|
|
Post by k5james on Aug 27, 2012 6:38:58 GMT -8
Washington OL
LT - M. Hatchie - 6-5 293 - 5.6
LG - C. Tanigawa - 6-3 281 - 5.6
C - D. Schaefer - 6-4 294 - 5.7
RG - E. Kohler - 6-4 299 - 5.8
RT - B. Riva - 6-6 302 - 5.7
AVG - 6-4.4 293.8
SDSU DL
DE - D. Onuoha - 6-2 265 - 13tkls 2tfl 1sks - 5.6
DT - S. Meredith - 6-4 275 - 4tkls 1tfl - 5.5
DE - J. Thomas - 6-1 255 - 20tkls 3tfl - 5.5
AVG - 6-2.3 265
SDSU OL
LT - B. Quigley - 6-5 295 - 5.5
LG - J. Gordon - 6-3 295 - NR
C - A. Johnson - 6-3 300 - 5.4
RG - N. Embernate - 6-4 300 - 5.2
RT - Z. Dilley - 6-5 295 - 5.6
AVG - 6-4 297
Washington DL
DE - T. Chrichton - 6-3 264 - 5tkls - 5.6
DT - A. Hudson - 6-3 249 - 24tkls 5tfl 3.5sks - 5.7
NT - D. Shelton - 6-1 317 - 11tkls - 5.8
RE - J. Shirley - 6-3 230 - 28tkls 12tfl 8.5 sks- 5.8
AVG - 6-2.5 265
Our OL is a bit larger than theirs and our DLs are almost the exact same size across the board. Shirley is the biggest threat in the passing game but from what I saw on the couple games I watched of theirs last year he's a liability against the run. We "should" be able to run against these guys and if we can, I like our chances. The last number is the Rivals rating for each player so you can see the supposed talent gap between the units.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2012 6:56:10 GMT -8
I just read this week that their center is only 286 pounds and one of their guards is about the same weight. Can't remember where I saw that depth chart. Also their two DT weighed well over 310 pounds. So if what I read is accurate we are much bigger as an OL and they are much bigger as a DL. I'll try to find the depth chart I was looking at.
|
|
|
|
Post by k5james on Aug 27, 2012 6:59:29 GMT -8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2012 8:40:07 GMT -8
Hell I can't find it right now. Either way we are bigger on OL and they are bigger on DL.
|
|
|
|
Post by monty on Aug 27, 2012 9:24:15 GMT -8
I was very happy with what I saw out of Meredith on the scrimmage - shed blocks at the line of scrimmage and scrapped down the line (job 1 and 2 of a nose man: own the middle, eliminate cut backs)
|
|
|
|
Post by k5james on Aug 27, 2012 9:45:27 GMT -8
I was very happy with what I saw out of Meredith on the scrimmage - shed blocks at the line of scrimmage and scrapped down the line (job 1 and 2 of a nose man: own the middle, eliminate cut backs) Yeah, I'm not stressing our DL like a lot of others here. They have good size and talent, they just need seasoning and this is how they'll get it. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec619 on Aug 27, 2012 11:17:37 GMT -8
I was very happy with what I saw out of Meredith on the scrimmage - shed blocks at the line of scrimmage and scrapped down the line (job 1 and 2 of a nose man: own the middle, eliminate cut backs) I'll admit to not knowing what "scrapped down the line" means so excuse the ignorance but can you please explain to help us out? I get the idea of eliminating cut backs but you can explain in detail the "scrapping". Thanks Monty or whoever anwsers. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Aug 27, 2012 11:21:30 GMT -8
I was very happy with what I saw out of Meredith on the scrimmage - shed blocks at the line of scrimmage and scrapped down the line (job 1 and 2 of a nose man: own the middle, eliminate cut backs) I'll admit to not knowing what "scrapped down the line" means so excuse the ignorance but can you please explain to help us out? I get the idea of eliminating cut backs but you can explain in detail the "scrapping". Thanks Monty or whoever anwsers. scraping, or sliding laterally off blocks?? |
|
|
|
Post by aztec619 on Aug 27, 2012 11:26:26 GMT -8
I'll admit to not knowing what "scrapped down the line" means so excuse the ignorance but can you please explain to help us out? I get the idea of eliminating cut backs but you can explain in detail the "scrapping". Thanks Monty or whoever anwsers. scraping, or sliding laterally off blocks?? Scraping. I'm guessing but is it pursuing the ball carrier while watching for the cutback to the back side? School me please?  |
|
|
|
Post by sdsustoner on Aug 27, 2012 11:28:04 GMT -8
Smaller O linemen make a better rushing game. Big hogs are better for pass blocking.
|
|
|
|
Post by monty on Aug 27, 2012 11:43:05 GMT -8
flowing to the ball laterally down the line of scrimmage
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec619 on Aug 27, 2012 11:50:21 GMT -8
flowing to the ball laterally down the line of scrimmage Thanks Monty. Just read that Nebraska will be starting 3 walk on's on their Oline this year in case anyone wants to say anything about having high stars on the oline. Stars are a gauge but ultimately you have to earn a starting position and prove you belong on the D1 level. |
|
|
|
Post by monty on Aug 27, 2012 11:55:42 GMT -8
flowing to the ball laterally down the line of scrimmage Thanks Monty. Just read that Nebraska will be starting 3 walk on's on their Oline this year in case anyone wants to say anything about having high stars on the oline. Stars are a gauge but ultimately you have to earn a starting position and prove you belong on the D1 level. Nebraska has been starting 'walk-on's' on the oline my entire life either they are just incredible across multiple staffs at finding lineman or something is afoot. |
|
|
|
Post by k5james on Aug 27, 2012 11:55:49 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Aug 27, 2012 13:41:43 GMT -8
Yeah like in the bad old days before there were scholarship limits and they had 135 player team$!  |
|
|
|
Post by Old School on Aug 27, 2012 15:56:09 GMT -8
Smaller O linemen make a better rushing game. Big hogs are better for pass blocking. +1 Just ask Air Force. Oldie Out |
|
|
|
Post by killiansc on Aug 27, 2012 20:52:52 GMT -8
Yep bring them in and juice them out of minds. |
|
|
|
Post by mattpohl on Aug 28, 2012 0:33:55 GMT -8
They probably all have scholarships from outside foundations. Hang in there, Matt
|
|
