|
Post by OCEOTL on Feb 4, 2015 17:19:43 GMT -8
2014 = 10-2 2015 = 13-0 I could speak tongue-in-check instead of tongue-in-cheek
|
|
|
Post by Sdsu4life on Feb 4, 2015 17:29:16 GMT -8
LOL. They recruit. Don't let your hate for them fill your brain with ignorance. Logic and reasoning, my friend. No point in making up facts just to meet your agenda. Yes I should have said they don’t recruit "as much as" cherry pick. There is not hate of USC never did hate them never will. There fans were a bit obnoxious when they are on top. So are SDSU basketball fans, obnoxious as hell. This cherry pick witticism is obviously made partly tongue in cheek and has been made by many color men on College Broadcasts,( particularly former coaches) over the years about the programs like USC, Ohio State, Alabama. Technically every team cherry picks those it can get, but the USC's Ohio States and Alabama's have the crème de la crème to choose from. Even logic has its limits however since you’re a philosopher it seems you are aware of Goedels two incompleteness theorems. I am glad that I provided you with a moment of mirthYes I should have said they don’t recruit "as much as" cherry pick. There is not hate of USC never did hate them never will. There fans were a bit obnoxious when they are on top. So are SDSU basketball fans, obnoxious as hell. This cherry pick witticism is obviously made partly tongue in cheek made by many color men on College Broadcasts,( particularly former coaches) over the years about the programs like USC, Ohio State, Alabama. Technically every team cherry picks those it can get, but the USC's Ohio States and Alabama's have the crème de la crème to choose from. Even logic has its limits however since you’re a philosopher it seems you are aware of Goedels two incompleteness theorems. :)Please feel free to build strawmen out of anything I should write on this august forum. However while dancing around your bon fire dont fall in a stream of self gratulation and be eaten by an Allegory So you never once thought that maybe the reason why they have the "creme de la creme" to choose from is because they are a prestigious powerhouse? lol. It is up to the kids where they go. They get the offers, and they decide which one to choose. The reasons are very obvious why kids choose the Bamas and SC's over the SDSU's. By your definition, every school outside of being the first to offer a kid, is cherry picking lol. The teams offer, the kid chooses.
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Feb 4, 2015 17:43:12 GMT -8
USC signed two 6'4" WR 's De'Quan Hampton and Issac Witney . So we were able to sign Desean who is about 5'10 or 11". Rocky said he may move some TE's to WR to "Gronk for the ball . Horton said we may do more short throws to get the ball in the hands of the receivers and let them make extra yards after the catch. USC also signed the DT Kevin Scott we were talking to .
|
|
|
Post by laaztec on Feb 4, 2015 17:51:50 GMT -8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2015 18:01:26 GMT -8
Yes I should have said they don’t recruit "as much as" cherry pick. There is not hate of USC never did hate them never will. There fans were a bit obnoxious when they are on top. So are SDSU basketball fans, obnoxious as hell. This cherry pick witticism is obviously made partly tongue in cheek and has been made by many color men on College Broadcasts,( particularly former coaches) over the years about the programs like USC, Ohio State, Alabama. Technically every team cherry picks those it can get, but the USC's Ohio States and Alabama's have the crème de la crème to choose from. Even logic has its limits however since you’re a philosopher it seems you are aware of Goedels two incompleteness theorems. I am glad that I provided you with a moment of mirthYes I should have said they don’t recruit "as much as" cherry pick. There is not hate of USC never did hate them never will. There fans were a bit obnoxious when they are on top. So are SDSU basketball fans, obnoxious as hell. This cherry pick witticism is obviously made partly tongue in cheek made by many color men on College Broadcasts,( particularly former coaches) over the years about the programs like USC, Ohio State, Alabama. Technically every team cherry picks those it can get, but the USC's Ohio States and Alabama's have the crème de la crème to choose from. Even logic has its limits however since you’re a philosopher it seems you are aware of Goedels two incompleteness theorems. :)Please feel free to build strawmen out of anything I should write on this august forum. However while dancing around your bon fire dont fall in a stream of self gratulation and be eaten by an Allegory So you never once thought that maybe the reason why they have the "creme de la creme" to choose from is because they are a prestigious powerhouse? lol. It is up to the kids where they go. They get the offers, and they decide which one to choose. The reasons are very obvious why kids choose the Bamas and SC's over the SDSU's. By your definition, every school outside of being the first to offer a kid, is cherry picking lol. The teams offer, the kid chooses. So you never once thought that maybe the reason why they have the "creme de la creme" to choose from is because they are a prestigious powerhouse? lol Your a little thick aren't you that they are a powerhouse is inherent in the statement,which is why i compared them with other powerhouses.
