|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Sept 20, 2018 7:59:01 GMT -8
So the New York Times features an anonymous editorial from a presumed Government Employee within the Trump Administration who, by analysis, must have lied on his/her application to serve in the Admin, lied to the people who interviewed him/her, lies to some amount of their colleagues and co-workers on a daily basis and all to thwart Trump's agenda. And this person says he/she is not alone in this sort of subterfuge.
So Bob Woodward gets info from presumed "reliable" sources within the Administration that paints a wholly negative picture and is somehow surprised and indignant when the Principals cited say his references to their statements given to Woodward by way of 3rd parties within the Administration are lies. Imagine that?
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Sept 20, 2018 16:03:15 GMT -8
Number one.. Woodward has tapes of those who deny the interaction. Number two.. so you want the "Deep State" replaced by Manafort, Flynn, Cohen (if they hadn't been busted) and on and on. What do you call them.. The "Good Guys" looking out for the American citizen??
|
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Sept 20, 2018 17:30:25 GMT -8
Number one.. Woodward has tapes of those who deny the interaction. Number two.. so you want the "Deep State" replaced by Manafort, Flynn, Cohen (if they hadn't been busted) and on and on. What do you call them.. The "Good Guys" looking out for the American citizen?? I’d bet twenty bucks he’s a QAnon guy. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Sept 20, 2018 17:49:32 GMT -8
Number one.. Woodward has tapes of those who deny the interaction. Number two.. so you want the "Deep State" replaced by Manafort, Flynn, Cohen (if they hadn't been busted) and on and on. What do you call them.. The "Good Guys" looking out for the American citizen?? I’d bet twenty bucks he’s a QAnon guy. Definitely "Q" haha. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Sept 20, 2018 17:52:12 GMT -8
Number one.. Woodward has tapes of those who deny the interaction. Number two.. so you want the "Deep State" replaced by Manafort, Flynn, Cohen (if they hadn't been busted) and on and on. What do you call them.. The "Good Guys" looking out for the American citizen?? Funny we haven't heard any. If he had a recording of Mattis, for example, in direct contrast to his denial, we wouldn't be able see or hear anything else on CNN for days. I just reviewed Woodward's interview on Colbert and Woodward refers only to "sources" being recorded. Only recording I heard from Woodward was him talking to Trump and it was a big yawner about whether or not Trump would have given Woodward the time of day while writing his hit piece. It's like the Russian Conspiracy, if they had anything real, it would have long been out there for all to see. Manafort? I wouldn't have the slimeball James Carville or the mobster David Axelrod within 100 miles of real Gov responsibility if I were in charge but then it wasn't my call. The existence of Cohen or the trap the corrupt and partisan FBI set on Flynn does not give our Government employees the right to lie on the job and implement personal priorities over legally empowered policy and law. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Sept 20, 2018 17:55:48 GMT -8
Number one.. Woodward has tapes of those who deny the interaction. Number two.. so you want the "Deep State" replaced by Manafort, Flynn, Cohen (if they hadn't been busted) and on and on. What do you call them.. The "Good Guys" looking out for the American citizen?? Funny we haven't heard any. If he had a recording of Mattis, for example, in direct contrast to his denial, we wouldn't be able see or hear anything else on CNN for days. I just reviewed Woodward's interview on Colbert and Woodward refers only to "sources" being recorded. Only recording I heard from Woodward was him talking to Trump and it was a big yawner about whether or not Trump would have given Woodward the time of day while writing his hit piece. It's like the Russian Conspiracy, if they had anything real, it would have long been out there for all to see. Manafort? I wouldn't have the slimeball James Carville or the mobster David Axelrod within 100 miles of real Gov responsibility if I were in charge but then it wasn't my call. The existence of Cohen or the trap the corrupt and partisan FBI set on Flynn does not give our Government employees the right to lie on the job and implement personal priorities over legally empowered policy and law. haha...you just blew your cover... |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Sept 20, 2018 18:09:20 GMT -8
