|
Post by fisher1fan on Nov 2, 2018 12:30:01 GMT -8
How is Duncan Hunter indicted and still has the possibility to win?
Vote for Ammar, if you can.
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Nov 2, 2018 12:50:05 GMT -8
How is Duncan Hunter indicted and still has the possibility to win? Vote for Ammar, if you can. Do Republicans really like crooks and racists?
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Nov 2, 2018 19:51:49 GMT -8
How is Duncan Hunter indicted and still has the possibility to win? Vote for Ammar, if you can. Do Republicans really like crooks and racists? No. But Democrats sure do. They have a long, long history of both.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 3, 2018 7:14:15 GMT -8
How can anyone associating themselves with the party of Feinstein & Blum, for example, and their corruption and millions and millions of dollars in aggrandizement at the expense of the tax payer give a rats a$$ about the minor faux paus of Duncan Hunter and be taken seriously? Hunter is dirt poor by modern political standards and anything he might have done is likely due to his avoidance of and inexperience with the megga corruption other pols have mastered.
"You can't get rich in politics unless you're a crook." Harry S Truman.
And if you are going go on about "what if it was an average Joe like us? Would we be allowed to break a technicality of the law?" and then say "Excuse me, I'm off to a rally to support the rights of illegal aliens, to make sure they don't get deported after they violated our laws, to make sure nothing happens when they use someone elses SSN for E-Verify, yada, yada, yada.
Is it the rule of law for you or not?
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Nov 3, 2018 15:41:12 GMT -8
This country is gonna get a whole lot worse before it gets better.
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Nov 3, 2018 17:09:32 GMT -8
Worse for Democrats probably.
|
|
|
Post by fisher1fan on Nov 4, 2018 0:28:17 GMT -8
How can anyone associating themselves with the party of Feinstein & Blum, for example, and their corruption and millions and millions of dollars in aggrandizement at the expense of the tax payer give a rats a$$ about the minor faux paus of Duncan Hunter and be taken seriously? Hunter is dirt poor by modern political standards and anything he might have done is likely due to his avoidance of and inexperience with the megga corruption other pols have mastered. "You can't get rich in politics unless you're a crook." Harry S Truman. And if you are going go on about "what if it was an average Joe like us? Would we be allowed to break a technicality of the law?" and then say "Excuse me, I'm off to a rally to support the rights of illegal aliens, to make sure they don't get deported after they violated our laws, to make sure nothing happens when they use someone elses SSN for E-Verify, yada, yada, yada. Is it the rule of law for you or not? Lots of words, great job on excusing corruption and switching subjects a lot to confusion the issue. Hunter vs Campa Najjar. Hunter is indicted and removed from committees by Paul Ryan. When Paul Ryan turns on a Rep, they are a sinking ship.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 4, 2018 17:59:05 GMT -8
How can anyone associating themselves with the party of Feinstein & Blum, for example, and their corruption and millions and millions of dollars in aggrandizement at the expense of the tax payer give a rats a$$ about the minor faux paus of Duncan Hunter and be taken seriously? Hunter is dirt poor by modern political standards and anything he might have done is likely due to his avoidance of and inexperience with the megga corruption other pols have mastered. "You can't get rich in politics unless you're a crook." Harry S Truman. And if you are going go on about "what if it was an average Joe like us? Would we be allowed to break a technicality of the law?" and then say "Excuse me, I'm off to a rally to support the rights of illegal aliens, to make sure they don't get deported after they violated our laws, to make sure nothing happens when they use someone elses SSN for E-Verify, yada, yada, yada. Is it the rule of law for you or not? Lots of words, great job on excusing corruption and switching subjects a lot to confusion the issue. Hunter vs Campa Najjar. Hunter is indicted and removed from committees by Paul Ryan. When Paul Ryan turns on a Rep, they are a sinking ship. You do understand about the saga of Senator Ted Stevens, don't you? If you don't, let me remind you that a corrupt Justice Department actually convicted an innocent man as they hid exculpatory evidence to railroad him during election season. And you don't have to look too far to see politically motivated DoJ and FBI lifers trying to please their Democrat overlords at every turn. It's not lost on me that a hapless Scooter Libby and Dinesh D'Souza go to jail but Hillary "I thought "C" was a paragraph number" Clinton and the corrupt Lois Lerner goes off scott free. Bruce Ohr and Sally Yates are poster children for the politically motivated DoJ lifer. Of course, those type of partisans only occur in DC, not the field offices (roll eyes)! So pardon me if I don't drool at the sound of an indictment in the current condition of our Federal legal bureaucracy.
