|
Post by pdraztec on Dec 10, 2012 12:16:52 GMT -8
After seeing their highlite reels, hearing what the coach and parents said, what the recruiting analysts said and the fact that they are solid in academics I am really impressed and delighted with these 2 young guys. They have great accolades.....both 1st team all-conference and 1st team all-state. Morrow is coming in as ATH recruit and has the capability to play at many positions. He has that beautiful, long stride of a hurdler....and all-state to boot. Love the way this class has shaped up....now have 10 commits from out of state.
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Dec 10, 2012 12:25:04 GMT -8
Kids love to go away to college. Why not San Diego State!
This!
|
|
|
Post by ignoranus on Dec 10, 2012 12:27:31 GMT -8
Notre Dame has mined the Catholic schools of Chicago forever.
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Dec 10, 2012 12:51:54 GMT -8
Notre Dame has mined the Catholic schools of Chicago the US forever.
|
|
|
Post by badfish on Dec 10, 2012 14:28:08 GMT -8
Notre Dame has mined the Catholic schools of Chicago the US forever. Grew up in Catholic school, ND was my dream school when I was little an it's the only college my teachers talked about. Hell, we watched Rudy for a project in 7th grade and classrooms often had ND pennants and such. Now, they're my second favorite team and I'll be rocking my Irish gear on January 7th!
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Dec 10, 2012 14:31:52 GMT -8
As noted by others great to see that SDSU can now bring in guys from all over the country, opens up a lot of opportunities in the future. Would be nice if the mens basketball team could add a couple of recruits from those areas .
|
|
|
Post by FULL_MONTY on Dec 10, 2012 14:33:04 GMT -8
As noted by others great to see that SDSU can now bring in guys from all over the country, opens up a lot of opportunities in the future. Would be nice if the mens basketball team could add a couple of recruits from those areas . It is part of the overall University Plan.
|
|
|
Post by fowl on Dec 10, 2012 18:50:03 GMT -8
I certainly have an issue with this on several fronts. First, with the kid verballing to CMU, then tripping here, and then committing reportedly before even de-committing. I mean when the hell did he de-committ? On the plane ride home after he committed here?? Just poor taste and reflective of bad character. I don't know when he de-committed (it was never previously reported on the rivals or Scout sites for CMU), but if he wasn't interested in CMU anymore he should have told them so when that was the case.
Second, I think it was a BS move by our staff to recruit a kid who was committed elsewhere and then bring him here on an official and then offer him. If the kid is interested in us tell him we don't offer or trip kids who are committed elsewhere.
You guys might disagree and say "that's just the way things are now" but if the kid didn't de-committ until after committing to us then our staff has become part of the problem as opposed to the solution and are just as bad as these kids. If the kid did de-committ a while back before we offered him an official then it's a different story.
|
|
|
Post by badfish on Dec 10, 2012 19:27:45 GMT -8
I certainly have an issue with this on several fronts. First, with the kid verballing to CMU, then tripping here, and then committing reportedly before even de-committing. I mean when the hell did he de-committ? On the plane ride home after he committed here?? Just poor taste and reflective of bad character. I don't know when he de-committed (it was never previously reported on the rivals or Scout sites for CMU), but if he wasn't interested in CMU anymore he should have told them so when that was the case. Second, I think it was a BS move by our staff to recruit a kid who was committed elsewhere and then bring him here on an official and then offer him. If the kid is interested in us tell him we don't offer or trip kids who are committed elsewhere. You guys might disagree and say "that's just the way things are now" but if the kid didn't de-committ until after committing to us then our staff has become part of the problem as opposed to the solution and are just as bad as these kids. If the kid did de-committ a while back before we offered him an official then it's a different story. UW and Victor just did the same to us. Boise offered our commit last year like a week before LOI day and he committed there. It's how the big boys play, we either adapt or get left behind in luvy-duvy town.
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Dec 10, 2012 19:48:41 GMT -8
unfortunately recruiting is a shady con game. If the rules allow recruits to keep taking trips until they sign LOI , then they are going to do it until they get the best offer they can.They are not going to De- commit until they make sure they have a firm offer from the new School. By the way how does an athlete officially De- commit . If he does call a University to De- ,they can not comment. Looks like one of the most important coaches on a staff is your "recruiting coach". Didn't UCLA get at least one ,when they brought in Mora, same thing with USC......
|
|
|
Post by montyismyhomie on Dec 10, 2012 19:58:29 GMT -8
I certainly have an issue with this on several fronts. First, with the kid verballing to CMU, then tripping here, and then committing reportedly before even de-committing. I mean when the hell did he de-committ? On the plane ride home after he committed here?? Just poor taste and reflective of bad character. I don't know when he de-committed (it was never previously reported on the rivals or Scout sites for CMU), but if he wasn't interested in CMU anymore he should have told them so when that was the case. Second, I think it was a BS move by our staff to recruit a kid who was committed elsewhere and then bring him here on an official and then offer him. If the kid is interested in us tell him we don't offer or trip kids who are committed elsewhere. You guys might disagree and say "that's just the way things are now" but if the kid didn't de-committ until after committing to us then our staff has become part of the problem as opposed to the solution and are just as bad as these kids. If the kid did de-committ a while back before we offered him an official then it's a different story. jeez sally, you been to the beach lately? sounds like you've got some sand in your vag and its making you irritable. you people are supposed to be grown ups. stop judging these kids over how they choose where they are going to school. you literally sound like a dbag complaining about this stuff. and none of you actually knows how these situations really go down anyway. sorry im telling you and the handful of other whiners to STFU but you are so out of line complaining about this $hit its not even funny. its disgusting.
