|
Post by AztecWilliam on Aug 7, 2017 3:41:06 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Aug 7, 2017 10:47:05 GMT -8
I think the 35 to 40 full-time definition could have some unintended consequences, and the number should be higher than 50 but lower than 500. Other than that, let's go - everyone's ready to vote. ...oh, wait, what's that?... why aren't we voting?...
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 7, 2017 12:32:14 GMT -8
Dems want to use the term "fix" while Repubs want to say "repeal and replace". Even if they both had the exact same plan to present. neither side would be able to pass anything just over the squabble about those two terms. I blame both sides. Also, so far, I have not seen any logical plan that would work for anyone.
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Aug 8, 2017 10:16:29 GMT -8
The fix is simple. The model is already in place and works. Single payer medicare for all.
The only thing to figure out is how much. Not that hard.
Everyone who works would participate. This is a CONSERVATIVE policy.
You have your choice of either managing it yourself or joining an Advantage Plan managed by an insurance company.
Everyone pays and everyone benefits.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2017 19:44:08 GMT -8
Dems want to use the term "fix" while Repubs want to say "repeal and replace". Even if they both had the exact same plan to present. neither side would be able to pass anything just over the squabble about those two terms. I blame both sides. Also, so far, I have not seen any logical plan that would work for anyone. New formula. R+D=S...
|
|