|
|
|
Post by fisher1fan on Nov 4, 2018 18:52:35 GMT -8
Lots of words, great job on excusing corruption and switching subjects a lot to confusion the issue. Hunter vs Campa Najjar. Hunter is indicted and removed from committees by Paul Ryan. When Paul Ryan turns on a Rep, they are a sinking ship. You do understand about the saga of Senator Ted Stevens, don't you? If you don't, let me remind you that a corrupt Justice Department actually convicted an innocent man as they hid exculpatory evidence to railroad him during election season. And you don't have to look too far to see politically motivated DoJ and FBI lifers trying to please their Democrat overlords at every turn. It's not lost on me that a hapless Scooter Libby and Dinesh D'Souza go to jail but Hillary "I thought "C" was a paragraph number" Clinton and the corrupt Lois Lerner goes off scott free. Bruce Ohr and Sally Yates are poster children for the politically motivated DoJ lifer. Of course, those type of partisans only occur in DC, not the field offices (roll eyes)! So pardon me if I don't drool at the sound of an indictment in the current condition of our Federal legal bureaucracy. Nice switch of topics. None of that has to do with Duncan Hunter. Other people do good and bad things. Let’s stick on topic: House Speaker Paul Ryan said Tuesday evening that he would remove the congressman from all committee assignments for the time being, calling the charges against Hunter “deeply serious.” The congressman's lawyers said in 2017 that Hunter and his wife repaid the campaign about $60,000.
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Nov 4, 2018 19:50:16 GMT -8
Lots of words, great job on excusing corruption and switching subjects a lot to confusion the issue. Hunter vs Campa Najjar. Hunter is indicted and removed from committees by Paul Ryan. When Paul Ryan turns on a Rep, they are a sinking ship. You do understand about the saga of Senator Ted Stevens, don't you? If you don't, let me remind you that a corrupt Justice Department actually convicted an innocent man as they hid exculpatory evidence to railroad him during election season. And you don't have to look too far to see politically motivated DoJ and FBI lifers trying to please their Democrat overlords at every turn. It's not lost on me that a hapless Scooter Libby and Dinesh D'Souza go to jail but Hillary "I thought "C" was a paragraph number" Clinton and the corrupt Lois Lerner goes off scott free. Bruce Ohr and Sally Yates are poster children for the politically motivated DoJ lifer. Of course, those type of partisans only occur in DC, not the field offices (roll eyes)! So pardon me if I don't drool at the sound of an indictment in the current condition of our Federal legal bureaucracy. You legit live in a different universe. How do we fix whatever is so wrong with our politics that an indicted republican congressman comes up and the response is “the law enforcement community might be conspiring against him”...? How do we reason with that person?
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 4, 2018 21:27:56 GMT -8
You do understand about the saga of Senator Ted Stevens, don't you? If you don't, let me remind you that a corrupt Justice Department actually convicted an innocent man as they hid exculpatory evidence to railroad him during election season. And you don't have to look too far to see politically motivated DoJ and FBI lifers trying to please their Democrat overlords at every turn. It's not lost on me that a hapless Scooter Libby and Dinesh D'Souza go to jail but Hillary "I thought "C" was a paragraph number" Clinton and the corrupt Lois Lerner goes off scott free. Bruce Ohr and Sally Yates are poster children for the politically motivated DoJ lifer. Of course, those type of partisans only occur in DC, not the field offices (roll eyes)! So pardon me if I don't drool at the sound of an indictment in the current condition of our Federal legal bureaucracy. You legit live in a different universe. How do we fix whatever is so wrong with our politics that an indicted republican congressman comes up and the response is “the law enforcement community might be conspiring against him”...? How do we reason with that person? What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that Sen. Ted Stevens was falsely accused and was still tried and convicted by our DoJ? What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that personal political bias of Gov bureaucrats has obviously influenced their official actions against innocent US citizens? How do you reason with that person? How do you fix Government when its operation has been many times recently usurped for partisan purposes? Should we have no skepticism when it seems like it is occuring yet again right in our front yard? Or do we just hope againt hope that somehow our Government has "self-corrected" and is entirely just in what is now a hyper hyper partisan period? If so, I have a bridge for sale you might like...