|
|
|
Post by Boise Aztec on Dec 10, 2012 20:32:11 GMT -8
I certainly have an issue with this on several fronts. First, with the kid verballing to CMU, then tripping here, and then committing reportedly before even de-committing. I mean when the hell did he de-committ? On the plane ride home after he committed here?? Just poor taste and reflective of bad character. I don't know when he de-committed (it was never previously reported on the rivals or Scout sites for CMU), but if he wasn't interested in CMU anymore he should have told them so when that was the case. Second, I think it was a BS move by our staff to recruit a kid who was committed elsewhere and then bring him here on an official and then offer him. If the kid is interested in us tell him we don't offer or trip kids who are committed elsewhere. You guys might disagree and say "that's just the way things are now" but if the kid didn't de-committ until after committing to us then our staff has become part of the problem as opposed to the solution and are just as bad as these kids. If the kid did de-committ a while back before we offered him an official then it's a different story. Really... So you tell every job you have ever had that you are leaving prior to talking with another company to finalize an offer.
|
|
|
Post by aztecfan1 on Dec 10, 2012 20:48:29 GMT -8
Chicago is certainly unique territory for us. Checked with my chi town buddy and said the HS has no football resume of note. Small, catholic school in the very rough southside. That said, perhaps that they are coming together will be an indicator that they will stick with this commit. Players for real? About 2014, we would find out.
|
|
|
Post by spgonzo on Dec 11, 2012 6:32:24 GMT -8
I certainly have an issue with this on several fronts. First, with the kid verballing to CMU, then tripping here, and then committing reportedly before even de-committing. I mean when the hell did he de-committ? On the plane ride home after he committed here?? Just poor taste and reflective of bad character. I don't know when he de-committed (it was never previously reported on the rivals or Scout sites for CMU), but if he wasn't interested in CMU anymore he should have told them so when that was the case. Second, I think it was a BS move by our staff to recruit a kid who was committed elsewhere and then bring him here on an official and then offer him. If the kid is interested in us tell him we don't offer or trip kids who are committed elsewhere. You guys might disagree and say "that's just the way things are now" but if the kid didn't de-committ until after committing to us then our staff has become part of the problem as opposed to the solution and are just as bad as these kids. If the kid did de-committ a while back before we offered him an official then it's a different story. jeez sally, you been to the beach lately? sounds like you've got some sand in your vag and its making you irritable. you people are supposed to be grown ups. stop judging these kids over how they choose where they are going to school. you literally sound like a dbag complaining about this stuff. and none of you actually knows how these situations really go down anyway. sorry im telling you and the handful of other whiners to STFU but you are so out of line complaining about this $hit its not even funny. its disgusting. Wow, perfect. +1,000
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2012 7:43:20 GMT -8
A commitment is not a contract, mY only gripe is when they comitt somewhere else for weeks and try to keep you hanging on in case they get bumped,or iffy grades. Nor do I like Coaches who misrepresent their position on a kid and he passes up chances because of it. Really good coaches like Rocky Long are brutally honest. They will tell you your third on out board we will offer you if A and B do not commit. The law is if they are still tripping they are not a solid commit and if someone better does comitt and stops visits,your gone or grey shirt, Trip at your own risk. (coaches)make exception for Hawaii trips ;)really early commits are iffy ti the max. Billy Young jR I give 50% tops at staying. I realy Like Kalan Montgomery,he will be visiting soon.If Taylor or Wilson do not make it in I can see Kalan taking the db spot and Morrow the wr,
|
|
|
Post by kozy on Dec 11, 2012 8:13:36 GMT -8
Got out my Flash Gorden decoder ring and got some of your comments. Lets see, Billy Young = Billy Vaugh. Taylor is Tyler Morris from NV. OK the Wilson did not translate. I even tried running it backwards at 33RPM. Nothing. Since you might be talking DB's think it might be Lomax from MM?.
Please Flash update your mystery code.
The Navajos have nothing over you.
|
|
|
Post by cvtower on Dec 11, 2012 8:31:18 GMT -8
Got out my Flash Gorden decoder ring and got some of your comments. Lets see, Billy Young = Billy Vaugh. Taylor is Tyler Morris from NV. OK the Wilson did not translate. I even tried running it backwards at 33RPM. Nothing. Since you might be talking DB's think it might be Lomax from MM?. Please Flash update your mystery code. The Navajos have nothing over you. Wilson is Julius Wilson, a speedster WR from Culver City HS in Culver City, CA. He was one of SDSU's earliest offers this recruiting period
|
|
|
Post by kozy on Dec 11, 2012 8:44:15 GMT -8
Wilson isn't a commitment just an offer so far.
|
|
|
Post by cvtower on Dec 11, 2012 9:55:50 GMT -8
Wilson isn't a commitment just an offer so far. I don't think steveem was referring to current commits, but rather players with offers that are high on SDSU's radar. Wilson, Taylor (a WR from the LA area), and Montgomery (a DB) fit that category
|
|
|
Post by ron on Dec 11, 2012 16:54:39 GMT -8
These two look like players. But, let's not forget that they could do the same thing as Azeem did and change their minds. They may just be waiting for a better offer. We don't know until Feb.
|
|