|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 5, 2012 17:34:02 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 6, 2012 10:16:40 GMT -8
Wrong again! Krugman has had an incredible run at being wrong. He comes close on a couple issues, but his idea of deficit spending as part of the cure for the private side is just dead wrong as is his usual. Krugman has never seen a policy that would lead to inflation that he did not like.
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 6, 2012 16:04:56 GMT -8
Wrong again! Krugman has had an incredible run at being wrong. He comes close on a couple issues, but his idea of deficit spending as part of the cure for the private side is just dead wrong as is his usual. Krugman has never seen a policy that would lead to inflation that he did not like. So how is that cutting taxes will create jobs working out for you cons? Been over 10 years since your man GW fixed that.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 6, 2012 17:02:32 GMT -8
Wrong again! Krugman has had an incredible run at being wrong. He comes close on a couple issues, but his idea of deficit spending as part of the cure for the private side is just dead wrong as is his usual. Krugman has never seen a policy that would lead to inflation that he did not like. So how is that cutting taxes will create jobs working out for you cons? Been over 10 years since your man GW fixed that. What does anything GW did have to do with the conditions today? This about just how wrong Krugman is today and his long record of being wrong. GW is history. He is back clearing brush on his ranch. He should hire Krugman as Krugman is more qualified to clear brush that write about economics.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 6, 2012 17:04:18 GMT -8
Wrong again! Krugman has had an incredible run at being wrong. He comes close on a couple issues, but his idea of deficit spending as part of the cure for the private side is just dead wrong as is his usual. Krugman has never seen a policy that would lead to inflation that he did not like. So how is that cutting taxes will create jobs working out for you cons? Been over 10 years since your man GW fixed that. Another comment on this. Obama will cave in to extend those tax cuts soon. Romney will make those cut permanent and we will get this economy going again.
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 6, 2012 21:08:40 GMT -8
So how is that cutting taxes will create jobs working out for you cons? Been over 10 years since your man GW fixed that. Another comment on this. Obama will cave in to extend those tax cuts soon. Romney will make those cut permanent and we will get this economy going again. LOL
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 6, 2012 21:13:38 GMT -8
So how is that cutting taxes will create jobs working out for you cons? Been over 10 years since your man GW fixed that. What does anything GW did have to do with the conditions today? This about just how wrong Krugman is today and his long record of being wrong. GW is history. He is back clearing brush on his ranch. He should hire Krugman as Krugman is more qualified to clear brush that write about economics. His badly flawed economic policy caused today.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 7, 2012 12:27:36 GMT -8
What does anything GW did have to do with the conditions today? This about just how wrong Krugman is today and his long record of being wrong. GW is history. He is back clearing brush on his ranch. He should hire Krugman as Krugman is more qualified to clear brush that write about economics. His badly flawed economic policy caused today. Who? Krugman? Obama has done some of the things Krugman advocates and has run us even further into the ground. Bush was no bargain, but Obama is a clueless buffoon!
|
|
|
Post by aztecsrule72001 on Aug 7, 2012 12:45:00 GMT -8
Does Krugman pay you to pimp his articles?
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 7, 2012 12:52:17 GMT -8
Does Krugman pay you to pimp his articles? No. I would do it more often, if he did.
|
|
|
Post by hbaztec on Aug 9, 2012 11:57:24 GMT -8
So how is that cutting taxes will create jobs working out for you cons? Been over 10 years since your man GW fixed that. What does anything GW did have to do with the conditions today? This about just how wrong Krugman is today and his long record of being wrong. GW is history. He is back clearing brush on his ranch. He should hire Krugman as Krugman is more qualified to clear brush that write about economics. I am sorry but you can't wipe out history that easily. How nice it must be to state 8 years of poor economic polices that did not work are now wiped out. Trickle down never has worked, and there is factual data that supports that. Corporations are sitting on tons of cash, they have not created many jobs.
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Aug 9, 2012 13:03:44 GMT -8
>>>Corporations are sitting on tons of cash, they have not created many jobs.<<<
And they will continue to do so, until this stinking turd is out of office.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 9, 2012 13:40:38 GMT -8
What does anything GW did have to do with the conditions today? This about just how wrong Krugman is today and his long record of being wrong. GW is history. He is back clearing brush on his ranch. He should hire Krugman as Krugman is more qualified to clear brush that write about economics. I am sorry but you can't wipe out history that easily. How nice it must be to state 8 years of poor economic polices that did not work are now wiped out. Trickle down never has worked, and there is factual data that supports that. Corporations are sitting on tons of cash, they have not created many jobs. Want to look back or look forward? Bush is long gone and whatever he did by not using his veto pen can not be changed. What we can change is the even more clueless and maybe purposely distructive jerk in the Whitehouse now.
|
|
|
Post by hbaztec on Aug 10, 2012 15:33:19 GMT -8
Wow, you win at name calling.
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 10, 2012 16:19:22 GMT -8
I am sorry but you can't wipe out history that easily. How nice it must be to state 8 years of poor economic polices that did not work are now wiped out. Trickle down never has worked, and there is factual data that supports that. Corporations are sitting on tons of cash, they have not created many jobs. Want to look back or look forward? Bush is long gone and whatever he did by not using his veto pen can not be changed. What we can change is the even more clueless and maybe purposely distructive jerk in the Whitehouse now. If you don't understand the mistakes of the past, you are doomed to repeat the flawed GOP policys got us where we are now. We need to look backward and forward.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 11, 2012 7:41:22 GMT -8
Wow, you win at name calling. One person's name calling is another's accurate labeling.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 11, 2012 7:45:04 GMT -8
Want to look back or look forward? Bush is long gone and whatever he did by not using his veto pen can not be changed. What we can change is the even more clueless and maybe purposely destructive jerk in the Whitehouse now. If you don't understand the mistakes of the past, you are doomed to repeat the flawed GOP policys got us where we are now. We need to look backward and forward. You should learn from mistakes for sure. Will you ever recognize that pouring tax money down a rat hole is not good policy? What is it about inflation that excites you?
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 11, 2012 11:33:50 GMT -8
If you don't understand the mistakes of the past, you are doomed to repeat the flawed GOP policys got us where we are now. We need to look backward and forward. You should learn from mistakes for sure. Will you ever recognize that pouring tax money down a rat hole is not good policy? What is it about inflation that excites you? What did you learn from Bush's mistakes?
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Aug 11, 2012 11:37:55 GMT -8
You should learn from mistakes for sure. Will you ever recognize that pouring tax money down a rat hole is not good policy? What is it about inflation that excites you? What did you learn from Bush's mistakes? Bush was a huge mistake but not near what algore or Kerry would have been or the total inflation bomb that obama is. That is what I learned. How about you or are you too dense to catch on to those things? How do you have time to be on here? Shouldn't you be working on =Bob's two years past due tax returns or did he really fire you?
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Aug 11, 2012 11:43:20 GMT -8
What did you learn from Bush's mistakes? Bush was a huge mistake but not near what algore or Kerry would have been or the total inflation bomb that obama is. That is what I learned. How about you or are you too dense to catch on to those things? How do you have time to be on here? Shouldn't you be working on =Bob's two years past due tax returns or did he really fire you? I learned, again, that the Laffer Curve is laughable.
|
|