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Feb 4, 2015 18:12:15 GMT -8
Most of the Top level P5 schools are going to be able to get the majority of the 5 and 4 star recruits they want . Some 4 star guys may decide it may be better to go to a school where they may play sooner then be buried in the depth charts or other priorities they may have . This time we were right school , Tony White did his home work as lead recruitor and we have a 4 * recruit .
|
|
|
Post by Sdsu4life on Feb 5, 2015 9:52:37 GMT -8
So you never once thought that maybe the reason why they have the "creme de la creme" to choose from is because they are a prestigious powerhouse? lol. It is up to the kids where they go. They get the offers, and they decide which one to choose. The reasons are very obvious why kids choose the Bamas and SC's over the SDSU's. By your definition, every school outside of being the first to offer a kid, is cherry picking lol. The teams offer, the kid chooses. So you never once thought that maybe the reason why they have the "creme de la creme" to choose from is because they are a prestigious powerhouse? lol Your a little thick aren't you that they are a powerhouse is inherent in the statement,which is why i compared them with other powerhouses. You are failing to realize the reality of things. I understand your bitterness. I mean, for me personally, I don't waste my time on that weak minded stuff. I see the reality of things. USC isn't good because they poach kids from our backyard, they are good because they have built a program with great facilities, great national exposure, great tradition, and have produced MANY NFL players. That can be said for the Bamas, Auburns, Floridas, Ohio State, Texas, Oklahoma, etc. They get to pick and choose who they want not because of cheating or any type of sketchy strategy. They get to pick and choose who they want because of what they can offer the kid. USC recruits, they don't poach. Again, by your definition, every team that isnt the first to offer a particular kid is poaching. Heck, we even poached a bunch of kids in this class lol. Double standards eh? USC makes offers to the kids they want, we make offers to the kids we want...heck, every school makes offers to the kids they want. They don't offer and sign a kid out of spite of another school lol. They offer the kids that they want and that they believe will help them win. it is up to the kid to choose where he wants to go. But, I get why you need to make up accusations to cover up the reality of things. Not my approach to life personally, but your motive is pretty clear. edit: Oh and no, you are correct, those schools aren't prestigious inherently. Before I continue, please point out where I said such a thing. Anyways, I agree, they aren't prestigious inherently, they are prestigious do to their century long rich tradition and their strong desire and ability to pump millions upon millions of dollars into their program, staff and facilities. Their ability to win big games, their ability to have consistent winning seasons, their ability to produce gameday atmosphere 2nd to none, and their ability to be contenders for National Championships.The reasons are very obvious why 4 and 5 stars choose high end P5 schools over lower end P5 and G5 schools. Again, create whatever accusations you need to help yourself cope with the reality of things. A pretty weak minded thing to do, but hey if you need to blind yourself from the truth to keep yourself sane, then I guess that is the important thing.
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Feb 5, 2015 11:14:19 GMT -8
there are reasons the P5 and the PAC enjoy the advantages they get when it comes to recruiting . One of the reasons they do not want SDSU to join them . Even in the P5 and PAC there are upper and lower level schools . So there maybe level A the upper PAC , Level B lower PAC then G5 , and there may be upper and lower level there . Feel confident BSU , SDSU tout their success vs lower level MW . Then there are levels of HS , and would guess the higher levels really want to get more coaches from the Level A coaches to boost their program for their top recruits and then lower level colleges for their lower players. The top 25 colleges ( say a USC ) are going to asked to come watch the top HS players say 5 or 4 star players . They have their lists of guys they want to see and try to sign and there is a fierce battle for those guys by colleges all over the country . This is where some of the TV money can come in to play - recruiting budget . So if USC has 25 scholarships they may have 15 or X amount go in that direction . then coaches may need go to the next tier say 3 star . Very easy now a days to go on the internet. Remember recruiting is half their job and how they stay employed , some are hired for that purpose, so they will go over their list or even check other teams to see who they need to try to sign . Unless they change the system , verbal primarily means :I think I like your school , unless I get a better offer , from a higher level P5 school .The system favors the P5 , especially the upper level , they know it and will use it to their advantage
|
|
|
Post by AccessBowlTime on Feb 5, 2015 11:33:03 GMT -8
Considering how close we are right now to the Colorados, Oregon States and Washington States, if we were a member of the Pac, we would be blowing their doors off in recruiting.