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Nov 4, 2018 21:40:51 GMT -8
You legit live in a different universe. How do we fix whatever is so wrong with our politics that an indicted republican congressman comes up and the response is “the law enforcement community might be conspiring against him”...? How do we reason with that person? What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that Sen. Ted Stevens was falsely accused and was still tried and convicted by our DoJ? What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that personal political bias of Gov bureaucrats has obviously influenced their official actions against innocent US citizens? How do you reason with that person? How do you fix Government when its operation has been many times recently usurped for partisan purposes? Should we have no skepticism when it seems like it is occuring yet again right in our front yard? Or do we just hope againt hope that somehow our Government has "self-corrected" and is entirely just in what is now a hyper hyper partisan period? If so, I have a bridge for sale you might like... I’ve never seen a bigger collective group of victims that won. Like, what are you mad about? I swear it’s like you had ONE “Complain about Hillary for 8 Years” card to play and then she lost and now you have no idea what to do with your hands so you’re obsessed about the Deep State saving RomneyCare and Guatemalan ISIS coming to invade El Cajon and steal your water.
|
|
|
Post by fisher1fan on Nov 5, 2018 8:25:18 GMT -8
You legit live in a different universe. How do we fix whatever is so wrong with our politics that an indicted republican congressman comes up and the response is “the law enforcement community might be conspiring against him”...? How do we reason with that person? What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that Sen. Ted Stevens was falsely accused and was still tried and convicted by our DoJ? What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that personal political bias of Gov bureaucrats has obviously influenced their official actions against innocent US citizens? How do you reason with that person? How do you fix Government when its operation has been many times recently usurped for partisan purposes? Should we have no skepticism when it seems like it is occuring yet again right in our front yard? Or do we just hope againt hope that somehow our Government has "self-corrected" and is entirely just in what is now a hyper hyper partisan period? If so, I have a bridge for sale you might like... Are you able to stay on the topic of Duncan Hunter? Is that possible for you? Side stories don’t affect him. How about your respond about Hunter? Paul Ryan doesn’t support him, so this isn’t a partisan issue. He even repaid money admitting that he used funds incorrectly.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 5, 2018 8:28:15 GMT -8
What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that Sen. Ted Stevens was falsely accused and was still tried and convicted by our DoJ? What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that personal political bias of Gov bureaucrats has obviously influenced their official actions against innocent US citizens? How do you reason with that person? How do you fix Government when its operation has been many times recently usurped for partisan purposes? Should we have no skepticism when it seems like it is occuring yet again right in our front yard? Or do we just hope againt hope that somehow our Government has "self-corrected" and is entirely just in what is now a hyper hyper partisan period? If so, I have a bridge for sale you might like... Are you able to stay on the topic of Duncan Hunter? Is that possible for you? Side stories don’t affect him. How about your respond about Hunter? Paul Ryan doesn’t support him, so this isn’t a partisan issue. He even repaid money admitting that he used funds incorrectly. He commingled funds? You should have told me that first. Execute him!
|
|
|
Post by cmonaztecs on Nov 5, 2018 8:40:31 GMT -8
I'm thinking it's hung up in the courts so he hasn't been convicted yet. Just like Trump, he has over 500 ongoing law suits that he strings out and just settles with people he's swindled and never gets any jail time. But that's going to change as soon as we get control of the house they're going to start investigating him. Especially with that large Deuscthe Bank loan that bailed bailed him out and all the money laundering. We will see Justice.