Funny we haven't heard any. If he had a recording of Mattis, for example, in direct contrast to his denial, we wouldn't be able see or hear anything else on CNN for days. I just reviewed Woodward's interview on Colbert and Woodward refers only to "sources" being recorded. Only recording I heard from Woodward was him talking to Trump and it was a big yawner about whether or not Trump would have given Woodward the time of day while writing his hit piece. It's like the Russian Conspiracy, if they had anything real, it would have long been out there for all to see. Manafort? I wouldn't have the slimeball James Carville or the mobster David Axelrod within 100 miles of real Gov responsibility if I were in charge but then it wasn't my call. The existence of Cohen or the trap the corrupt and partisan FBI set on Flynn does not give our Government employees the right to lie on the job and implement personal priorities over legally empowered policy and law. haha...you just blew your cover... Oh clearly ?? |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Sept 20, 2018 18:50:58 GMT -8
Number one.. Woodward has tapes of those who deny the interaction. Number two.. so you want the "Deep State" replaced by Manafort, Flynn, Cohen (if they hadn't been busted) and on and on. What do you call them.. The "Good Guys" looking out for the American citizen?? Funny we haven't heard any. If he had a recording of Mattis, for example, in direct contrast to his denial, we wouldn't be able see or hear anything else on CNN for days. I just reviewed Woodward's interview on Colbert and Woodward refers only to "sources" being recorded. Only recording I heard from Woodward was him talking to Trump and it was a big yawner about whether or not Trump would have given Woodward the time of day while writing his hit piece. It's like the Russian Conspiracy, if they had anything real, it would have long been out there for all to see. Manafort? I wouldn't have the slimeball James Carville or the mobster David Axelrod within 100 miles of real Gov responsibility if I were in charge but then it wasn't my call. The existence of Cohen or the trap the corrupt and partisan FBI set on Flynn does not give our Government employees the right to lie on the job and implement personal priorities over legally empowered policy and law.  not fake. |
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Sept 20, 2018 18:56:49 GMT -8
haha...you just blew your cover... Oh clearly ?? Honestly if y’all would just admit that this crooked reality tv show clown is in fact a crooked reality tv show clown, but at least he lets other people push through your backwardass far right policies with disregard, we’d respect you a lot more. Trying to convince yourself this clown isn’t a clown is what makes mocking you all so easy. After the confirmation that drumpf’s got a little baby mushroom, the most realistic scenario for next week is a bootlegged Twitter dck pic from @potus to distract from cocaine Mitch pushing through a rapist to the SCOTUS. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Sept 20, 2018 21:27:33 GMT -8
Honestly if y’all would just admit that this crooked reality tv show clown is in fact a crooked reality tv show clown, but at least he lets other people push through your backwardass far right policies with disregard, we’d respect you a lot more. Trying to convince yourself this clown isn’t a clown is what makes mocking you all so easy. After the confirmation that drumpf’s got a little baby mushroom, the most realistic scenario for next week is a bootlegged Twitter dck pic from @potus to distract from cocaine Mitch pushing through a rapist to the SCOTUS. Do you even hear yourself? Have you ever turned on the TV and seen and listened to our politicians? Do you know how many of them are, to some extent, corrupt, dishonest, phony, clueless, two-faced, narcissistic, ambitious, stupid, feeble, lecherous, perverted, ignorant, liars, inept, etc, etc, etc.? A Rapist was our President from 1992 to 2000 and I doubt you gave a rats a$$ about that fact. The last President was a buffoon getting his head handed to him in foreign policy, national security, immigration policy, medical policy (have you had to pay your own insurance premium lately?), trade, etc, etc. Who cares that he was eloquent? To cite a phrase "what different does it make" that he was an eloquent clueless clown? And then there is the blatant corruption of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA that he fostered. He knew the Russians were messing with us for years and the best he could muster was a ham fisted frame up of his political enemy? And what does it say about Hillary and the Democrats when they couldn't win with the power of the Executive Branch putting their weight on the scale and still lost? It comes down to policies. The Democrat's policies suck. And the 16 or 17 GOP challengers were not offering that much of a difference and that is why the mid-western Democrats elected Donald Trump. His policies are not perfect but light years better than the clueless clown he ran against. And we are seeing good results from thise policies. I understand the left is all about emotion, style and optics but give me a crass obnoxious business man who might be the only way to change the direction of the Titanic of State, at least for some areas. When the politicians (noted initially) abhor the man, he must be doing something right. |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Sept 20, 2018 21:30:31 GMT -8