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Feb 5, 2015 12:47:30 GMT -8
Yes, but that is The big reason why schools in the PAC are not going to let SDSU into the PAC . Especially the lower level teams in the PAC , the recruiting advantage they still have over G5 schools, and they still get the big TV money .that really helps all levels of their programs .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2015 12:52:20 GMT -8
So you never once thought that maybe the reason why they have the "creme de la creme" to choose from is because they are a prestigious powerhouse? lol Your a little thick aren't you that they are a powerhouse is inherent in the statement,which is why i compared them with other powerhouses. You are failing to realize the reality of things. I understand your bitterness. I mean, for me personally, I don't waste my time on that weak minded stuff. I see the reality of things. USC isn't good because they poach kids from our backyard, they are good because they have built a program with great facilities, great national exposure, great tradition, and have produced MANY NFL players. That can be said for the Bamas, Auburns, Floridas, Ohio State, Texas, Oklahoma, etc. They get to pick and choose who they want not because of cheating or any type of sketchy strategy. They get to pick and choose who they want because of what they can offer the kid. USC recruits, they don't poach. Again, by your definition, every team that isnt the first to offer a particular kid is poaching. Heck, we even poached a bunch of kids in this class lol. Double standards eh? USC makes offers to the kids they want, we make offers to the kids we want...heck, every school makes offers to the kids they want. They don't offer and sign a kid out of spite of another school lol. They offer the kids that they want and that they believe will help them win. it is up to the kid to choose where he wants to go. But, I get why you need to make up accusations to cover up the reality of things. Not my approach to life personally, but your motive is pretty clear. edit: Oh and no, you are correct, those schools aren't prestigious inherently. Before I continue, please point out where I said such a thing. Anyways, I agree, they aren't prestigious inherently, they are prestigious do to their century long rich tradition and their strong desire and ability to pump millions upon millions of dollars into their program, staff and facilities. Their ability to win big games, their ability to have consistent winning seasons, their ability to produce gameday atmosphere 2nd to none, and their ability to be contenders for National Championships.The reasons are very obvious why 4 and 5 stars choose high end P5 schools over lower end P5 and G5 schools. Again, create whatever accusations you need to help yourself cope with the reality of things. A pretty weak minded thing to do, but hey if you need to blind yourself from the truth to keep yourself sane, then I guess that is the important thing. You are failing to realize the reality of things. I understand your bitterness. I mean, for me personally, I don't waste my time on that weak minded stuff. I really could not care less about USC football etc and so on. You're just another anonymous dude on the net prattling on about how "tough Minded" you are. It would appear though your rather easily roused to anger. Not usually a sign of moral strength or intellectual persapacity. You do not know how funny this statement is "the reality of things"to someone who has background in philosophy.Nobody wants to read this boring tete a tete so discussion over. if you want to say something to me use the message board, I just blocked you Read more: aztecmesa.proboards.com/thread/42117/2015-football-loi-official-thread?page=8#ixzz3Qu25vwxO
|
|
|
Post by ron on Feb 5, 2015 17:14:05 GMT -8
What happened to Terrell Battle?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2015 18:21:23 GMT -8
What happened to Terrell Battle? he decided not to sign,I think withut aredshirt year he would likely only get one year playing.
|
|
|
Post by McQuervo on Feb 5, 2015 18:42:32 GMT -8
Ok, Ok LT I guess I like another Marine. But of course, he is AIRBORNE! ;+)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2015 20:18:54 GMT -8
Inside joke with MC Cuervo
Fort Benning was a nasty place the red hats were all mean They threw me out of aircraft just to hear me scream But I was a jolly jarhead mos 8652 So the only sound I made was yippy Ki Yahoo!!!
|
|