|
|
|
Post by fisher1fan on Nov 5, 2018 9:17:45 GMT -8
Are you able to stay on the topic of Duncan Hunter? Is that possible for you? Side stories don’t affect him. How about your respond about Hunter? Paul Ryan doesn’t support him, so this isn’t a partisan issue. He even repaid money admitting that he used funds incorrectly. He commingled funds? You should have told me that first. Execute him! He broke laws. Got caught. Don’t try to diminish it. Maybe he should retain his job if he took 1/4 of a million dollars for personal issues. The republicans control ethics committee is investigating him. Theft isn’t a partisan issue.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 5, 2018 10:01:04 GMT -8
He commingled funds? You should have told me that first. Execute him! He broke laws. Got caught. Don’t try to diminish it. Maybe he should retain his job if he took 1/4 of a million dollars for personal issues. The republicans control ethics committee is investigating him. Theft isn’t a partisan issue. As I asked before, where is the demand for following and ENFORCING the rule of law when it comes to things not related to GOP politicians like illegal immigration, IRS scandal, Clintonistas, Spying on American for the Democrats, etc? Sure, slap his wrist like they do Rosie O'donnell for violating campaign finance law, for Rev Sharpton for tax evation, like Hillary and her server while claiming to be too stupid to live, etc.
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Nov 5, 2018 11:26:36 GMT -8
^They’ve been wound up so tightly over the course of so many years by the right wing media ecosphere that for quite awhile, they’ve been absolutely positive anyone who disagrees with them is nefariously breaking the law and they are so powerful that it isn’t even conspiracy, it’s all coverup.
Now they’re fully in power, with no checks, and it turns out that their guys are crooked, and quite provably so. Instead of dealing with what I’m sure are confused emotions and a realization that what they believe and have been told to believe might not be so truthful after all, cognitive dissonance and the furtherance of a comforting media bubble allows for widespread acceptance of absolutely batshit ideas and whataboutism.
It’s dangerous, and to what end, I don’t have any idea.
January 2019 - Trump murdered a Congressman-elect from Iowa so he couldn’t be sworn-in, we’ve got it on video and he did it at a campaign rally... “WHO CARES HAVE YOU SEEN THE CLINTON BODY COUNT?! Helllloooo Vincent Foster! I don’t want to talk about it until the deep state is cleaned out and we fully investigate Seth Rich and Pizzagate, THEN maybe we can talk about this Trump murder.”
|
|
|
Post by mactec on Nov 5, 2018 18:01:44 GMT -8
I always see people liken politics to sports, in that people pick a team and root for theirs to win no matter what.
But at least in sports, we have fans that stop cheering for players when they do something egregious. If sports were actually like politics, Kawhi Leonard could literally murder someone, and someone on AztecMesa would argue that we shouldn't care because OJ's murder was worse. Or because Hillary Clinton had a private email server.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Nov 5, 2018 18:25:46 GMT -8
What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that Sen. Ted Stevens was falsely accused and was still tried and convicted by our DoJ? What do you say to someone who ignores the fact that personal political bias of Gov bureaucrats has obviously influenced their official actions against innocent US citizens? How do you reason with that person? How do you fix Government when its operation has been many times recently usurped for partisan purposes? Should we have no skepticism when it seems like it is occuring yet again right in our front yard? Or do we just hope againt hope that somehow our Government has "self-corrected" and is entirely just in what is now a hyper hyper partisan period? If so, I have a bridge for sale you might like... Are you able to stay on the topic of Duncan Hunter? Is that possible for you? Side stories don’t affect him. How about your respond about Hunter? Paul Ryan doesn’t support him, so this isn’t a partisan issue. He even repaid money admitting that he used funds incorrectly. This guy has nothing left. Trump killed the moral majority and the tea party. Other than Sean Hannity and Alex Jones talking points ...he brings nothing to the table.
|
|