Honestly if y’all would just admit that this crooked reality tv show clown is in fact a crooked reality tv show clown, but at least he lets other people push through your backwardass far right policies with disregard, we’d respect you a lot more. Trying to convince yourself this clown isn’t a clown is what makes mocking you all so easy. After the confirmation that drumpf’s got a little baby mushroom, the most realistic scenario for next week is a bootlegged Twitter dck pic from @potus to distract from cocaine Mitch pushing through a rapist to the SCOTUS. Do you even hear yourself? Have you ever turned on the TV and seen and listened to our politicians? Do you know how many of them are, to some extent, corrupt, dishonest, phony, clueless, two-faced, narcissistic, ambitious, stupid, feeble, lecherous, perverted, ignorant, liars, inept, etc, etc, etc.? A Rapist was our President from 1992 to 2000 and I doubt you gave a rats a$$ about that fact. The last President was a buffoon getting his head handed to him in foreign policy, national security, immigration policy, medical policy (have you had to pay your own insurance premium lately?), trade, etc, etc. Who cares that he was eloquent? To cite a phrase "what different does it make" that he was an eloquent clueless clown? And then there is the blatant corruption of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA that he fostered. He knew the Russians were messing with us for years and the best he could muster was a ham fisted frame up of his political enemy? And what does it say about Hillary and the Democrats when they couldn't win with the power of the Executive Branch putting their weight on the scale and still lost? It comes down to policies. The Democrat's policies suck. And the 16 or 17 GOP challengers were not offering that much of a difference and that is why the mid-western Democrats elected Donald Trump. His policies are not perfect but light years better than the clueless clown he ran against. And we are seeing good results from thise policies. I understand the left is all about emotion, style and optics but give me a crass obnoxious business man who might be the only way to change the direction of the Titanic of State, at least for some areas. When the politicians (noted initially) abhor the man, he must be doing something right. I wouldn’t waste any more time on the left on this board. You just can’t talk to stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Sept 21, 2018 18:01:43 GMT -8
Honestly if y’all would just admit that this crooked reality tv show clown is in fact a crooked reality tv show clown, but at least he lets other people push through your backwardass far right policies with disregard, we’d respect you a lot more. Trying to convince yourself this clown isn’t a clown is what makes mocking you all so easy. After the confirmation that drumpf’s got a little baby mushroom, the most realistic scenario for next week is a bootlegged Twitter dck pic from @potus to distract from cocaine Mitch pushing through a rapist to the SCOTUS. Do you even hear yourself? Have you ever turned on the TV and seen and listened to our politicians? Do you know how many of them are, to some extent, corrupt, dishonest, phony, clueless, two-faced, narcissistic, ambitious, stupid, feeble, lecherous, perverted, ignorant, liars, inept, etc, etc, etc.? A Rapist was our President from 1992 to 2000 and I doubt you gave a rats a$$ about that fact. The last President was a buffoon getting his head handed to him in foreign policy, national security, immigration policy, medical policy (have you had to pay your own insurance premium lately?), trade, etc, etc. Who cares that he was eloquent? To cite a phrase "what different does it make" that he was an eloquent clueless clown? And then there is the blatant corruption of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA that he fostered. He knew the Russians were messing with us for years and the best he could muster was a ham fisted frame up of his political enemy? And what does it say about Hillary and the Democrats when they couldn't win with the power of the Executive Branch putting their weight on the scale and still lost? It comes down to policies. The Democrat's policies suck. And the 16 or 17 GOP challengers were not offering that much of a difference and that is why the mid-western Democrats elected Donald Trump. His policies are not perfect but light years better than the clueless clown he ran against. And we are seeing good results from thise policies. I understand the left is all about emotion, style and optics but give me a crass obnoxious business man who might be the only way to change the direction of the Titanic of State, at least for some areas. When the politicians (noted initially) abhor the man, he must be doing something right. That was pretty spot on..... |
|
