|
Post by aztecwin on Oct 31, 2012 12:48:26 GMT -8
Just more confusion over a very poorly crafted law with all of us as victims. Why does Faux News make victims out of all of you? Fox does nothing but report. The law is flawed.
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Oct 31, 2012 13:05:48 GMT -8
Why does Faux News make victims out of all of you? Fox does nothing but report. The law is flawed. ROFL ;D
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Oct 31, 2012 13:16:13 GMT -8
Not everyone has the same political leanings as they have in Massachusetts. They do not, I repeat, do not represent the majority of the GOP. And anything Romney did there was to placate that particular electorate. But you help me make my point. Only in Obamaworld can such a popular concept be made into such a divisive issue. Were you not tuning in during the town hall meetings? There were some serious concerns that went unanswered as Obamacare was shoved down the throats of Americans. Just because there are whole pieces of corn in a turd, don't expect anyone to want to eat it.
|
|
|
Post by aztecsrule72001 on Oct 31, 2012 13:52:28 GMT -8
Didn't the Dems have super majorities? A common misbelief. The House always had enough Blue Dog Democrats (i.e. Republicans registered in the wrong party for them) to make the "supermajority" an illusion there. And following the months-long GOP challenge to the election of Sen. Franken, plus the long illnesses that kept Sens. Byrd and Kennedy out of their seats for much of 2009 and 2010, the Democrats actually had 60 votes in the Senate for a total of exactly 72 days during Pres. Obama's first two years. And Several of those friendly senators were conservative Democrats like Nelson who wanted no part of a more ambitious, Canadian-style plan, and threatened to kill one if it came to a vote. Further, most of the 72 days with a supermajority in the Senate fell before and after the debate over the Affordable Care Act took place. The watered-down bill we got was finally passed 60-39 during a small window in which Kennedy's temporary Democratic replacement was in office and his permanent Republican replacement, Sen. Brown, hadn't yet been elected. So the PPACA as written was never fillibuster proof. The Republicans, and Republican-leaning Democrats, were always able to weaken or stop it. So it's the Democrats fault. Don't even try to blame Republicans for not supporting something that only extreme liberals support.
|
|
|
Post by norseman on Jan 23, 2013 6:29:39 GMT -8
I hear elective medical care outside of their medical care system is strictly not allowed. The patient must travel to the US in such situations.
|
|