It's only personal threats and aztec fans versus aztec fans shouting matches. |
|
