|
Post by aztecwin on Mar 11, 2014 16:04:06 GMT -8
Once again, capitulation by your own terms. Whatever! When you make an intelligent comment on an economic issue or an effective counter to anything I say it will make me question my extremely low opinion of your judgment.
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Mar 11, 2014 16:21:05 GMT -8
Once again, capitulation by your own terms. Whatever! When you make an intelligent comment on an economic issue or an effective counter to anything I say it will make me question my extremely low opinion of your judgment. Another insult. Capitulation by your own terms.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Mar 12, 2014 12:27:03 GMT -8
Whatever! When you make an intelligent comment on an economic issue or an effective counter to anything I say it will make me question my extremely low opinion of your judgment. Another insult. Capitulation by your own terms. I guess I would view the truth as an insult if I were you.
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Mar 12, 2014 13:11:43 GMT -8
Another insult. Capitulation by your own terms. I guess I would view the truth as an insult if I were you. Another capitulation.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Mar 12, 2014 16:55:43 GMT -8
Am I getting to the point of being annoyed? Nope! I enjoy this kind of thing that exposes the nearly unarmed.
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Mar 12, 2014 17:01:12 GMT -8
Am I getting to the point of being annoyed? Nope! I enjoy this kind of thing that exposes the nearly unarmed. Another capitulation.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Mar 12, 2014 17:34:30 GMT -8
And Aztec70 says "And there I was stuck in a rut with nothing of substance to say".
|
|
|
Post by azteccc on Mar 12, 2014 17:40:45 GMT -8
Well that got out of hand quickly.
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Mar 12, 2014 19:31:05 GMT -8
And Aztec70 says "And there I was stuck in a rut with nothing of substance to say". Another capitulation.
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Mar 13, 2014 8:22:30 GMT -8
That's a matter of opinion. I object to many of his points, but most of all I object to his unspoken concept of wealth not really belonging to those who earned it, but to the government. It is therefore the government's job to decide how much you can keep. In addition to the basic collectivist value that the government is the source of wealth (remember "You didn't build that"?) there is the problem that the measures Krugman, et al, favor will never achieve the goal they strive for. There will always be inequality, based on many factors. Trying to achieve equality of outcome, which is the Left's main goal, leads to an all-powerful government run by manipulating scoundrels who give lip service to their stated goal but who in reality use the police power of the state to enrich themselves. And, if collectivism is really such a good idea, why has it failed so miserably in the countries which have most thoroughly adopted that economic system? AzWm I was watching a video about the current situation in France today, economically. With the wealth and brains leaving that sad country for safer venues, it was reported that in a very short time France would be one of the poorest, if not the poorest, countries in Europe. Yeah. We should aspire to be like Europe, and France. Morons.
|
|